Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 78 repeal and saving Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 503 results (0.171 seconds)

Junglee Games India Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain ..... pradesh11, m.j sivani vs. state of karnataka12, high court of gujarat vs. gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat13, bharat hydro corporation ltd vs. state of10(1995) supp1scc59611 (2005) 2 scc51512 (1995) 6 scc28913 (2003) 4 scc712- 24 - assam14, varun gumber vs. union territroy of chandigarh15, b.p.sharma vs. union of inida16 ..... law expressed in 'videogames as a protected form of expression' published in georgia law review, vol. 40, no.1 (2005) pp153206 are instructive:"...courts have properly concluded that the first amendment protects video games as a form of expression. these games possess all the characteristics of an art form. first, like .....

Pacific Gaming Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain ..... pradesh11, m.j sivani vs. state of karnataka12, high court of gujarat vs. gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat13, bharat hydro corporation ltd vs. state of10(1995) supp1scc59611 (2005) 2 scc51512 (1995) 6 scc28913 (2003) 4 scc712- 24 - assam14, varun gumber vs. union territroy of chandigarh15, b.p.sharma vs. union of inida16 ..... law expressed in 'videogames as a protected form of expression' published in georgia law review, vol. 40, no.1 (2005) pp153206 are instructive:"...courts have properly concluded that the first amendment protects video games as a form of expression. these games possess all the characteristics of an art form. first, like .....

Pramod Kumar K Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain ..... pradesh11, m.j sivani vs. state of karnataka12, high court of gujarat vs. gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat13, bharat hydro corporation ltd vs. state of10(1995) supp1scc59611 (2005) 2 scc51512 (1995) 6 scc28913 (2003) 4 scc712- 24 - assam14, varun gumber vs. union territroy of chandigarh15, b.p.sharma vs. union of inida16 ..... law expressed in 'videogames as a protected form of expression' published in georgia law review, vol. 40, no.1 (2005) pp153206 are instructive:"...courts have properly concluded that the first amendment protects video games as a form of expression. these games possess all the characteristics of an art form. first, like .....

Pool N Club Vs. Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain ..... pradesh11, m.j sivani vs. state of karnataka12, high court of gujarat vs. gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat13, bharat hydro corporation ltd vs. state of10(1995) supp1scc59611 (2005) 2 scc51512 (1995) 6 scc28913 (2003) 4 scc712- 24 - assam14, varun gumber vs. union territroy of chandigarh15, b.p.sharma vs. union of inida16 ..... law expressed in 'videogames as a protected form of expression' published in georgia law review, vol. 40, no.1 (2005) pp153206 are instructive:"...courts have properly concluded that the first amendment protects video games as a form of expression. these games possess all the characteristics of an art form. first, like .....

Federation Of Indian Fantasy Sports (fifs) Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... tigadi, spl counsel) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to declare and hold the karnataka police (amendment) act, 2021 (karnataka act no.28 of2021 vide annx-a as unconstitutional, as being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under articles14(equality before law), article19(protection of certain ..... pradesh11, m.j sivani vs. state of karnataka12, high court of gujarat vs. gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat13, bharat hydro corporation ltd vs. state of10(1995) supp1scc59611 (2005) 2 scc51512 (1995) 6 scc28913 (2003) 4 scc712- 24 - assam14, varun gumber vs. union territroy of chandigarh15, b.p.sharma vs. union of inida16 ..... law expressed in 'videogames as a protected form of expression' published in georgia law review, vol. 40, no.1 (2005) pp153206 are instructive:"...courts have properly concluded that the first amendment protects video games as a form of expression. these games possess all the characteristics of an art form. first, like .....

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2012(4)CTC(IP)8; 2012(3)KCCR140(SN)

..... a process should be new and useful and that is also to be stated in describing the invention. section 5 of the 1970 act was omitted by the amendment act, 2005 with effect from 1st january 2005. section 5 restricted the grant of patents only to methods or process of manufacture. the definition of invention now includes product as well as a process.45. section 3 ..... for a term of seven years from 20th april 1998 which was initially valid upto 20th april 2005. however, with the enactment of the patents (amendment) act, 2002 and the framing of the patent rules, 2003, the plaintiffs patent bearing no.186857 has been subsequently extended for a period of twenty years from 20th april 1998 which expires on 20th april 2018. the certificate bearing no .....

