Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: payment and settlement systems act 2007 section 16 power to carry out audit and inspection Court: orissa Page 1 of about 1 results (0.048 seconds)

Shyam Sundar Sahoo (Dead) and After Him, Parbati Sahoo and ors. Vs. St ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2008(II)OLR278

..... .1965 pursuant to the partition effected by regd. partition deed dated 12.4.1957 is valid and whether the impugned revisional order passed by the commissioner of land records and settlement in r.p. no. 421 of 1990, annexure-4, is liable to be set aside.7. admittedly the suit lands corresponding to 1930 cs. plot no. 3156 were ..... was valid in view of registered partition deed dated 12.4.1957/24.3.1957 and that voidability of the registered sale deed was not within the competence of the settlement court to decide. hence this writ petition.4. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the registered partition deed dated 12.4.1957 had not been given effect to ..... to one utkal equipments and chemicals but possession was not delivered to the said transferee-utkal equipments and chemicals, as the sale deed had not been acted upon. during the settlement operations, the suit lands were recorded in two khatas. hal plot nos. 580 and 578 with a total area of ac. 1.230 were recorded in hal khata no. .....

Central Engineering Corporation Vs. Dorai Raj

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1960Ori39

..... made'unless and until some question has arisen between the parties in connection therewith which they have been unable to settle by agreement', it is contended that attempt at settlement was a condition precedent to the jurisdiction of the commissioner to adjudicate the alleged claim. the word 'claim' referred to in sections 22 and 10(1) does ..... is required to be made under section 10 and no particular form is prescribed. section 22 refers in terms to an application for settlement of any matter, that is, it contemplates an application for settlement after a claim is made under section 10, the discussion in the judgment of the high court indicates the scope of sections 10 ..... done in the present case. the application referred to in section 22 of the act is an application for the settlement of 'any matter'1 by the commissioner, that is to say, it contemplates an application for settlement after the claim is made under section 10. it was never the intention of the legislature that a claim should .....

Anugraha Narayan Tiwari Vs. Tahasildar, Nawapara and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1994Ori310; 78(1994)CLT467

..... landless person and that too, only up to the extent of five acres and very strict proof of continuous encroachment like payment of penalty and assessment over some years was to be demanded before settlement was sanctioned. next in relevance is letter no. 55226-g.e.(gl)-8/70-r dated 24-9-1970 from ..... ordersheets of the two encroachment cases abundantly show the petitioner all throughout to have adopted the stand of admitting the encroachments and moving for settlement of the encroached lands with him on payment of back rent and salami. the fact appears from the order dated 27-4-1970 as also 12-11-1970. such provision for ..... area encroached in excess five acres should be restored to government after eviction for settlement with other deserving landless persons and that very strict proof of continuous encroachment like payment of penalty and assessment oyer some years should be demanded before settlement was sanctioned. this government letter made it clear that any encroachment made after 13 .....

Hansraj Kooverji Rathor Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1980Ori184; 50(1980)CLT68

..... other words, the suit property does not vest in the state government, the prayer for declaration of occupancy right as well as incorrectness of the entry in the settlement record-of-rights should not have been disallowed and injunction should have been granted. it is further contended that the order of the tahsildar was subject to appeal ..... is claimed that the plaintiff having acquired occupancy right over the land, the provisions of the orissa estates abolition act are not applicable and the entry in the settlement record of rights in respect of the disputed land as nijehas land is erroneous.3. the state of orissa is the only defendant in the suit. in the ..... publication of notice under section 5 of the orissa estates abolition act, the plaintiff became aware of the fact that there was erroneous and incorrect entry in the settlement papers in respect of the disputed land as nijehas land and in consequence of that a proceeding under the orissa estates abolition act was started. the tahsildar .....

Ramakrishna Deo Vs. Collector of Koraput and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1957Ori263

..... executed by ejectment of the judgment-debtor from his holding'. by virtue of this amendment a fresh lease of life was given to the survey & settlement operations that were then taking place throughout ganjam and koraput districts notwithstanding the abolition of the estate in those districts, by issue of appropriate notifications under ..... on the fundamental assumption that the relationship of landlord and tenant between the landholder and his ryots continued to exist throughout and that the survey and settlement operations were intended for their mutual benefit.5. the orissa estates abolition act 1951 created a somewhat complicated situation. se-ction 48 of that act ..... of that chapter, i. e. detailed cadestral survey of the villages, preparation of the preliminary record of rights, final publication of the record of rights, settlement of rents and other ancillary matters such as appeals and revisions, and apportionment of costs. section 180 (1) deals with apportionment of costs for carry ng .....

Khirod Chandra Behera and Others Vs. State of Orissa and Others

Court : Orissa

..... effect from the date of the notification. it was pointed out that in spite of above said notification, the commissioner, consolidation and settlement, bhubaneswar heard settlement revision case no.496 of 2005 on 17.12.2008 and reserved the revision case for order to be pronounced on 18.12.2008 ..... consolidation, plot not a/25, nilakantha nagar, bhubaneswar/commissioner, consolidation & settlement, block-8, unit-v(in front of nirman soudha) bhubaneswar/r.d.c., central division, cuttack/r.d.c., northern division, sambalpur768001/r.d.c., ..... , board of revenue building, at/p.o. chandinichowk, cuttack/land reforms commissioner, board of revenue building, at/p.o. chandinichowk,cuttack/commissioner, land records & settlement, ,cuttack, board of revenue building, at/p.o. chandinichowk, cuttack/commissioner, consolidation, cuttack, board of revenue building, at/p.o. chandinichowk, cuttack/commissioner, .....

Sri Siddha Math Rep. by Monanta Satya Narayan Ramanuj Das and 2 ors. V ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 108(2009)CLT508

..... case was allowed & the disputed lands were settled in the name of shri jagannath mohaprabhu, bije srikhetra marfat mahanta siddha brundaban ramanuj das. in the hal settlement, the same was also recorded in the name of shri jagannath mohaprabhu, bije srikhetra marfat mahanta siddha brundaban ramanuj das.3. it is alleged by the ..... were nimbarka & ballavacharya. the nimbarka sect is known as sanapodi sampradaya, while the ballavacharya sect is called rudra sampradaya. the system of vaishnavism founded by sri chaityanna mahaprabhu is another popular system which has numerous followers in bengal, orissa & some parts of utter pradesh near about brundaban & there are several maths in ..... case of shri jagannath mahaprabhu and anr. (supra), it does not warrant for holding that the same is a partial dedication. referring to dalziel's settlement report, where amrutmonohi land is stated to be the property of lord jagannath & to gopal chandra praharaj's vasakosh, which mentions amrutmonohi land to be .....

The Titaghur Paper Mills Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1980]45STC170(Orissa)

..... agencies, etc.4. in the writ petitions challenging the notifications relating to imposition of purchase tax on 'trees agreed to be severed', the petitioners have taken settlement of forest coupes in annual auction for exploitation of timber and other forest produce. they have also entered into agreements with the government with stipulations stated therein ..... exploitation contracts are owners of paper mills engaged in the production of paper. they require bamboos for the purpose of paper pulp. they have taken settlement of some forest areas of the state government ranging from 12 to 16 years in different cases, with an option of renewal of the respective leases ..... to be felled. they shall not commence work in the contract area before payment of the first instalment.5. the petitioners who have taken settlement of forest areas for exploitation of bamboos and the petitioners who have taken annual settlement for exploitation of timber and other forest produce have challenged the notifications of .....

Pragnya Rout Vs. Hemaprava Ray and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2006Ori21; 100(2005)CLT746; 2005(II)OLR330

..... said kharida jamabandi madhya satwadhikari right in favour of suresh chandra ray, the predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff. relying upon the final report on the revisional settlement prepared by w.w. dalziel, mr. p. mohanty submitted that the term 'madhya satwadhikari' means and connotes a tenure holder and a tenure holder can never ..... documents, viz.. ext.30-permission granted by the cda to construct building, ext.4- the holding tax receipt of cuttack municipality, ext.3- the receipt showing payment of electricity dues, exts.23 to 29, agreements entered into between biswajit (plaintiff's son) and the tenants inducted in the shop rooms constructed on the disputed ..... . electricity connection to the premises was taken by biswajit. ext.3 is the demand notice for electricity installation and ext. 3/a is the receipt showing payment. biswajit had inducted several tenants in the rooms and had entered into several agreements with them, vide exts.23 to 29. at this juncture of time unfortunately .....

Ashok Kumar Majhi and Another. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... contrary to the requirements of section 29 (2)(a) of the 7 7 ,p__ bihar & orissa excise act, 1915 is wholly misconceived. its submitted g v- that the settlement for grant of rights of exclusive privilege by the state it government was permissible not only through "auction" or by calling l upon "tenders" or otherwise as the state government ..... ,9*a49*l/2}iy).j`[ gv.gopa1a gowda, c.j. iagree, i q 4 r v` k"\"""r$~*$@orissa high court, cuttack% october,20lo /akdmagistrate, nuapada for settlement of india made foreign liquor off i -` l shop (in short "imfl off shop") through lottery for the year 2010-11 at village borden. 6. mr. u.k.samal ..... procedure the state government was duly v empowered to grant such exclusive privilege through lottery system in certain cases. notice of the court was also_ drawn to form-a to the aforesaid amendment of the government order which contains the l description inviting application for settlement of imfl off shop through a "lottery" and particularly clause-3(vii) of .....