Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.120/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.1,66,440/- with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.118/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.2,20,308/- with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.03.2007 passed in W.C.No.119/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Raichur District, Raichur, awarding a compensation of Rs.1,77,050/with interest @ 12% p.a. This Miscellaneous First appeal is filed u/s. 30 (1) of WC Act, against the Judgment and Order dated 15.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [2008(117)FLR121]; ILR2008KAR1819; 2008(1)KarLJ695; (2008)ILLJ943Kant; ILR2008(2)Kar1819; 2008(1)KLJ695; 2008(1)KCCR241; 2008(1)AIRKarR441; 2008-I-LLJ943; 2008LabIC(NOC)339(Kar)(DB)
A.N. Venugopala Gowda, J.1. As the dispute between the parties lies in a narrow compass, with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing on both the sides, the appeal is heard for final disposal.2. Brief facts of the case necessary for consideration and disposal of this appeal are:(i) The appellant is a Company engaged in paints and varnishes Industry. The 2nd respondent was employed as sales representative by the appellant on 1.7.1985. He has resigned from service of the appellant with effect from 1.4.1996. Thereafter he was paid an amount of Rs. 2,128.50 as gratuity, as per the scheme of the appellant 2nd respondent being dissatisfied with the said payment, had filed an application under Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for short 'the Act') in Form N, before the Controlling Authority to determine the amount of gratuity payable to him. In the annexure to the said application, the appellant has stated that the post held by him was 'sales representative' and he had put ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayers: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare the notification Ann-A the notification dt.27.8.08, is ultra vires the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the demand notice dtd.18.9.2013 vide Annex-A and the demand notice dtd.21.9.2013 vide Annex-A1, both issued by the R4, and all further proceedings thereto and etc., This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the notification dt. 16.8.2008 issued by the R1 and published in the Gazette on 27.8.2008 vide Annexure E and the memorandum/common order dt. 30.9.2008 issued by the R4 vide Annexure G and all further proceedings thereto, in so far as the petitioner is ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014PRESENT AND THE HON'BLE MR. D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE R THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION Nos.6842-6880/2010 (S-KAT) WRIT PETITION Nos.15002/2011 & 21131-21146/2011,16948-16995/2010, 8215/2010, C/W87152010 & 8906/2010, 10106/2010 & 12726- 12763/2010, 17294-17327/2010, 17481/2010 & 17485-17490/2010 & 17723-17727/2010, 19401/2011 & 21520-21530/2011, 24525/2010, 41905-41908/2010 & 6747-6758/2011, 908-911/2011, 103593/2014 & 103620- 103657/2014 (S-KAT) IN WP Nos.6842-6880/2010 (S-KAT) BETWEEN:1. MAHESH A C S/O CHANDREGOWDA AGED35YEARS, NO.28/2, ARALAGUPPE VITULAPURA POST, K.R.PET TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT ARUN PATIL S/O SURENDRA S PATIL DELETED V/O DTD. AGED39YEARS0503.2010 SURESH C S/O CHANNAPPA POOJAR AGED35YEARS, KURUBARABEEDI JANNAPURA, BHADRAVATHI SHIVANANJEGOWDA B N S/O NANJEGOWDA B C AGED32YEARS, NO.37, M.E.S.ROAD OPP:MOTHER THERESA SCHOOL MUTHYALAMMA NAGARA JALAHALLI, BANGALORE560054 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.7032 of 2022 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF APRIL, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.7032 OF2022(L-RES) BETWEEN: THE MANGEMENT OF DR AMBEDKAR PARA MEDICAL EDUCATION SOCITY (R) REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA REGISTRATION ACT, 1960 RENUKA COMPLEX, BASAVESHWARA CIRCLE, BHADRAVATHI57730. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MR. GANESH S. ... PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVERI THIMMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI SHAMBHU GOWDA S/O LATE HUCHECHE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT77YEARS, OFFICE ASSISTANT-CUM-STENO/ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DR.AMBEDKAR PARA MEDICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY, RENUKA COMPLEX, BASAVESHWARA CIRCLE, BHADRAVATHI, RESIDING AT WDWC-189/A, HUTTA COLONY, BHADRAVATHI57730. RESPONDENT - 2 - WP No.7032 of 2022 (BY SRI. A.J.SRINIVASAN, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND/ OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER AND CALL FOR THE LOWER COURT RE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 372 Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the judgement and order of acquittal dt.27.05.10 passed by the P.O. FTC-I. Bengaluru in S.C.No. 489/04 Acquuitting the Respondents/Accused for the offence P/U/S 120-B, 302. 201 R/W 34 IPC.) 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal rendered by the Fast Track Court-I, Bangalore City in SC No.489/2004, the above said two appeals have been preferred. 2. Criminal Appeal No.952/2010 is filed by the mother of the deceased (PW-3 before the Trial Court), whereas Criminal Appeal No.754/2010 has been preferred by the State. The Trial Court has acquitted the accused Nos.1 to 3 (Respondents 1 to 3) herein for the offences punishable under Section 120B, 302, 201 read with Section 34 of IPC vide judgment dated 27.3.2010. 3. At the preliminary stage, the respondents have raised an objection with regard to the maintainability of the appeal preferred by the mother of the deceased (PW- 3 before the trial court) b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF AUGUST, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.244 OF2020(GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.8031 OF2020(GM-RES) IN W.P. No.244/2020: BETWEEN:1. SRI VINOD RAMNANI, S/O. PARASRAM RAMNANI, AGED ABOUT65YEARS, NO.115, KASAVANAHALLI, SARJAPUR ROAD, VARTHUR, BENGALURU-560 035. SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIM.2. SMT. USHA RAMNANI W/O. MR. VINOD RAMNANI, AGED ABOUT62YEARS, NO.115, KASAVANAHALLI, SARJAPUR ROAD, VARTHUR, BENGALURU-560 035. SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIM. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J, ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATION HOUSE OFFICER C.B.I./A.C.B/BANGALORE, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032.2. STATE BANK OF INDIA STRESSED ASSETS MANAGEMENT BRANCH, 2ND FLOOR, OFFICE COMPLEX BUILDING, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE COMPOUND, BENGALURU-560 004. 2 REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, M. RAMAKRISHNA SHENOY AGED ABOUT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE23R D DAY OF APRIL, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.63477 OF2010[KLR-RR/SUR]. BETWEEN:1. DAMODAR S/O VITTAL KAMATH AGE68YEAS, OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE R/O SHANTINIKETAN, NEAR SANA COLLEGE BHAIRIDEVARKOPPA, DHARWAD ROAD, HUBLI2 3.4.5. SRI.GAJANAN S/O DAMODAR KAMATH AGE37YEARS, OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE R/O SHANTINIKETAN, NER SANA COLLEGE BHAIRIDEVARKOPPA DHARWAD ROAD, HUBLI SRI.MANJUNATH S/O DAMODAR KAMATH AGE37YEARS, OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE R/O SHANTINIKETAN, NER SANA COLLEGE BHAIRIDEVARKOPPA DHARWAD ROAD, HUBLI SMT GAYATRI W/O NAGESH PRABHU D/O DAMODHAR KAMATH AGE34YEARS, OC:HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O AKASHAVNAI DHARWAD SMT. LAXMIBAI W/O GOVIND SHANBHAG AE80YEARS, OC:HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O DOOR NO.454, 11TH MAIN, 25TH CROS7H SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT BANGALORE :2. : REP BY PETITIONER NO.1 THE SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI. DAMODAR S/O VITTAL KAMATH AGE68YEARS, OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE R/O SHANTINIKETAN, NER SANA COLLEGE BHAIRIDE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 1st day of July, 2015 Present THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VINEET SARAN & THE HONBLE MRS JUSTICE S SUJATHA Income Tax Appeal 504 / 2013 Between Appellant Sri N Govindaraju 56 yrs, S/o Narayanappa # 101, Divyashree Residency H D Devegowda Road R T Nagar, Bangalore 32 (By Sri A Shankar, Adv. for Sri V S Yogesh Kumar, Adv.)) And 1 2 (By Sri E Sanmathi Indrakumar, Adv.) Appeal is filed under S.260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying to set aside the order passed by the ITAT, Bangalore in ITA970Bang/2009 on 26.04.2010, etc. Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals II, Bangalore 82 Income Tax Officer Ward 8(2), Bangalore 82 Respondents 2 Appeal having been reserved on 20th April, 2015, coming on for pronouncement of Orders this day, Vineet Saran J, delivered the following: JUDGMENT The primary question that requires determination in this appeal is that when the reason recorded for reopening the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
-:1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY WRIT APPEAL No.538/2020 (GM-RES) Connected with WRIT APPEAL No.545/2020 (GM-RES) IN W.A.No.538/2020 BETWEEN:1. SRI U.M. RAMESH RAO S/O. LATE U.M. KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT77YEARS, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT, I G ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALUR 577 101.2. M/S. VIJAYADEVAN COFFEE ESTATE A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING OFFICE AT I G ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALUR 577 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI U.M. RAMESH RAO.3. M/S. YELLIKUDIGE ESTATE A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING OFFICE AT YELLIKUDIGE VILLAGE ALDUR HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALUR TALUK 577 111 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI U.M. RAMESH RAO. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S.S. NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVAS S.V., ADVOCATE) -:2. :- AND: UNION BANK OF INDIA (FORMERLY CORPORATION BANK) M.G. ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALUR 577 101 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINN...
Tag this Judgment!