Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 71 substitution of new section for section 143 Court: karnataka Page 11 of about 632 results (0.592 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Vittal Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

G Lakshmanappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mr C V Manjunatha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Adarsh Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Aruachalam Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Erappa Shetty Vs. The Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Manjappagowda Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Hanumanthappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

K S Dayanandshetty Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //