Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 78 repeal and saving Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Page 23 of about 230 results (0.048 seconds)

Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Limited

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas129(Bom); [2008]82SCL303(Bom)

..... this section shall, so far as may be, also apply to a company in respect of which an order has been made before the commencement of the companies (amendment) act, 2002 sanctioning a compromise or an arrangement.393. information as to compromises or arrangements with creditors and members. -(1) where a meeting of creditors or any class ..... board of the applicant and despite the serious differences on critical issues all of which were unilaterally reflected in favour of ril. the said act by ril and its representatives is patently illegal and in breach of trust which ril and its representatives had vis-a-vis the applicant and the millions of persons who have ..... of ril.15. both the brothers with the mediation of their mother (mrs.kokilaben dhirubhai ambani) arrived at a memorandum of understanding/family arrangement dated 18.6.2005 (mou) and accordingly resolved their dispute amicably.16. based upon the said mou, both the brothers and the officials of ril and other group companies, made various .....

Pradeep Sadashiv Pavgi and ors. Vs. R.S. Luth Education Trust and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(1)BomCR677; 2008(1)MhLj919

..... for the petitioner/plaintiff has rightly pointed out that in view of the proviso added to section 115(1) of the civil procedure code by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1999, revision is not tenable because even if the conditional order would have been passed by the trial court, the suit would not have been finally disposed ..... , no leave, much less unconditional leave ought to have been granted to respondents for defending the suit filed by petitioner.i. that the learned trial court patently erred in law by granting unconditional leave for respondents to defend the suit filed by petitioner, more particularly when the claim of petitioner is time and again admitted ..... respondent no. 1 approached the petitioner for purchase of steel. petitioner accordingly supplied the steel at the site of the defendants from november, 2004 to march, 2005. it was agreed between the parties that bill raised by the petitioner has to be cleared and paid within thirty days and in case of delay in payment .....

Bimal Bhatt Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... record. in the case of ito v. itat their lordships of patna high court have also expressed a similar observation after holding that section 254(2) of the act empowers the tribunal to amend any order passed by it under sub-section (1) with a view to rectifying a mistake from record. however, section 254(2) does not authorize the tribunal to ..... cit v. gokul chand agarwal (1993) 202 itr 142 (cal) their lordships of calcutta high court have also held that section 254(2) to the income tax act, 1961 empowers the tribunal to amend its order passed under section 254(1) to rectify any mistake apparent from the record either suo motu or on an application. if in its order there is ..... four years of the date of an order to amend any order passed by it under section 254(1) of the act with a view to rectify any mistake apparent from record either suo motu or on an application made. what can be rectified under this section is a mistake which is apparent and patent. the mistake has to be such for which .....

Bank of Baroda Vs. Deepak Raghuvir Wagle and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR439; 2007(6)BomCR38; (2007)109BOMLR2245; 2008(2)MhLj381

..... quoted above casts duty on the plaintiff to serve the summons on the defendant after admission of the plaint.11. we have referred to various provisions of the letters patent, the civil procedure code and original side rules to show that the power to deal with a plaint lodged in the court is basically the power of the court, which has ..... at bombay, or the bombay city civil court.the power of the high court to frame rules to regulate its procedure is contained in clause 37 of the letters patent. clause 37 reads as under:clause 37. regulation of proceedingsand we do further ordain that it shall be lawful for the said high court of judicature at bombay from ..... and orders as far as possible by the provisions of the code of civil procedure, being an act passed by the governor general in council, and being act no. viii of 1859, and the provisions of any law which has been made amending or altering the same by competent legislative authority for india.perusal of clause 37 quoted above shows that .....

Vithal Shankar Dokhe Vs. Bhavdu Sakharam Dokhe Deceased Through His Le ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(1)BomCR300; 2007(6)MhLj662

..... petitioner is dated 15-7-1985. the petitioner either could have annexed copy of this order along with this petition or if so advised, could have made application for amendment of petition to annex copy of this order to the petition. the petitioner not having taken recourse to the said procedure, it will not be possible to accept ..... of said order dated 15-7-1985.7. it is not possible to accept this submission made by the petitioner. in first place, the petition has not been amended. it is not possible to accept any document which is tendered across the bar at the final hearing of the matter which was filed in the year 1987. order ..... not mandatory and the previous proceedings under the tenancy act between the same parties being landlords and tenants are sufficient to give notice to the landlord of the intention of the tenants to purchase the lands.9. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the said observation was patently illegal. he submitted that division bench of this court had .....

Rajhans Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)115TTJ(Mum.)779

..... shall apply as if the business is in existence in that previous year.the provisions of section 32(1) were also amended with effect from 1.4.1998, which are also being reproduced as under: (ii) know-how, patents, copyrights, trade marks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature, being intangible assets ..... in respect of building, plant and machinery or furniture is allowable under clause (i) of section 32(1) of the act. accordingly it has been pleaded that section 41(2) of the act only refers to the amended provisions of section 32(1)(i) and, therefore, such provisions would apply only to those cases where depreciation in respect ..... s first ground whether the lower authorities were justified in assessing the sum of rs. 2,25,37,301/- under section 41(2) of the income-tax act, 1961 (the act), which represented the insurance claim received by the assessee.2. briefly stated, the facts are these. the assessee started a windmill project in the assessment year .....

Sayyad Tahir HussaIn MainuddIn and Rahul Ramesh Ambesange Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR705; 2007(6)BomCR214; (2007)109BOMLR1906; 2007(6)MhLj633

..... the objection regarding verification of the disqualification application. however, while quashing the order of the collector to that extent, learned single judge has directed that amendment application filed by the petitioners by way of correction to the verification should be heard by the collector and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of ..... was not pressed into service. in all fairness, senior counsel shri shah also conceded that he was not pressing ground no. (i) for the purpose of present letters patent appeal. shri shah has pressed into service grounds at sr. nos. (ii) and (iv), ground no. (iv) being a corollary of ground no. (ii ..... was only evidence of the pleadings incorporated in the petition.in fact, we have commenced discussion regarding the difference in the schemes under representation of people act and disqualification rules, 1987, with our own conclusion that there are striking differences and, therefore, the ratio, conclusions or analogy in the decisions rendered .....

Neolite Polymer Industries Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(6)BomCR539; (2007)109BOMLR1930

..... grant of conditional leave is concerned except to the limited extent, which we shall shortly proceed to discuss.15. we have already noticed that due to amended provisions of the stamp act, the contentions of the applicants would hardly have any merits. wherever the bills were made in favour of a commercial bank, stamp duty would not ..... noticed is that where discretion has been exercised by the learned single judge, it should not be interfered with lightly, unless and until the impugned order suffers from patent, factual or legal infirmity and merely because the finding, at this stage, is a prima facie finding as to whether or not a triable issue arises for ..... after accepting the bills, became unconditionally liable to pay to the bank the principal amount of each bill, which was not paid. vide letter dated 22nd november, 2005, through its advocates, the bank called upon the defendant company to make payment of the principal amount with interest. another notice dated 7th april 2006 was sent to .....

Mr. Vajidali T. Kadri Vs. D.D. Shah and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR312]; (2008)ILLJ790Bom; 2007(6)MhLj650

..... a. no. 72 of 1998 held that the view taken by the learned single judge was wrong. the division bench observed that the industrial court refused the amendment and denied opportunity to the employer to justify its action. the division bench observed that it was a fit case where the employer could have been given an ..... practice, the labour court dismissed the complaint. 3. the appellant challenged the said order in the industrial court at thane vide revision application (ulp) no. 38 of 2005. by order dated 21/3/2006, the industrial court allowed the revision application. it set aside the order dated 10/12/2004 passed by the labour court, thane, ..... act'). according to the appellant, he was discharged without conducting any inquiry in utter disregard to the principles of natural justice. no chargesheet was served on him. it is his case that the respondents have discharged/dismissed him by way of victimization, not in good faith but in colourable exercise of the employer's rights for patently false .....

income Tax Officer Vs. Ranisati Fabric Mills P. Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)116TTJ(Mum.)177

..... . ltd. v. cit through which the controversy in this regard has been set at rest. the hon'ble punjab and haryana high court have held that the amendment by the finance act, 1987 was thus held to remedial in nature. the question of law raised before the hon'ble punjab and haryana high court is with regard to applicability of ..... officer be restored. 6. the appellant craves leave to amend or alter any ground or add a new ground which may be necessary.2. during the course ..... appreciating the fact that it is clearly not allowable in view of under section 43b of the it. act, 1961. 5. further, placed in the above factual and legal scenario, the impugned order of the learned cat (a) is the appellant prays, patently perverse and contrary to law and consequently merits to be set aside and that of the assessing .....