Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 57 amendment of section 107a Year: 1983

Ramdhan Vs. Bhanwarlal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1985Raj185; 1983()WLN439

..... notwithstanding anything contained in the letters patent of the high court or any other law for the time being in force. the bill also proposed for deletion of chapter iv-a of part vi of the act relating to appeals. however, when the bill finally emerged from the parliament and was enacted as amending act no. 47 of 1966, clause ..... the letters patent against an order passed by a single judge of the high court under section 39(1) and it was argued before their lordships that an intra court appeal was not prohibited. 33. their lordships of the supreme court took notice of the fact that the arbitration act of 1940 was a consolidating and amending act and was ..... to avoid all possible delays in the disposal of election petitions filed in respect of legislative assembly and parliamentary elections that drastic changes were made in the act by the amending act no. 47 of 1966 and changed the forum of trial of the election petition from the district judge to the high court in the hope and expectation .....

Cadar Constructions Vs. Tara Tiles

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom258; 1984(2)BomCR530; 1984MhLJ603

..... historical knowledge that on 19th of december 1961. this union territory was liberated, conquered in international law. by the government of india. by the constitution (12th amendment) act, passed by the parliament, this union territory was made a part of the republic of india with effect from 20th of december 1961. due to the integration ..... difficulties the president of india issued directions and promulgated regulations from time to time. we may refer to the relevant ones for understanding the points arising in this letters patent appeal. the goa. daman and diu (laws) regulation 1962. hereinafter referred to as regulation no. 12 of 1962. was promulgated by the president of india. ..... present case will be governed by article 14 of schedule to the limitation and applies the suit is barred by time entitled to show even in this letter patent appeal, that the said finding erroneous on the facts of this case is undoubtedly right in this contend with the object of showing that was within time .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Rameshwar Prasad Kishan Gopal

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in : (1983)6ITD311(All.)

..... apply on all fours to the facts of the present case. apart from this, the case of the assessee is additionally clinched by the opium (u.p. amendment) act, 1982, which retrospectively amended the opium act, 1878, with effect from 1-7-1969 and under which, inter alia, section 5 a was inserted to the following effect: (1) there shall be levied ..... kishan gopal's case (supra) and cit v.j.k. synthetics ltd. [1983] 143 itr 771. next, he referred to the opium (u.p. amendment) act, 1982, which had retrospectively amended the opium act, 1878, with effect from 1-7-1969 and the levy of excise duty on poppy heads at the rates specified in the erstwhile rule 42a had been ..... department was claiming excise duty and the assessee was debiting the duty in accounts. the judgment of the hon'ble high court had been appealed against by way of letters patent appeal.on those facts, after considering the decision of the supreme court in the case of kedarnath jute mfg. co. ltd. (supra) and its own decision in cit .....

Watt Vs. Western Nuclear, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... ." case note, 18 land & water l.rev. 201, 216 (1983). [ footnote 2/4 ] by the phrase "general mining laws," i refer primarily to the mining act of 1872, as amended, 30 u.s.c. 21 et seq., which declares that "all valuable mineral deposits in lands belonging to the united states . . . shall be free and open to ..... [ footnote 11 ] this is evident from the provisions in the act prescribing standards to govern the joint use of srha lands by owners of surface ..... 30 u.s.c. 90. the agricultural entry act of 1914 permitted the acquisition of lands withdrawn from entry, or classified as valuable, because of the phosphate, nitrate, potash, oil, gas, or asphaltic minerals they contained, but provided that patents would reserve to the united states all such minerals. 38 stat. 509, as amended, 30 u.s.c. 121 et seq. .....

Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1985Mad130

..... the loss, destruction, damage or deterioration occurred. according to the learned counsel, s. 80 of the rlys. act as amended by the amending act no. 39 of 1961 has the effect of excluding the operation of s. 20 c.p.c. and cl. 12 of the letters patent. the learned counsel referred to s. 4 of the c.p.c. and argued that the rlys ..... . act i a special enactment should prevail over the provisions of the civil p.c. and the letters patent. if ..... railways act, as amended by the amending act no. 39 of 1961, should be taken to have repealed s. 20 of the civil p.c. and cl. 12 of the l. p., in so far as suits for compensation against the railways are concerned in accordance with the provisions contained in s. 4(1) c.p.c. and cl. 44 of the letters patent. further .....

Krishna Kumar Damani Vs. RamnaraIn Agarwal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1984Cal162

..... or the district court's powers for withdrawing to itself any suit, appeal or proceedings pending in any court subordinate to it.43. section 24 (5) of the amendment act of 1976 taking a wider view in the interest of expedition no doubt, now permits a suit or proceedings to be transferred under section 24(5) of the civil procedure code ..... third subordinate judge. alipore. to this court under clause 13 of the letters patent and section 24 of the code of civil procedure is strenuously contested by the respondent no. 1-landlord. the respondent no. 2 has not contested the proceeding.11. the ..... of the suit premises. it is denied that the balance of convenience is in favour of crantinc of a transfer order and contended that clause 13 of the letters patent has no application to the instant proceedings.10. in this background, this application for withdrawal of the eviction suit no. 60/82 pending in the 'court of the .....

BaldwIn Girls' High School, Bangalore and etc. Vs. Corporation of the ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1984Kant162; 1984(2)KarLJ218

..... the corporation had exempted the buildings of the three schools from payment of property-tax.(iii) the act was amended by act 10 of 1966 with effect from 1-4-1966. by s. 21 of the amending act that portion of s. 101 (c) which empowered the corporation to exempt institutions run on philanthropic ..... ratio of the aforesaid decision.12. (1) the question, therefore, for consideration is whether the provisions of the act, as amended with effect from 1/4/1966 brought about any such patent discrimination against government recognised educational institution not receiving financial aid from the government.(2) in order to find out the ..... amended on 1-4-1966 and as it now stands under the 1976 act. the provisions unmistakably indicate that the legislative intention has always been to grant exemption from payment of property tax in respect of buildings belonging to private educational institutions used exclusively for educational purposes. in particular this intention is patent in s. 110 of, 1976 act .....

In Re: Bengal National Textile Mills Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1986]59CompCas956(Cal)

..... government, if applied for, will be withheld. on this aspect, the scheme may need further amendment. in the event such sanction is not ultimately granted, the scheme will become void. i do not find the scheme to be patently illegal.46. a contention has been raised that the creditors of the company should be divided into ..... likely to be disposed of before the meeting.7. the company has since applied for amendment of its application under section 391 of the act and also for amendment of its proposed scheme. directions for calling a fresh meeting for consideration of the amended scheme has also been prayed for.8. the meeting convened for july 23, 1983, ..... the court had advertised sale of the assets of the company inviting tenders. at this stage, a creditor moved an application under section 391 of the companies act for convening a meeting of the shareholders and creditors of the company to consider a scheme of compromise and arrangement. the secured creditors appeared and opposed the application .....

Eknath Kira Akhadkar and ors. Etc. Vs. Administrative Tribunal and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom144

..... , a stature should not be construed as to create new disabilities or obligations or impose new duties in respect of transactions which were complete at the time the amending act came into force, the amended s. 22 cannot be construed as having retrospective effdcrs. also as held by the supreme court in the case of moti ram v. suraj bhan : [1960]2scr896 ..... of the application. a plain reading of the aforesaid provision is sufficient to show that the same is necessarily to be construed as prospective, for its retrospective operation is patently impracticable. it indeed requires the tenant to pay or tender to the landlord or deposit with he controller the arrears of rent up to the date of the payment together ..... 165/b/75, 28/b/77, 136/b/78 , 19/b/79, 19/b/77, 19/b/82 and 2/b/77 submit that the petitionerintend to prefer letters patent appeal and as such ,pray that the execution of the eviction orders be stayed for four weeks. the execution of the above order is accordingly stayed, but for a period .....

Rasulmiya Rehmanmiya Vs. Patel Lalbhai Shankerbhai

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1983)1GLR714

..... application was prescribed by rule 15a of the bombay tenancy and agricultural land rules, 1956 to be one year from the date on which the amending act came into force. that the said act had come into force on 3-3-1973 and hence the application as filed by the petitioner on 17-2-76 was barred by limitation ..... which he entertained the application under section 32(1b) the application filed by the petitioner was obviously time barred and incompetent.the gujarat revenue tribunal had, therefore, patently erred in law in holding that the order of the mamlatdar under section 32(1b) was misconcieved and without jurisdiction. the tribunal was equally wrong in taking the ..... view that the collector erred in confirming such a patently illegal order. the tribunal ought to have hold that the order of the mamlatdar could be well sustained in exercise of his suo motu powers under section 32 .....