Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: payment and settlement systems act 2007 section 14 power to enter and inspect Sorted by: recent Court: kerala Page 1 of about 19 results (0.111 seconds)

State of Kerala Represented by its Chief Secretary to Government and O ...

Court : Kerala

..... of the land or buildings above the canal. 28. learned advocate general refuting the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the settlement records prepared in 1920 the property has been described as kandu krishi thanathu which was covered by the kandu krishi thanathu proclamation, 1124 (1949) and ..... commercial establishments in the building and also to major portion of the east for area. adjacent to the transformers, the electrical room with various distribution system and metering systems of the occupants in the building is situated. a portion of the transformers and the electrical room comes over a portion of the underground drainage ..... of the land in dispute will be assessed as it prevails on the date on which the section 4 notification is published in the official gazette. payment of compensation/award amount will be made to the claimants/persons interested immediately thereafter, along with all statutory benefits. the appellant shall be entitled to pursue .....

Manjilas Agro Private Ltd. Vs. Nil

Court : Kerala

..... was to settle the gratuity when an employee leaves the organization and as such it was treated as payment of gratuity as `retrenchment expense'. they have also explained the same in the affidavit to the effect that the statutory authorities were satisfied with the settlement of gratuity dues and therefore, there was no litigation against the merging entities on the said account ..... table-2. that apart, it is stated in the affidavit that the shareholders and creditors were also satisfied with the explanations of the management on the above said treatment of payment of gratuity mentioned in the affidavit and consequently approved the merger as they are fully confident of the fact that the transferee company would comply with as-15 in the .....

P.K. Vijayan Vs. T.A. Jayaprabha

Court : Kerala

Hariprasad, J. 1. This original petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India comes up before us pursuant to an order of reference passed by a learned Single Judge. Parties to this proceedings are husband and wife. Wife (respondent-plaintiff) filed O.S.No.82 of 1997 before the Court of Subordinate Judge, Thiruvalla against her husband (petitioner-defendant) for return of `50,000/- allegedly entrusted with him at the time of their marriage and also for the value of her ornaments, said to have been appropriated by him. Learned trial Judge dismissed the suit. An appeal was brought up before this Court as A.S.No.93 of 2000. A Division Bench of this Court allowed the appeal in part and remanded the matter to the trial court for fresh disposal. This Court confirmed the finding of trial court that the plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant had received Rs. 50,000/- at the time of marriage. However, the Division Bench was of the view that the trial court's denial of t...

M/s. Fresh Coconut Products Ltd. rep. by its Managing Director Aarattu ...

Court : Kerala

..... . the said interlocutory application was filed on the assertion that, the 1st appellant company has already settled the claim of the 1st respondent corporation by making a payment of rs.32,02,500/- on 14.12.2015, by way of one time settlement. similarly, it has cleared the liability due towards icici bank ltd. by making a further ..... payment of rs.35,00,000/-, by way of one time settlement. it is also averred in the accompanying affidavit that, as on the date of filing of that interlocutory ..... that juncture that, the appellants filed i.a.no.2885 of 2015 in this appeal, contending that the proceedings initiated by the official liquidator will only scuttle the settlement efforts taken by them with the 1st respondent corporation and further ruin the scope of revival of the company with the assistance of an external investment partner who evinced .....

The Deputy Tahsildar, (RR) Kerala Financial Corporation and Another Vs ...

Court : Kerala

..... then filed w.p.c.no.657/2006 challenging exts.p7 and p8 notices. petitioners submit that, in the meantime, the kfc extended time for settlement under ots till 28/02/2006, but petitioners did not press the writ petition and the same was dismissed as withdrawn. petitioners thereafter remitted the entire ..... collection charges shall be deducted from the amount recovered and the balance alone shall be payable to the institution. (3) institutions except government departments accepting defaulted payments directly from the defaulter after initiating revenue recovery proceedings under the kerala revenue recovery act, 1968 (15 of 1968) and filing the certificate by the district ..... . kfc made a further demand for collection charges which came to be challenged. the learned single judge allowed the writ petition holding that the demand for payment of revenue recovery charges was illegal. 10. on the other hand, learned government pleader placed reliance on the judgment in david v. kerala state financial .....

Sachidanandhan Vs. Vijesh and Another

Court : Kerala

Reported in :

Cases Relied:
Dilip Bastimal Jain V Baban Bhanudas Kamble and others [AIR 2002 Bom 279].
Vimala Ammal V C. Susheela [AIR 1991 Mad 209].
Dwarka Prasad Singh v. Harikant Prasad Singh [(1973) 1 SCC 179 :. AIR 1973 SC 655].
P.P.S Pillai V Catholic Syrian Bnak [2000(3) KLT 629].
Peter Cherian v. Abraham [2007 (4) KLT 680].
Satheedevi v. Prasanna [2010(2) KLT 642 (SC)].
Ali Rowther v. Kochupennu [1986 KLT 718].
Kali Charanv. Janak Deo [A.I.R. 1932 Allahabad 694].
Babu Lal v. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal [A.I.R.1982 S.C.818].
Potter v. Sanders (6 Ha. 1).
Daniels v. Davison (17 Ves 433).
Holmes v. Powell (8 De G.M. and G. 572).
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. v. Nanak Builders and Investors (P) Ltd., (2013) 5 SCC 397.
(Kafiladdin case, AIR p. 68).
R.C. Chandiok v. Chuni Lal Sabharwal:AIR 1971 SC 1238:(1970) 3 SCC 140.
SCR p. 369 in Durga Prasad v. Deep Chand viz.
S.V.R. Mudaliar v. Rajabu F. Buhari, AIR 1995 SC 1607.

Cases Referred:
Bankim Chandra v. Anand Bazar Patrika [AIR (37) 1950 Calcutta 128].
Thanga Pandiyan v. S.R.Periaswami Thevar [1953 KHC 196: 1953 KLT 475, 2015 KHC 90.
Mohandas K. K. and others V Thankamma Pillai [2015 KHC 90].
Durga Prasad and Anr. v. Deep Chand and Ors. [AIR 1954 SC 75].
Appukuttan v. Kamalakshi [1996(2) KLT 977].
Dilip Bastimal Jain V Baban Bhanudas Kamble and others [AIR 2002 Bom. 279],
W.P. 6225 of 2007 of Bombay High Court, Chendivel R vs G Damodaran and others [AIR 2015 Mad 96], 2010(2) KLT 642 (SC).
Krishna Chandra Kabiraj and others V Sankaran Kabiraj and others [AIR 1950 Calcutta 128].
Chendivel R vs G Damodaran and others [2015 KHC 2237: AIR 2015 Mad 96].
Vigro Industries Pvt Ltd V Venturetech Solutions P Ltd : 2012(5) CTC 359.
State Bank of India V Cracure Pharmaceuticals Ltd : 2013 STPL (Web) 939

Comparative Citation:
2016 (1) KLT 75 (SN) (C.No.79),

..... for the hike in prices during the litigation, specific relief cannot be denied. on account of the conduct of the defendants, who suppressed the fact of execution of settlement deed in their counter statement to the injunction petition and thereafter deviated their stand in the written statement, the trial court found no bonafides in their version and did ..... 19(b) of the specific relief act, 1963 specific performance of a contract is enforceable against the subsequent transferee, who purchased the property with notice of the agreement, on payment of money without good faith. 32. in ali rowther v. kochupennu [1986 klt 718] a learned single judge of this court, after discussing a series of decisions ..... to what ought to be done. i may say that this maxim of equity had its strong roots not only in the english legal system but also had well laid in the indian legal system of the ancient time of manu and yagnavalkia. i shall quote west and buhler hindu law page 14: "all points of law, which .....

A. Parvathi Amma Vs. K.M. Gowri Amma and Others

Court : Kerala

..... court unless such objection was taken in the court of the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity and in all cases where issues are settled at or before such settlement and unless there has been a consequent failure of justice. he has brought to my notice the decision of the supreme court in kiran singh v. chaman paswan (air 1956 .....

State of Kerala, represented by The District Collector Vs. Thomas and ...

Court : Kerala

..... of market value in different areas by expert committees. 42. these statutes provide that such committees will be constituted with officers from the department of revenue, public works, survey and settlement, local authority and an expert in the field of valuation of properties, with the sub- registrar of the sub-registration district as the member secretary. they also provide for different .....

The State of Kerala rep. by Secretary, Forests and Wildlife Department ...

Court : Kerala

..... section 4 provided for issuance of notification whenever it is proposed to constitute any land as reserved forest. after various proceedings and determination of right by forest settlement officer, final notification is contemplated under section 19 declaring a reserved forest. section 19 is quoted as below: 19. when the proceedings prescribed in the preceding ..... a comprehensive survey and demarcate and measure 486.63 acres possession of which forest land was claimed by the petitioner. learned single judge further directed for payment of cost of rs.25,000/-. the state in its counter affidavit filed in the writ petition has pleaded that survey was already conducted and boundaries ..... public trust doctrine' which enjoins the state to protect the natural resources such as rivers, forests, seas shores, etc., for the purpose of protecting the eco system. the following was laid down by the apex court in paragraphs 25 and 34: 25. the public trust doctrine primarily rests on the principle that certain .....

Nanmanda Rural Co-Operative Housing Society Limited and Another Vs. K. ...

Court : Kerala

..... a comparative perspective certain provisions of the kerala co-operative societies act and the industrial disputes act, 1947. 38. chapter ix of the act deals with `settlement of disputes.' section 69 of the said chapter enumerates the disputes that can be decided by the co-operative arbitration court and registrar. the provision begins with ..... statutes in pari materia though made at different times, or even expired, and not referring to each other, they shall be taken and construed together, as one system and as explanatory of each other'. * * * the application of this rule of construction has the merit of avoiding any apparent contradiction between a series of ..... to the following effect: "12. on the doctrine of "pari materia", reference to other statutes dealing with the same subject or forming part of the same system is a permissible aid to the construction of provisions in a statute. see the following observations contained in principles of statutory interpretation by g.p. singh (8th .....