Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 57 amendment of section 107a Year: 2021 Page 3 of about 269 results (0.753 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Srinivas V Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Sharadamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Prakashnath Vs. State By Special Public Prosecutor

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Priyadarshini Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri T Krishna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Uma Balagavi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Lakshmichand Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //