Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
..... that you may incur as a result of a breach of this addendum, justdial may initiate approptiate legal proceedings including under the payment and settlement systems act, 2007. (b) xxxxx (c) registration fee and payment by ecs: the contract would be valid for 12 months from the contracts effective date. except for termination in accordance with the ..... partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person but does not include a person who avails of such services for ..... xxxxx (ii) hires or avails of any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such services other than the person who 'hires or avails of the services for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
..... ,29,205/-, after deducting the applicable depreciation, and excess clause, in its report dated 10.05.2013. however, the said surveyor and loss assessor (motor, mbd, fire), had recommended for settlement, on total loss basis, to the tune of rs.2,04,150/- (i.e. rs.2,54,150/- minus (-) rs.50,000/- on account of salvage). the senior divisional manager ..... stated that the complainant had wrongly declared that he had not taken any claim, in the previous policy, whereas, he had taken the claim of rs.21,009/-, vide claim payment voucher annexure r-4. it was further stated that, thus, the complainant had approached the forum with unclean hands, and, as such, was not entitled to any relief. it ..... rs.2,29,205/-, and, on total loss basis, to the tune of rs.2,04,150/-. it was further stated the complainant was very well aware of the internal system of the opposite party, and that was why, to avoid the correct premium amount, and to take undue benefit of no claim bonus, took the policy, in dispute, from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
..... the district forum that the complainant was not entitled to interest, once she accepted the amount of rs.14,70,155/-, without any protest or demur, in full and final settlement of the claim, being correct, are affirmed. in jagjit singh versus huda and another, iii (2012) cpj 659 (nc), the national consumer disputes redressal commission, new delhi, ..... sale price of the said unit was rs.37,89,631/-, but the complainant only paid a sum of rs.14,70,155/-. the complainant, thus, defaulted, in making payment of installments, when the same fell due. in the instant case, the complainant sent a request letter dated 18.08.2012, annexure c-5, for the refund of amount, ..... in question, was to be delivered within a period of 36 months, from the date of signing the agreement aforesaid. it was stated that the complainant failed to make payment of the due installments, and, ultimately, made a request for the refund of amount, deposited by her. it was further stated that when the complainant was told by the .....
Tag this Judgment!