Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 66 amendment of section 126 Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.104 seconds)

Jun 28 1988 (HC)

Indian Bank Vs. Datta Venkata Chinna Krishna Raju

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-28-1988

Reported in : [1989]65CompCas451(AP)

..... to achieve different objects altogether. on the above reasoning, the learned judge held that section 21a does not, and cannot have the effect of repealing the said madras (amendment) act - a state law covering the field of agricultural indebtedness, which is a state subject. we do not propose to go into the correctness of the said decision which ..... the united kingdom or due to any corporation formed in pursuance of any special indian law or royal charter or letters patent' are declared to be exempted from the operation of the general provisions contained in the act. insertion of such a provision was made by the ultimate political authority which the britishers held over us in those ..... parliament of the united kingdom or of any special indian law or royal charter or letters patent' was not applicable to the indian bank constituted by act 5 of 1970. the decision in krishna murthy's case, air 1983 ap 347, held that those words 'special indian law' refer to enactments of imperial parliament .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 1988 (HC)

Dhronamrajti Satyanarayana Vs. N.T. Rama Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-1988

Reported in : AIR1988AP62

..... theatres and they were in turn certified by the commissioner of police. as the two theatre belong to the family members of the first respondent, the patent infirmities relating to the period of limitation, the non-disclosure of the full particulars relating to the days when the shows were claimed to have been ..... access to the judicial system or statutory provisions incorporating the directive principles of state policy for amelioration of their condition, (ii) preventing or annulling executive acts and omissions violative of constitution or law resulting in substantial injury to public interest.' personal rights could not be enforced in the garb of public interest ..... ., for this purpose unless the petitioner was directed to put his house in order by properly amending the affidavit and seeking appropriate relief, this court should not proceed any further in the matter. if pleadings are properly amended, the learned counsel said, the 1st respondent would be in a position to meet them. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1988 (HC)

P. Narasaiah Vs. P. Rajoo Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-29-1988

Reported in : AIR1989AP264

..... relating to the execution, discharge or satisfaction of the decree, shall be determined by the court executing the decree and not by a separate suit. (2) xx (omitted by amendment act,1976 w.e.f. 1-2-1977). (3) where a question arises as to whether any person is or is not the representative of a party, such question shall, ..... set out section 47, sub-rules (1) and (2) of rule 1 of order xxi, rule 2 of order xxi, c.p.c., as amended by the amendment act, 1976, as well as article 125 of the limitation act. they read thus : section 47, c.p.c. : '47. (1): all questions arising between the parties to the suit in which the decree ..... however, when the matter came up before the division bench, counsel for the judgment-debtor did not argue the question as to the constitutionality of article 125 of the limitation act. the arguments before the division bench-- comprising of amareswari and upendralal waghray, jj. -- centered round the question indicated at the inception of this judgment, viz., whether a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //