Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pharmacy act 1948 section 25 term of office and casual vacancies Page 54 of about 535 results (0.221 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Sethuraman Estate Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri M Philip Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Ashok Madivala Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt B V Shylaja Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

A C Somanna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mrs K T Kamakshamma Vs. Tahsildhar

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Venkatesh Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri K R Krishnam Raju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Jagadisha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Karnataka Reddy Janansanga Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... impugned legislation is examined, it would clearly emerge therefrom that special court under sub- section (1) of section 9 is empowered to either suo motu or on an application made by any person, officer or authority, to take cognizance of and try 514 every case arising out of any alleged act of land grabbing and if it is relating to civil dispute, it would be empowered to adjudicate the ownership and title or lawful possession of the land alleged to have been grabbed and also try for the offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka ..... . after all it must be borne in mind that the act authorises the district magistrate to deprive a citizen of his fundamental right under articles 19(1)(d) and (e), and though the object of the act and its purpose would undoubtedly attract the provisions of article 19(5) care must always be taken in passing such acts that they provide sufficient safeguards against casual, capricious or even malicious exercise of the powers conferred by them ..... ., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of the commission of the offences ..... . (10) no act or proceeding of the special court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the existence 436 of any vacancy among its members or any defect in the constitution or re- constitution thereof.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //