Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: payment and settlement systems act 2007 section 14 power to enter and inspect Page 83 of about 896 results (0.089 seconds)

Apr 04 1952 (HC)

V. Srinivasa Ayyangar Vs. the State of Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1953Mad190; (1952)2MLJ314

..... argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner on the basis that no logical principle can be discovered in the legislature making a distinction between pre-settlement minor inams and post-settlement minor inams does not appeal to us. it may not be possible to predicate the legislative policy underlying the enactment. if the minor inams can be ..... was the landholder, the learned judges stated thus:"the position therefore is that the agraharant here in question which is in kalahasti zamindari continued as before the permanent settlement to be held on an undertenure under the zamindar whose right has now become vested in the petitioner. in such circumstances, we can see no reason why ..... to the zamindari. at the time of the permanent settlement this l/16th part was included in the assets of the zamindari. at the time of the inam commission enquiry, the inam commissioner confirmed only 15/16th portion of the village on 31st december 1863 subject to a payment of jodi of rs. 142-14-4 and a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1990 (HC)

Kothari and Sons and Others Vs. N. Subramanian, Income-tax Officer, Ce ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1992]196ITR82(Mad)

..... one of these cases on october 11, 1982. messrs. kothari and sons, the first petitioner (a-1), in each of these cases had filed application for settlement before the settlement commission on november 3, 1982, which was permitted to be proceeded with by orders dated october 20, 1983. the second petitioner, d. c. kothari (a ..... merits of which the criminal court had no jurisdiction, the prosecution cannot be stayed. it was further observed that the power to grant immunity by the settlement commission was to be exercised sparingly and the criminal court cannot grant even temporary immunity by granting stay of prosecution. therefore, until immunity was granted, the ..... and, towards this end, try to buy those who remotely control the departmental echelons whose veto or green signal closes or opens the jurisdiction of the settlement commission and hushes or pushes the prosecutions. thus, section 245h, which clothes the commission with the power to grant immunity from prosecution.... is a magnet which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1917 (PC)

Raja Kumara Venkata Perumal Raju Bahadur Varu, Zamindar of Karvetinaga ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 43Ind.Cas.871

..... it prevails.' these passages show that even as regards the family usage of succession by primogeniture, the family could revert to the ordinary law after the permanent settlement. as regards the question of inalienability without the sovereign's sanction in case of military tenures, the reason for the restricted ownership ceasing as soon as the ..... case was the 14th ground besides, of course, the common ground of inalienability. that 14th ground is as follows:'admittedly there being no personal liability for the payment of the amount found due, the decree directing that the defendants do pay the plaintiffs the amount decreed is not sustainable in law.' for reasons given in appeals ..... ) is the principal amount due under the mortgage. as the plaintiffs are entitled to interest at 12 per cent.till the date 19th september 1913; fixed for payment on the real principal amount and as the lower court's decree allows only 6 per cent.interest between the date of the decree, 19th september 1913, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2001 (HC)

Kothari and Sons and ors. Vs. N. Subramanian

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2001]252ITR153(Mad)

..... paid only a paltry sum for signing such false vouchers as indicated in the seized documents.it is also the observation of the settlement commission that there is no evidence to show that no payment was made to the employees as indicated in the seized documents. this also is not the case of the prosecution.it is ..... relating to the individual assessment would not be applicable to the company against whom the complaints were filed. moreover, the finding given in those orders by the settlement commission will not have any bearing on the allegations contained in the complaint. furthermore, even in the individual assessment, no immunity has been granted in regard to ..... that the employees were not fictitious persons and there is no evidence to show that no payment was made to them and in the circumstances, the offer of additional items made by the directors is accepted. this finding of the settlement commission based on the very same seized materials is contrary to the allegations in the complaint .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2008 (HC)

Rajeev Goswami Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... regulation (amendment) act, 1964 no document evidencing any transaction for acquisition or possession of any land by way of transfer, exchange, lease, agreement or settlement shall be registered under the indian registration act, 1908 (act xvi of 1908) if it appears to the registering authority that the transaction has been effected ..... regulations provides that notwithstanding anything contrary in any law, usage, contract or agreement no person shall acquire or possess by transfer, exchange, lease, agreement or settlement any land in any area or areas constituted into belts or blocks in contravention of the provisions of sub-section (1).(3) from and after the ..... regulation (amendment) act, 1964 no document evidencing any transaction for acquisition or possession of any land by way of transfer, exchange, lease, agreement or settlement shall be registered under the indian registration act, 1908 (act xvi of 1908) if it appears to the registering authority that the transaction has been effected .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1884 (PC)

