Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 66 amendment of section 126 Year: 2005 Page 4 of about 972 results (0.257 seconds)

Dr. Devendra Gupta Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Reported in : (2006)282ITR18(Jodh.)

..... 'ble jurisdictional high court in the case of addl. cit v. ganeshilal lalchand . we are conscious of the elongation of the scope of reassessment by direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1987, w.e.f.1st april, 1989. however, we find that section 147 mandates the basic condition that "if the ao has reason to believe that any income ..... before us copies of bank pass book in which the assessee had allegedly deposited money which were admittedly with the revenue. from the abovereferred letter dt. 18th aug., 2005 written by the ito, ward-1, sriganganagar, placed by the learned departmental representative on record today, it is clearly borne out that no such pass books are available ..... in entirety. the case was adjourned and on the next date of hearing, the learned departmental representative placed on record a copy of the letter dt. 18th aug., 2005 written by the concerned ito, ward 1, sriganganagar, intimating that only pages from sl. nos. 1 to 6 of the assessee's statement were available and though at .....

Can FIn Homes Limited Vs. Mitre Specialised Services (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT639; 2005(80)DRJ739

..... that he had no concern with the loan.16. as held by this court in the decision : air1985delhi464 mohd.shamim farooqi and anr. v. delhi wakf board, amendment can be allowed notwithstanding that it withdraws an admission made by a party. as clarified by their lordships of the supreme court, in the decision : air2000sc614 b.k. ..... , mode of calculation of interest, rate of interest etc. etc. in any case, it is submitted that plaintiff's figures disclosed after allegedly computing interest are patently wrong and denied. plaintiff is not entitled to charge interest @ 16.5% per annum compounded on monthly basis. same is illegal and/or otherwise is forbidden by ..... pay suit amount either towards principal or interest. plaint does not disclose the correct factual status for the principal amount and/or towards interest accrued thereupon. plaintiff cannot act both way. once the plaintiff has chosen to file a suit under order 34 cpc, it is bound to disclose the amount of interest, accrued/fallen due .....

Thiru Alankadu Immudi Ahora Dharma Sivachariar Aiyra Vaisya Madam Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2005(4)CTC664; (2005)4MLJ258

..... of the decision reported in 2001 (4) ctc 174 (tamil nadu electricity board v. tamil nadu alloy foundry co. ltd.), rendered by this court, that the application for amendment seeking for new relief should have been filed within the period of limitation, namely, three years and, as such, the order impugned is valid.4. substantiating his plea, learned ..... in the application under order 6 rule 17 c.p.c., the trial court has found that there is a change of cause of action also. this finding is patently wrong. even in the plaint, the plaintiff specifically averred that the madam/plaintiff was the owner of the property. on the strength of the said pleading already made ..... plaintiffs is barred by limitation, there is dispute and it is not an admitted fact. while the defendants pleaded that under entry 58 of the schedule to the limitation act, the declaration sought for by the plaintiffs in this case ought to have been within three years when the right to sue first accrued, the plaintiffs contend that .....

Dr. Naresh Agarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3745; 2005(4)ESC2489

..... the constitution of india, specifically when academic council and the executive council in control of the university on date have been reconstituted by the amending acts of 1951 read with the amending act of 1965, the constitutionality whereof has been upheld by the hon'ble supreme court only after coming to the conclusion that aligarh muslim university ..... done under the resolution of the admission committee dated 10.1.2005, the resolution of academic council dated 15.1.2005 and the decision of the executive council dated 19.1.2005. it is contended that. section 2(1) and section 5(2)(c) of the amending act have the effect of virtually over ruling the judgment of the ..... students on the basis of religion only and any decision in that regard, being hit by article 29(2) of the constitution of india, would be patently illegal and without jurisdiction.63. the objection with regard to locus and the writ petitions having been infructuous because of subsequent developments may also be dealt with.64 .....

Dhananjay Mahto and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR1(Jhr)]

..... keeping in view such statement of objects and reasons, a new part ix relating to panchayats was inserted in the constitution by the constitution (seventy-third amendment) act, 1982, comprised of article 243 to article 243-o. those provisions do not apply automatically to the scheduled areas and tribal areas. article 243-m ..... committee, then the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the impugned provisions amount to an untenable 100% reservation seems to be patently unanswerable. by the amended provisions of the ordinance in the respective villages where the office of the mukhiya would, by the collector, be reserved for scheduled castes and ..... 1961, revised and enlarged edition, 2003. the court has also gone through another book 'inside jharkhand' by dr. sunil kumar singh (crown publication), 1st edition, 2005. from the aforesaid books, the following facts emerge.35. the tribal population of jharkhand is 7,087,068 (2001 census). the tribal living in jharkhand are santhal, .....

Samadhi Dass and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)141PLR744

..... present writ petition, is whether judgments and decrees of civil courts, passed before the coming into force of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amending act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the amending act, 1976'), are binding upon the gram panchayat and if so to what extent.3. the petitioners herein filed a civil suit no. 5 of ..... order dated 15.4.1991, this court allowed the aforementioned writ petition and set-aside the orders of the collector and the commissioner. the gram panchayat preferred letter patent appeal no. 376 of 1992, gram panchayat village mavi sappan v. the joint director panchayats punjab and ors. the said appeal was dismissed, vide order dated 10 ..... 1987 area allowed and the orders impugned therein are set aside. the parties, through their counsel, are directed to appear before the collector on 22.6.2005. the collector shall make every endeavour to dispose of the case within a period of six months from the date any of the parties produces a certified copy .....

Raghu Sharma Vs. University of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1993; 2005(3)WLC581

..... as member of the syndicate of the university of rajasthan by vice chancellor under his powers conferred under section 21 (1) (iv) of the university of rajasthan act. this averment is patently false and shri raghu sharma was nominated vide order dated 25.8.2003 issued by the education department, govt. of rajasthan under section 21 (1) (viii) ..... and concealed the material facts. the petitioner has not challenged the impugned order and only challenged communication made by the registrar of university. now by way of amendment the petitioner wanted to challenge the order passed by the state government and deviate from the stand taken in the original writ petition.20. as it is held ..... to challenge the order dated 08.7.2004 and after receipt of the reply filed on behalf of respondent no. 3 the petitioner only became wise and filed amendment application.12. so far as concealment of facts are concerned, upon perusal of the reply it reveals that the respondent no. 3 after his nomination vide order .....

Aibunnisha Vs. Masrur Alam

Court : Patna

..... in which it was held that the court has got the power to allow the relief of possession even without a formal order of amendment as in terms of section 55(1)(f) of the transfer of property act, the seller is obliged to give possession of the property to the buyer, and in case where the deed of transfer is executed ..... for sale of suit property without a claim for delivery of possession, cannot be treated as a 'suit for land' and is, therefore, triable under clause 12 of letters patent of bombay high court and that in a suit for land no order for delivery of possession can be validly passed without any such relief having been sought by the ..... decree-holder (o.p.) filed his rejoinder to the aforesaid supplementary petition of the judgment-debtor (petitioner) on 14.8.1994.6. by the impugned order dated 5.1.2005 the learned court below has allowed the petition of the decree-holder (o.p.), rejected the objection of the judgment-debtor (petitioner) and directed delivery of possession in favour of .....

Mehtani K.K. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)IIILLJ832P& H

..... parties and have also perused the pleadings and have gone through the orders impugned before this court. after giving thoughtful consideration and examining the effect of the amendment carried out to the word 'employee' and also taking into consideration the definition of the word 'wages', i am of the considered opinion that the ..... services of the petitioner were terminated with effect from may 5, 1981, he was drawing monthly wages at the rate of rs. 1180/-. by virtue of the amendment, the wages stood defined as 'rupees one thousand and six hundred'. thus, the petitioner fell within the beneficial mischief of the definition. resultantly, the petitioner ..... became entitled to the gratuity as payable under the act. the finding upon issue no. 1 is patently erroneous.8. learned counsel has further argued that so far as the question of limitation is concerned, the application could not have been .....

Birat Chandra Dagra Vs. Taurian Exim Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2006(II)OLR344

..... ltd. and ors. : air2004sc5152 . according to mr. indrajit mohanty, learned counsel for the respondent after amendment of section 100-a, c.p.c. by act 22 of 2002 with effect from 01.07.2002, jurisdiction conferred under clause 10 of the letters patent applicable to orissa high court is no more invokable in ah appeal of the present nature and that ..... issue is decided accordingly to admit the appeal.since the respondents have already entered appearance, the l.p.a. be listed accordingly.misc. case no. 36 of 200520.04.2005-heard.this application has been filed to temporarily dispense with filing of certified copy of annexure-7, i.e., the copy of the order-sheets in interim application no. ..... of that undertaking, we dispense with filing of the certified copy at this stage.the misc. case is disposed of accordingly.misc. case no. 35 of 200520.04.2005-this application under chapter-vi, rule 27-a of orissa high court rules has been filed to stay operation of the order of the trial court impugned in f.a .....