Gurushanth Pattedar Vs. Mahaboob Shahi Kulburga Mills and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant377; ILR2005KAR2503; 2005(6)KarLJ270

..... division bench judgment in kalpana theatre's case held as under:'the scope of section 4 of the act in the context of the other provisions of law and particularly the amendment made by amendment act 12 of 1973 is admittedly wider than letters patent or the acts of the other states which were referred to or relied upon by the division bench in kalpana ..... of habeas corpus and petitions under articles 227 and 228 of the constitution are required to be dealt with by a single judge and the objects and reasons of the amending act do suggest that the legislature wanted such petitions to be dealt with by a single judge with a right of appeal to a bench of two judges. the learned ..... referred to as the act) and whether the full bench judgment of this court in ritz hotels (mysore) limited v. state of karnataka and ors., 1966 (7)klj 600 answering the aforesaid question in the affirmative lays down the correct law. when this appeal came up for hearing before two of us on 17.1.2005 the bench was of the .....

Mr. Shakeel Pasha Vs. M/s City Max Hotels

Court : Karnataka

..... duty as prevailing at the time of enforcement/execution of the arbitral award.5. learned counsel appearing for the decree holder would contend that the decree holder in terms of amended act paid stamp duty of rs.72,500/- and under protest, he has deposited rs.7,25,000/- which was imposed by way of penalty. referring to section 17 of ..... contended by the judgment debtors. therefore, he would contend that the decree holder has paid applicable stamp duty in terms of amended act. he would also point out that decree holder has paid stamp duty as applicable in terms of amended act and therefore, he would contend that nothing more due is payable by the decree holder.7. in support of his contention ..... in w.p.no.8352/2022 5 ilr1980kar 738 6 ilr2002kar 2347 7 (2000) 6 scc35912 would vehemently argue and contend that the impugned portion of the order is patently erroneous and the same is passed in complete contravention of well settled principle of law. referring to section 33 and 2(f) of karnataka stamp .....

M/s City Max Hotels (india )pvt Ltd Vs. Mr. Shakeel Pasha

Court : Karnataka

..... duty as prevailing at the time of enforcement/execution of the arbitral award.5. learned counsel appearing for the decree holder would contend that the decree holder in terms of amended act paid stamp duty of rs.72,500/- and under protest, he has deposited rs.7,25,000/- which was imposed by way of penalty. referring to section 17 of ..... contended by the judgment debtors. therefore, he would contend that the decree holder has paid applicable stamp duty in terms of amended act. he would also point out that decree holder has paid stamp duty as applicable in terms of amended act and therefore, he would contend that nothing more due is payable by the decree holder.7. in support of his contention ..... in w.p.no.8352/2022 5 ilr1980kar 738 6 ilr2002kar 2347 7 (2000) 6 scc35912 would vehemently argue and contend that the impugned portion of the order is patently erroneous and the same is passed in complete contravention of well settled principle of law. referring to section 33 and 2(f) of karnataka stamp .....

Management of International Instruments Vs. Labour Officer

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR3648

..... counsel for the workmen, however, contended that section 11 also applied to the number of holidays enjoyed by the workmen on the date of the amending ordinance/amending act. this contention has been specifically negatived in the above judgment and i am entirely in agreement with the said view. the language of the section is ..... the workmen. further, the ordinance has beensubsequently replaced by an act called the karnataka industrial establishments (national arid festival holidays)(amendment) act, 1985. it has come into force on 24 4-1985. the amendment is similar to the ordinance. in view of theprovisions ofthe act the petitioners have moved the labour officer for substituting first may ..... holiday was required to be given though the number of holidays given by the management was already more than what is required under section 3, is patently illegal and therefore his order increasing the number of holidays by one was without authority of law. 14. learned counsel submitted that the very fact .....