Vasudbv B. Pandit Vs. Narayan V. Joshi

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1885)ILR9Bom15

..... is not an 'amicable settlement' of that claim. as to the objection that the agreement provides for the payment of interest on any instalment remaining unpaid on the ground that the entire sum of rs. 578 is partly made up of interest, ..... and 46 of chapter vi leads us to the conclusion that the expression 'finally disposing of the matter' in sections 43 and 44 means no more than the expression 'amicable settlement' in sections 41 and 46; and it would be impossible, we think, not to hold that an arrangement which provides for a plaintiff's claim to be paid the ..... mortgage debt at once or to have the property sold, being settled by an agreement for the payment. of the debt in ten annual instalments with power to plaintiff in default of payment of any instalment to take possession and retain possession, until the debt has been satisfied out of the produce of the estate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1957 (HC)

State of Bombay Vs. Bai Moti and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1958Bom18; (1957)59BOMLR663; ILR1958Bom547

..... was envisaged by the legislature.14. the words 'before issues have been settled' are out of place quae the small cause suits, since the law does not require settlement of issues in small cause suits, clearly, therefore, these words could not have been intended by the legislature to govern a claim to refund of court-fee in ..... regular suits and they would be out of place in their application to small cause suits. they would be redundant quae the regular suits, as the stage of settlement of issues has already passed when the stage of recording evidence arrives. issues are always settled before evidence on merits is recorded. therefore, if the legislature intended that ..... commences with a plaint. the defendant files his written statement in answer to the plaintiff's claim. but in a suit of this type there is no stage of settlement of issues. the judge, while giving judgment, sets out the points for determination, records such evidence as the court thinks fit and proper and then gives judgment, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1975 (HC)

Monie Ardeshir Baria and Piloo F. Antia, Executrices of the Estate of ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1977]106ITR203(Bom)

..... has been described (at page 253 of the report) as settling properties absolutely and with full power alienation. it would appear, therefore, that although the word 'settlement' has been used in the judgment, the transaction was equivalent to an outright gift without any restrictions on the beneficiaries. further, it is clear that the point ..... from the deceased'. 107. the second submission in this regard is also equally fallacious. we are not concerned with consideration that flowed in respect of the payment of interest by the deceased. when section 46(1) refers to consideration, it is consideration for the debts in respect of which allowance is provided under section ..... adjudicated insolvent. the official assignee sold the stock-in-trade and had funds in his hands divisible among the insolvent's creditors. the plaintiff claimed preferential payment in respect of the amount of rs. 10,000 and the claim of the plaintiff appears to have been upheld. our attention was drawn to the observations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1969 (HC)

Cooper Engineering Ltd., Bombay Vs. D.M. Aney and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR201; (1971)ILLJ613Bom

..... is abundantly clear on a reading of each one of the clauses in the operative parts of these agreements that the settlement recorded in the agreements relating to the rights of the workmen to payment of wages including dearness allowance had the character of an interim relief. there was no agreement of any kind between the ..... also agrees not to raise any demands regarding wage-scales and/or dearness allowance, pending the deliberations and the final recommendations of the wage board in view of the settlement dated 1-11-1966 already signed by the parties.' 18. relying upon the phrase 'adjustable' contained in clause (10), mr. bhabha repeatedly sought to argue that ..... the same as the subject-matters of the disputes referred to arbitration under the impugned order of reference. the other reason is that the agreements record settlement of disputes by way of interim relief only and accordingly contain provisions that the terms contained therein will not continue to operate at any time beyond the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1931 (PC)

Raj Kumar Gobinda Naeayan Singh Vs. Sham Lal Singh

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1931)33BOMLR885

..... proving their title lies upon the respondents. the presumption arising from the permanent settlement has been considered by the board in several cases, but it is sufficient to cite a well-known passage from the judgment of lord parker in ranjit singh ..... integral part of the pandara estate, and that they are held by the achra branch subject to an annual payment of rs. 21-4-0. in the second place it is beyond dispute that at the permanent settlement the villages were included in pandara.3. under these circumstances their lordships have no doubt that the burden of ..... , and has been held by a branch of the pandara family from before the permanent settlement, subject to an annual payment to the zemindars, their lordships must conclude that the burden which is upon the respondents has not been discharged, the payment may, in its inception, have been a contribution towards the revenue assessed by the paramount .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //