Court : Chennai Madurai
..... duly adjusted by the third respondent bank towards the audit objected excess salary paid amount. as such there is no amount of rs.91,093/- as pending disbursement/settlement in the third respondent bank as stated in the affidavit of the petitioner. therefore, the order dated 02.05.2008 passed by the 2nd respondent is not illegal ..... general), public works department, chennai-5 vs. m.thanasekaran. 20. admittedly, time and again, this court and the honourable apex court very clearly held that if any excess payment was made to the employee, the higher authority of such employee having right to make recovery of the said excess amount, if the said excess amount was made by misrepresentation ..... salesman attached to the p.a.c banks, the pay fixation was decided under the g.o.ms.no.183 dated 16.06.1995 of the cooperative public distribution system, government of tamil nadu in the time scale of rs.430-10-450-15-525. subsequently, the village fair price shop salesman's pay scale structure was suitably .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... of admitted amount may vary. therefore, the parties may strike a deal for resolving the dispute and it is this deal that becomes known as settlement. but, in cases of settlement of arrears, the term 'settlement' connotes payment or payment terms. 49. but, the distinction stops there. every samadhan scheme has to be understood and interpreted in the light of the provisions contained in ..... from the year 2002 upto 2011, it was contended by mrs.r.hema latha, learned counsel for the appellant, that if the focus of the scheme was on the settlement of disputes, the respondents can demand payment of the admitted tax and allow waiver of a part of the disputed tax. if the focus of the scheme is for the ..... disputes, as can be seen from the title given to the act, namely, the tamil nadu sales tax (settlement of disputes) act, 2002. the focus of section 7 of the said act was on any tax in dispute or on payment of penalty in dispute or on any penalty in dispute or on any interest in dispute. 44. but the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... . meenakshisundaram, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and carefully perused the entire materials on record. 12. the first respondent has prayed for declaration that settlement dated 25.10.2010 executed by the petitioner in favour of the second respondent as null and void and also for relief of specific performance or in the ..... the same. the first respondent is not seeking to enforce his possession as per agreement of sale. the first respondent is praying for declaration that the settlement executed by the petitioner in favour of his son/second respondent is null and void and in respect of the relief of specific performance. the first ..... that an instrument by which movable or immovable property is transferred, comes within the expression conveyance . in the present case, an immovable property is transferred on payment of part of the consideration and handing over the possession of the property. it is relevant here to state that by the indian stamp (madhya pradesh second .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... leave petition. after the said order, the memo was filed, which has already been reproduced. what is disturbing is that the mtcl entered into a compromise/ settlement with the appellants and on the basis of the compromise entered into an agreement. in the agreement, as we notice, there is a reference to this court' ..... passed a resolution in favour of the petitioner requesting the authorities to provide a road map for the construction of service road by providing facilities like drainage system, water pipe system and light arrangements. the respondents had ignored the above resolution and had decided to construct the road over bridge without providing service road. 23.5. ..... which event, needless to mention that the respondents are at liberty to proceed afresh in terms of the act by following sections-8 and 15 thereof including payment of compensation for the land on today's market value, if not paid earlier to the petitioner. writ petitions are ordered on the above terms. connected .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... corporations will agree to avoid out sourcing work given through contract. subsequently the terms of the minutes were reiterated in the subsequent settlement. therefore once having agreed to avoid contract system, the impugned notification issued in the daily thanthi news paper for the items referred to above as called for sealed tender ..... work with regard to said limited 5 items through contractors the existing terms and conditions of service of the permanent employees as per 12(3) settlement will not be altered deter mental to their interest and they will not suffer. the contra allegations in this regard raised by the petitioner under point ..... out sourcing are inspected by the qualified technical supervisors of the respondent corporation and only after approval of the said work by the corporation supervisor, the payment is made by the corporation. so the 100% quality control is maintained by the respondent transport corporation. under these circumstances the contra allegations made under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... and other subsequent managing trustees to withdraw only interest from the fixed deposit and not to withdraw corpus fund/sale consideration and carry on charities as contemplated by settlement deed, dated 08.07.1901, executed by thoppulan chettiar, the great grandfather of present managing trustee, santhana gopalakrishnan. 4. facts of the case:- (i) ..... the suit property originally belonged to thoppulan chettiar. on 08.07.1901, he executed a settlement deed for carrying out charity by his descendants. in the suit property, he constructed a 'stone mandapam' and used to invite deity sri renganathaswamy during the gajendra ..... law and therefore, prayed for dismissal of the second appeal. 17. nobody entered appearance on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3, pursuant to non-payment of batta by the appellant. 18. the learned counsel for the fourth respondent submitted that the sale in favour of the fourth respondent would benefit the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... creative solution for quashing of proceedings under section 482 cr. p.c. 9. therefore, considering, a) the nature of relationship between the parties, b) nature of offences alleged c) the settlement arrived at and d) the ultimate result of the prosecution, this court is of the view that quashing of the first information report will be in the ends of justice ..... the respondent police. 4. learned counsel appearing for the parties filed a joint memo of compromise dated 15.07.2016, duly stating that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, under which the second respondent has agreed to withdraw the above case in crime no.863 of 2012 pending on the file of the first respondent. 5. the offence under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... of the government. (b) in the present case, the descendant of the original service doer viz., ponnuthaiyammal had participated in the enquiry before the settlement tahsildar and settlement tahsildar has also granted patta for the support of the temple and the deity chellandi amman under section 8(2)(ii) of the act 30 ..... said ponnuthaiyammal who participated in the enquiry proceedings, has not filed any appeal before the tribunal within the time stipulated. therefore, the order passed by the settlement tahsildar dated 25.2.1967 reached its finality. the descendant of the service doer viz., ponnuthaiyammal, having knowledge about the said concluded proceedings, had alienated the ..... date of purchase, now, the fifth respondent is interfering with their possession and enjoyment of their respective properties. when the petitioners had applied for the settlement land register prepared in the year 1914, it was found that the name of c.p.karuppanna pillai was struck out and the words "chellandi amman .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... this court held as follows: 12. at the time of argument, learned counsel also wanted to urge the question as to whether the second defendant is entitled to execute a settlement deed in favour of plaintiff, after canceling the will ex. b-22. the same is also raised as a substantial question of law. on the above submission, the following ..... has a case that the school as well as its assets were all acquired jointly by his parents and, therefore, second defendant alone is not competent to execute the settlement deed in favour of plaintiff. even the document ex. b-22 shows that the school all along remained as an asset of the second defendant. in fact, first ..... not binding on the family and can seek to recover possession." but, this kind of situation does not arise in this case. in view of the ex.a.1 settlement deed, minor became the absolute owner and minors property was sold by the natural guardian, without obtaining the court permission. as natural guardian, he is competent to sell the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... by filing sa.no.54/2010 and later on, it was dismissed as withdrawn in terms of one time settlement terms. the petitioner subsequently paid the balance sale consideration of rs. 3,50,25,000/- and after such payment, requested the respondents 3 and 4 axis bank to execute the sale deed, free of all encumbrances which ..... charitable trust, has sought clarification regarding sales tax deferred dues of the amount raised by commercial taxes department, trichy-20 on the bank. the sales tax issue/settlement to be taken care by the bank in order to ......[illegible]..35% advance amount today. bank clarified that the letter on demand from the sales tax department has ..... execute the sale deed free of all encumbrances and contrary to the said stand, they had sent the impugned communications, washing off their hands as to the settlement of the sales tax arrears and therefore, it should be held that their conduct is unreasonable and unsustainable and with a further direction, directing them to execute .....
Tag this Judgment!