Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 6 rules of construction Page 9 of about 360 results (0.063 seconds)

Arul @ Arul jothi and Another Vs. State by Inspector of Police Nelliku ...

Court : Chennai

..... joshima janardhanan has spoken about the treatment given to the deceased between 29.10.2008 to 03.11.2008 and p.w.3-sumathi at the pims hospital, pondicherry. p.w.16-dr.senthil kumar has spoken about the treatment given to the injured at the government hospital at cuddalore district. p.w.17-dr.syed ali ..... honda motorcycle and other properties worth around rs.15,000/-. in the same occurrence, all the 17 accused went to the house of p.w.9-sowndhararajan and caused extensive damage to the grinder, fan, wall clock, tubelight, almairah glass and house hold utensils, worth around rs.15,000/-. after the above occurrence, all the accused ..... consultation. it is, therefore, essential that the delay in the lodging of the first information report should be satisfactorialy explained. in the present case kopia daughter-in-law of madhandi deceased according to the prosecution case, was present when the accused made murderous assault on the deceased. valanjiaraju, step-son of the deceasedm is also alleged .....

M/S. Shriram Chits and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Oth ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC2063; [1994]79CompCas298(SC); (1994)2CompLJ430(SC); JT1993(4)SC399; 1993(3)SCALE125; 1993Supp(4)SCC226; [1993]Supp1SCR54

..... nadu. with appropriate changes, this act was adopted, with effect from 15th july, 1964, in the union territory of delhi. the union territory of pondicherry has the pondicherry chit funds act, 1966, which came into force from 1st august, 1967. in kerala, the travancore chitties act of 1964, and cochin kuris regulations 1932 ..... arbitration. chapter xiii provides for miscellaneous provisions, viz., advisory role of reserve bank, appeals from the order of the registrar, power of registrar to give extension of time for filing documents, penalties, offences by companies, etc.12. the submission of union of india before the high court was that the legislation in ..... necessary. it will be desirable to provide in the legislation that only public limited companies can run chit funds. pending such uniform legislation, existing state laws regulating chit funds registered within the state should be made applicable to their branches in the states having no legislation. this will essentially be an interim .....

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. MustakhuseIn GulamhuseIn ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1982)31CTR(Bom)123; [1983]143ITR951(Bom); [1983]12TAXMAN61(Bom)

..... which need to be considered in some detail. clause (b) of para. 2 of the taxation laws extension regulation, 1963, runs as follows :''union territory ' means any of the union territories of dadra and nagar haveli, goa, daman and diu, and pondicherry.'5. clause (1) of para. 3 provides that the acts specified in pt. i of ..... . act, 1961, was extended to the territory of daman by the taxation laws (extension to union territories) regulation, 1963, with effect from april 1, 1963, and the corresponding laws enforced in the said territories were repealed. the said regulation is referred to hereinafter as 'the extension regulation, 1963'. clause (25a) was inserted in s. 2 of the said ..... income the assessee was assessed to tax under the local law, viz., the portuguese law, and had paid that tax.13. the submission of mr. joshi, learned counsel for the department, is that after the extension of the said act to the territory of daman by the extension regulation of 1963, the assessee became a resident of .....

R. Ramaiya Vs. S. Swaminathan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ518

..... panchayat act. the revision-petitioner also denied having encroached upon the government property and also denied having done several manipulations to overcome the regulation and restriction of the pondicherry planning authority. according to the revision-petitioner, the respondent is the deputy director in the statistics department and that he had raised a compound wall at his ..... and proper parties. it is further stated in the written statement that the revision petitioner by his illegal construction has blocked the entire government canal and the extension of the road used by the public, and only when it was brought to the notice of the proposed parties by the respondent, the present suit with ..... which he can be compelled to fight against some other litigant not for his own choice unless such a process is required by the positive rule of law. that was a case where the secretary of state for india in council was sought to be impleaded as a party to obtain declaration that the madras .....

Kemi Kwaja Mohideen Vs. Susan Galife

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ20

..... basis of the endorsement or on the basis of the agreement reached between the parties. i can only say that the principal district munsif, pondicherry, rent controller has failed to appreciate that the law is well-settled by catena of the decisions of the supreme court as well as this court that the order of eviction passed on ..... against the tenant, was also compromised on the basis of the endorsement made by the tenant. the view of the learned principal district munsif that since under the pondicherry buildings (lease and rent control) act, a rent controller can grant only three months time and since the rent controller has granted three years time in the instant ..... the entire petition premises to the landlord on or before the said date viz., 5th june, 1969 without fail under any circumstances and undertakes not to apply for extension of time. it was agreed by both parties that the memo of compromise was executable as a decree of court. the compromise petition was signed by both the .....

Venkataraja and Others Vs. Vidyane Doureradjaperumal (D) Thr.Lrs. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .1989, observing that the sale deed had been executed by thayanayagy ammalle in favour of defendant no. 1 on 16.7.1959, prior to the extension of the hindu succession act to pondicherry on 1.10.1963. the result of the same was that she had sold only her life estate in the suit property, as she was only ..... by the civil court, which held that: a) since kannussamy row had died before the introduction of the hindu succession act, and considering the hindu law applicable in the french territory of pondicherry, after the death of the sole male heir to the suit property, the wife and the mother of the legal heir would have only usufructuary right ..... avoid the multiplicity of the proceedings, and also the loss of revenue of court fees. when the specific relief act, 1877 was in force, the 9th report of the law commission of india, 1958, had suggested certain amendments in the proviso, according to which, the plaintiff could seek declaratory relief without seeking any consequential relief, if he sought .....

Venkataraja and ors. Vs. Vidyane Doureradjaperumal(D)thr.Lrsand ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 4.1989, observing that the sale deed had been executed by thayanayagy ammalle in favour of defendant no.1 on 16.7.1959, prior to the extension of the hindu succession act to pondicherry on 1.10.1963. the result of the same was that she had sold only her life estate in the suit property, as she was ..... by the civil court, which held that: a) since kannussamy row had died before the introduction of the hindu succession act, and considering the hindu law applicable in the french territory of pondicherry, after the death of the sole male heir to the suit property, the wife and the mother of the legal heir would have only usufructuary right ..... avoid the multiplicity of the proceedings, and also the loss of revenue of court fees. when the specific relief act, 1877 was in force, the 9th report of the law commission of india, 1958, had suggested certain amendments in the proviso, according to which, the plaintiff could seek declaratory relief without seeking any consequential relief, if he sought .....

P. Kasirajan Vs. Union of India, Rep.by the Director, Ministry of Pers ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2013(2)LLN195

..... procedure, the 6th respondent was selected and appointed by direct recruitment. after appointment by direct recruitment, the appointments were finalised between the government and pondicherry university. therefore, it is clear that the 6th respondent was appointed by direct recruitment and not by deputation. the parent department relieved the petitioner on ..... petitioner shall be subject to maximum of three years. in cases where the extention is necessary in public interest, the administrative minister may grant extension up to one year and it may extend for the fifth year also only in exceptional circumstances. no such exceptional circumstance has been stated by ..... any competition or inviting applications from other candidates is also against the law. neither reasons nor extraordinary reasons have been stated by the third respondent in its resolution as to why his tenure was extended. 22. merely because, pondicherry university statutes 19(1)note 3, contemplates renewal for similar terms by .....

In Re: Rethinaswamy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1967)2MLJ276

..... detention of the appellant in custody which would be normally inconceivable under the criminal processual law and the constitution, prevalent in the rest of this country except pondicherry area, and now prevailing there after the recent extension of our criminal law to that state also. further, for the grounds already stated by us, we are ..... answers of the accused in confrontation in the presence of those witnesses, as provided for by the code of instruction-(criminal) which was then applicable to. pondicherry territory. under article 133 of this code, the judge then remitted the matter to the chambre de mises en accusation which is the session of the ..... the tribunal criminal, karikal, dated 21st december, 1963. the appeals have been preferred as pourvoi en cassation to us, and also under section 10 of the pondicherry (administration) act, xlix of 1962. the matter involves a careful scrutiny of the following inter-related aspects. firstly, the procedure followed in the french courts, .....

Naveen Kumar Vs. Animal Husbandary Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... qualification. when he came to know about rejection of his candidature, he immediately objected to the same by sending a letter dated 15.2.2010, issued by the pondicherry university, certifying the fact that the qualification of m.sc. (marine biology) is equivalent to m.sc. (zoology).3. it has been submitted that the date ..... occasion, the petitioner had been permitted to participate in the interview pursuant to advertisement no. 14/2008 having the same qualification for appointment on the post of fisheries extension officer, in which he had been declared successful and had also been appointed.5. thus, it has been submitted that when on the basis of the same ..... qualification, is absolutely incorrect and without any application of mind, the same cannot be accepted due to the following reasons:14. it is settled proposition of law that any appointment is to be made on the basis of certain recruitment rules. the state government had formulated the recruitment rules in the year 2004 prescribing .....