Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 10 chief rector Page 10 of about 26,574 results (0.391 seconds)

The Industrial Finance Corporation of India Vs. Delhi Administration a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1973(27)FLR207]; ILR1973Delhi29; 1974LabIC223

..... applied the criteria pointed out by us. (45) in sher singh v. the vice-chancellor, punjab university chandigarh, and others, , (30) it was held that the punjab university is an autonomous body created by the east punjab university act 7 of 1947, that it is not a state within the meaning of that expression in part xiv ..... decisions in order to implement those laws'.(28) the learned judge next referred to the following observation in k. s. ramamurthy reddiar v. the chief commissioner, pondicherry (supra). 'further,all local or other authorities within the territory of india include all authorities within the territory of india whether under the control of the ..... in the body politic.'(22) in paragraph 174. mudholkar.j. observed that a taxing authority is an instrumentality of the state. 'ink. s. ramamurthy v. chief commissioner, pondicherry, : [1964]1scr656 , the supreme court held that the words 'under the control of the government of india' in article 12 qualify the word 'authorities' and not .....

Muthulakshmi, W/O. Arumugham Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Chief S ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2005(5)CTC650; (2005)3MLJ421

..... the 12th defendant, the plaintiff has no legal right to set aside the judicial order dated 13.01.1989 and 06.04.1992 passed by the second additional district judge, pondicherry in l.a.o.p. no. 109 of 1997. 6. the plaintiff has raised strong objection to the petition contending that it is not obligatory on the part ..... an extent of 6 hectares 11 acres 32 cents situated in pillaichavady and kalapet villages in oulgaret commune were acquired by the government for the purpose of establishment of central university phase iv under award no. 1/87 dated 25.03.1987. an amount of rs. 2,56,990/0- was awarded as compensation for the lands acquired by ..... deposited in civil court under section 31(2) of the land acquisition act. reference was made under section 30 of the land acquisition act for deciding rightful ownership and appointment of the compensation amount. in l.a.o.p. no. 109 of 1987, learned second additional district judge, pondicherry held that respondents 4 to 7 and 11 to 17 are the rightful .....

Balambal Vs. Kannammal Alias Pazhaniammal (Died) and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)1MLJ181

..... the whereabouts or the information as to existence of ramalingam was not known. taking advantage of the extension of the provisions of the hindu succession act and evidence act to the union territory of pondicherry, the plaintiff has filed the suit in question for a declaration of the civil death of the plaintiff's only son and consequential declaration that ..... 1. the above second appeal has been filed by the second defendant in o.s. no. 70 of 1977 on the file of the i additional subordinate judge, pondicherry.2. the second defendant appellant is indisputably the daughter of late sambasiva pathar through his first wife angammal, who was said to have died in 1931. thereafter sambasiva ..... have been occasioned also by the fact that the college in which he was studying in b.a. history ii year did not send upramalingam for university examinations to be held in mareh, 1964 due to his poor academic performance and that having regard to the provisions contained in section 34 of the specific relief .....

Dr. T.M. Paul Vs. City Hospital (Pvt.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas216(Ker)

..... shareholders on september 19, 1992, at neelima hall in edacochin. the plaintiffs did not attend the meeting. according to the plaintiffs, the second plaintiff was away in pondicherry and did not get notice of the meeting. the first plaintiff had already fixed up an operation at about the time of the meeting, and, hence, she ..... he had to attend a meeting of examiners. he was at that time working as the director of the school of indian legal thought in the mahatma gandhi university at kottayam. the first plaintiff as p.w. 3 has also stated so. according to the first plaintiff, the second defendant did not tell them anything about ..... co-operative societies, etc. but, no authoritative pronouncement of the supreme court on the question of jurisdiction of civil courts in matters pertaining to companies coming under the companies act has been cited. learned counsel for the appellants have placed reliance on the decision in sri ramdas motor transport ltd. v. tadi adhinarayana reddy : [1997]3scr1160 . .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, A. P. Vs. Krishna Industrial Corporation L ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1973]92ITR261(AP)

..... aforesaid amounts attracted income-tax when they have been earned by the transferee-company in its business. as observed by lord macmillan in the case of pondicherry railway company 'profits on their coming into existence attract tax at the point and the revenue is not concerned with the subsequent application of the profits ..... its own documents' in order to determine whether a particular periodical payment is income or capital. there is, therefore no, single rule of thumb having universal application for the solution of the problem, whether a particular receipt it capital or revenue and a particular payment is revenue or capital expenditure. all periodical ..... it fell for decision whether the periodical payments made in pursuance of an agreement transfer of business were deductible in computing trading profits under the income tax act, 1952. the learned law lord pointed out :'....that merely to stipulated for installment payment in no way alters the character of the payment itself,.....next .....

Panipat Woollen and General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1970]78ITR142(P& H)

..... meaning of section 10(2)(xv).9. before the tribunal the department's case was that the instant case fell within the rule laid down by the privy council in pondicherry railway co. ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax, a.i.r. 1931 p.c. 165, whereas the case of the assessee was that it really fell within the ambit ..... the surrounding circumstances so as to arrive at a decision as to what was the real nature of the transaction from the commercial point of view. no single test of universal application can be discovered for a solution of the question. the name which the parties may give to the transaction which is the source of the receipt and the ..... . they were arrived at on an agreed basis. the deductions to be taken into account to arrive at profits were not those which were contemplated either by the income-tax act or by a prudent commercial practice or normal commercial method of accountancy. it is, in our opinion, this distinction which tilts the case in favour of the assessee.20. .....

Ujjam Bai. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC1621; 1963(1)SCR778

..... specified in section 58 and could not be for a lesser period. the question was therefore of jurisdiction.in universal imports agency v. the chief controller of imports and exports ([1961] 1 s.c.r. 305.), the petitioners, in pondicherry, entered before its merger with india, into firm contracts with foreign sellers and the goods agreed to be ..... was not a petition under article 32. in that case the sales tax under explanation ii to section 2(g) of the central provinces & berar sales tax act (act 2 of 1947) was held ultra vires of the state legislature because it offended article 286(1)(a) and its imposition or threat of imposition was held without ..... ) 1 k.b. 171, 205.) :"whenever any body or persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of subjects and having the duty to act judicially act in excess of their legal authority they are subject to the controlling jurisdiction of the kings bench division exercised in these writs."what was said of judicial action and .....

Sri Bhushan Mallik Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... -2006 night as per the plans of ramachandra reddy, his father vidyasagar reddy and mother naarasamma, ramachandra reddy had killed my daughter sujatha brutally at a hotel at pondicherry due to dowry harassment. this is the only statement which contains an allegation pertaining to the possible conspiracy of the husband's parents who, it must be kept ..... (3) the test to determine a prima facie case would naturally depend upon the facts of each case and it is difficult to lay down a rule of universal application. by and large however if two views are equally possible and the judge is satisfied that the evidence produced before him while giving rise to some suspicion ..... to bring it within the purview of death occurring otherwise than in normal circumstances. the expression soon before is very relevant where section 113-b of the evidence act and section 304-b ipc are pressed into service. prosecution is obliged to show that soon before the occurrence there was cruelty or harassment and only in that .....

Smt. Ujjam Bai Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1963]1SCR778; [1963]Supp2SCR778

..... specified in section 58 and could not be for a lesser period. the question was therefore of jurisdiction. 138. in universal imports agency v. the chief controller of imports and exports : [1961]1scr305 , the petitioners, in pondicherry, entered before its merger with india, into firm contracts with foreign sellers and the goods agreed to be imported were ..... was not a petition under article 32. in that case the sales tax under explanation ii to section 2(g) of the central provinces & berar sales tax act (act 2 of 1947) was held ultra vires of the state legislature because it offended article 286(1)(a) and its imposition or threat of imposition was held ..... (1924) 1 k.b. 171 : 'whenever any body or persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of subjects and having the duty to act judicially act in excess of their legal authority they are subject to the controlling jurisdiction of the kings bench division exercised in these writs.' 227. what was said of judicial .....

Dr.J.Santhosh Kumar. Vs. the Block Medical Officer.

Court : Chennai

..... asked the ambulance driver to take the said bagiyammal to jawaharlal nehru institute of medical sciences and research, jipmer, pondicherry. it is the case of the petitioner that while taking her from tirukoilur to pondicherry, she expired. thereafter, her body was taken to porikkal village, tiruvannamalai district. her relatives alleged as if she ..... practitioner in allopathic system as also recognition of medical qualifications and examinations by universities or medical institutions in india.32. section 15 of this act provides that any person possessing any of the qualifications mentioned in the schedule appended to the act, may apply for the registration of his name. sub-sections 2 and ..... house of lords in whitehouse vs. jordon (1981) 1 all er 267 (hl); maynard vs. west midlands regional health authority (1985) 1 all er 635 (hl); and sidway vs. bathlem royal hospital (1985) 1 all er 643 (hl).12. in two decisions rendered by this court, namely, dr.laxman balakrishna joshi v. dr.trimbak .....