Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 14 directors Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 122 results (0.120 seconds)

1. Dr. Rajiv Gupta Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... associate professor in surgery for five years in a medical college or a recognized teaching medical institution such as aiims new delhi, pgi chandigarh, jimer pondicherry and such other institutions, as are recognized by the medical council of india . b) associate professor -do- as assistant professor in surgery for ..... tutor or a senior resident for a period of two years in a recognized teaching medical institution recognized by the medical council of india or the university of kashmir /jammu provided that the teaching experience, if any, gained before or during the postgraduation studentship shall not be considered while determining the ..... enroll doctors in the concerned discipline. dr. vikrant singh claims to have dnb qualification in surgical gastroenterology . schedule-i to the indian medical council act 1956 does not include surgical gastroenterology amongst the recognized medical qualifications. the diplomat n.b. qualification granted by national board of examination after 30th august, .....

Dr. Arun Sharma Vs. State and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... qualifications by medical institutions within india but not included in the schedule-i. schedules i, ii, and iii of the act catalogue universities and medical institutions and the degrees granted by such universities recognized under the act. in case of part-i of the schedule-iii, 25 such recognition is subject to the conditions laid down in ..... in the said case, the appellants were aspirants for the post of lecturer in thoracic surgery. dr. arvind kohli had m.ch degree in cvts from jipmer, pondicherry whereas dr. ishtiaq mir had m.ch degree in cvts from skims, srinagar. the doctors though having m.ch degrees in the speciality concerned to their credit ..... and experience as prescribed in schedule ii [serial no.29 (b)].16. in the present case, the petitioners have mbbs from a university mentioned in the ist schedule, indian medical council act, 1956. they admittedly do not have post-graduation degree in surgery/gynaecology/medicine and other clinical subjects to their credit. the petitioners .....

M/S Reckitt Benckiser. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... . the said notification exempted the goods specified in the first schedule and the second schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985, other than the goods specified in annexure i appended to the notification, and cleared from a unit located in the industrial growth centre, industrial infrastructure development ..... the same which the respondents were legitimately entitled to avail. we fail to understand why the appellant corporation which made a representation and allowed the other party to act upon such representation could resile and leave the citizens in a lurch. in such a situation, the principle of promissory estoppel which has been evolved by the ..... public morality that the incumbent who have felt persuaded on account of the representation made by the state government that they will be given certain benefits and they acted on that representation, it does not behove on the part of the appellant corporation to withdraw the said benefit before expiry of the stipulated period by issuing .....

Dr. Dalip Singh Jamwal Vs. University of Jammu and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ545

..... case the writ petition is allowed.12. the appointment of teachers is regulated by the jammu and kashmir universities act, 1968, and .statutes & regulations under the act (as amended upto february, 1999) (for short hereinafter referred to as the act). section 24(d) of the act provides that all appointment (permanent or temporary) to the posts of teachers shall be made by the ..... years.14. it is not in dispute that initial appointment of the petitioner as a teaching fellow was upto the end of current academic session, i.e. 31.5.1985. thereafter, on completing his ph.d. vide order dated 11.2.1986, salary of the petitioner was fixed equivalent to minimum of the pay scale of rs. 700- ..... difference of pay and allowances in the event of change of date of placement.3. in brief, the facts are that the petitioner vide order dated 9.4.1985 was initially appointed as teaching fellow in the department of mathematics at a consolidated salary of rs. 700/- per month. his appointment was to take effect from 11. .....

Sandeep Singh and ors. Vs. University of Jammu and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ452

..... was allowed by the vice chancellor in anticipation of the approval of the competent authority in terms of section 13 (iv) of the kashmir and jammu universities act 1959. the competent authority though approved the action of the vice chancellor in respect to the conferment of the benefit of re-evaluation to some of the ..... to formulate any policy or guide-lines in a particular area/field, the same can govern and regulate all actions relating to that field. therefore, the university even without framing statute has the authority to take decision in respect to matters relating to admission of a particular course, its examination and all other related ..... has placed reliance upon the apex court judgment in the case of maharashtra state board of secondary and higher secondary education v. paritosh bhupesh kumar sheth, : [1985]1scr29 . in the afore-said case the maharashtra state board of secondary and higher secondary education had framed regulation in exercise of its regulation making power under .....

Parshotam Lal and ors. Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3378

..... cannot be relied upon for the purpose of recording conviction.19. while examining the scope of section 50 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 (also referred to as the 1985 act), a constitution bench of the supreme court of india has observed that it is an obligation of the empowered officer and. his duty before ..... , j.1. the appellants in these three appeals stand convicted for having committed offences punishable under sections 20 and 22 of the narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985. they have been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and pay a fine of rupees one lakh each. in default of payment ..... heroin were recovered from the residence of darshan singh.the counsel appearing for parshotam lal appellant has urged;(i) that there was non-compliance of section 42 of 1985 act. according to him the information which was received by the customs and the i.b. department was not reduced into writing;(ii) that before the search .....

Mohd. Khan S/O. Alaf DIn and Cate Hujam Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3206

..... whatever material could be retrieved was retrieved. this was duly sealed.9. scope of section 50 of 1985 act be examined.10. while examining the scope of section 50 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (also referred to as the 1985 act), a constitution bench of the supreme court of india has observed that it is an obligation of the ..... t.s. doabin, j.1. appellant stands convicted under section 20(b)(ii) and section 23 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1985).2. prosecution story in brief is that on the night intervening 1/2 feb., 1988 near factory of fatehpur garian, the police party had laid a ambush ..... only on the basis of the possession of the illicit article recovered from his person during the search conducted in violation of the provisions of section 50 of the 1985 act, this would be bad.vii. that the requirement of the right of a person to be informed would be applicable only if the person is to be .....

Sher-i-kashmir National Medical Institute Trust Vs. State of J and K a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... ahmad, ex-director, skims; prof. s. jalal, dean faculty of skims and external expert, namely, prof. sifat afzal, professor of medicine, aligarh muslim university, besides, the director and vice chairman of skims. the professors whose particulars are detailed hereinabove are admitted the only qualified members of the selection committee in the discipline ..... made in its favour. the learned counsel appearing for the parties have drawn our attention to various provisions of the transfer of property act, registration act and the land grants act, to canvass the legal import of the 1978 order. 72. the most vital question that arises for consideration, therefore, is whether ..... the petitioner and that dr. ali muhammad matoo pursuant to government orders no.122-ism of 1981 dated 8th july, 1981; 137-ims of 1985 dated 8th november, 1985, had been the chairman of standing academic committee, purchase committee, senior selection committee and, as the decisions regarding policy matters of the institute .....

Sukesh Chander Khajuria Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... wholetime and non-practising. in institutions where part time/ hony, teachers are employed in clinical departments, they should be replaced by wholetime teachers by 1985. in the meantime, such part time/hony. teachers will only be recognized as teachers provided they put in not less than 4 hours clinical and ..... existing situations, till proper facilities etc. are available and the existing vacancies filled up. this course would be permissible under section 13 of the 1983 act, which authorise the state government to nominate the prescribed authorities for granting permission to a government servant, including a government doctor, to undertake private practice ..... 1879. said doctors along with other government servants are governed by jammu and kashmir public men and public servants (declaration of assets and other provisions) act, 1983. according to the petitioner, under both these statutory provisions it was not permissible for the doctors in the employment of the state government to indulge .....

Tilak Chand JaIn Vs. Darshan Lal JaIn and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1985J& K50

..... the halsbury's laws of england page 573 (supra) relied on by him for purposes of payment of inlerest to the outgoing partner is a proposition which cannot be universally accepted. this proposition has arisen in the peculiar circumstances of the case. the commentary in this regard is based on a decision gordon v. gcnda (1955) 2 ..... and the partnership property as it stood on the day of dissolution had not been distributed in accordance with the provisions of sections 46 and 48 of the partnership act. (iii) a partner seeking relief must further show that partnership property including assets, goodwill, in which he has a share are retained by the partner against ..... of a partner in a reconstituted firm when the original constitution of the firm is changed. it will also be profitable to note and reproduce section 46 of the partnership act which reads as under : -- '46 right of partners to have business wound un after dissolution : -- on the dissolution of a firm every partner or his representative .....