Court : Chennai Madurai
Decided on : Apr-22-2016
..... 3 m.l.j., the r.c.diocese of madurai vs. madurai city municipal corporation, which case arise out of the exemption granted under section 122 (c) as amended by act 42 of 1994, that was the case which is a church as well as seminary where a building which was utilised, whether it was within the purview of 122 ..... , corporation of madurai, whether the levy could be made beyond a period of six years in view of amendment into act 37 of 2008, by substituting 12 years retrospectively. there, this hon'ble court, held that even if the amendment is made it cannot be done it in a retrospective manner and it can only be done in a prospective ..... such tax. further, the petitioner school has got huge buildings which are not assessed to property tax as per section 122 (c) of the municipal city municipal corporation act, 1971. they are exempted from payment of property tax and there are no other enabling provision thereby authorizing the respondent municipal corporation to revoke such exemption. therefore, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-26-2016
..... the tribunal, the said original application was transferred to the high court and renumbered as w.p.no.33784 of 2006. the petitioner also amended the prayer sought for, to call for the records relating to the letter no.30458/r2/94-10 dated 14.06.1995 and quash the ..... file of this court and re-numbered as w.p.no.33784 of 2006. 4. pending disposal of the writ petition, the prayer was amended before this court and the respondent/petitioner has challenged the order of the first respondent dated 14.06.1995, by which, the petitioner's service ..... the respondent therein to regularise her service from the date of initial appointment namely 31.12.1981 and subsequently, a petition was filed to amend the prayer seeking for regularisation of service atleast from the date of re-appointment in 1984. 3. the specific contention of the respondent/petitioner ..... (prayer: writ appeal filed under clause 15 of the letter patents act against the order dated 16.04.2010 in w.p.no.33784 of 2006.) huluvadi g. ramesh, j. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jun-16-2016
..... governed by the procedure prescribed by the rules made in exercise of the powers of the chartered high courts under clause 37 of the letters patent. interestingly, section 652 of this act itself empowered the high courts to make rules , suggesting that consistency with the code was a sine qua non only when making rules for ..... finding as against the applicants herein, either in the vigilance enquiry and in other proceedings, to the effect that the applicants herein are responsible for the tampering and amending the cause title in the ep. further, the said vigilance report revealed that the interpolation was committed by one mrs.t.r.indra, a staff of this ..... was conducted and that the respondent was not even examined as a witness. in this regard, the learned counsel for the applicants relied upon the judgment reported in (2005) 4 scc 370 (igbal singh marwah vs. meenakshi marwah). for the same proposition, the learned counsel for the applicants has also relied upon the judgment reported in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-12-2016
..... conclusion and disposal of the ongoing dispute arising out of the multi-annual agreement dated 04.05.2011, addendum a dated 04.05.2011, amendment dated 30.09.2011 and supplementary agreement dated 25.04.2013, the purchase orders / project agreements pursuant to the multi-annual agreement between the ..... confidentiality:- for the purposes of this clause, confidential information means any proprietary information of the company, including but not limited to information relating to intellectual property rights, patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, know-how and the following types of information: technical data research, product plans, products, services, customer lists, software, developments, ..... on any court, in which, the consultation takes place with the lawyers. similarly, signing of application under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, also does not confer any jurisdiction. 11. coming to the terms of the letter of appointment, clause 8 can be invoked only .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-12-2016
..... the principal secretary to government and his staff whose names not known and the concerned police officers of the first respondent under section 218 of ipc.) (prayer amended as per the order of this court, dated 05.04.2016 made in m.p.no.2 of 2015 in crl.o.p.no.22953 of 2015). 1 ..... by abusing their powers, they have made authorities to believe their statement as correct, thereby, had pecuniary advantage for themselves, which are patently offence punishable under ipc and the prevent of corruption act. in this regard, the petitioner made a detailed complaint to the first respondent by speed post with acknowledgement due on 24.08.2015 ..... officers suppressed the fact of their purpose of visit and have availed concessional rates. learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that under the right to information act, the petitioner obtained log-sheet, which shows that the officers have travelled long distance and claimed that they have travelled only short distance. learned counsel made .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-15-2016
..... mayiladuthurai and after filing of the fresh applications on 04.08.1985, the appellant filed additional counter on 02.01.1989. subsequently, by amendment act 39 of 1990, the appointed date was shifted from 19.06.1971 to 01.04.1990. (iii) all the applications were numbered as ..... p.nos.21131 and 21133 of 1994, it was contended on behalf of the writ petitioner that under section 1(2) of the act, when the act itself is not applicable to a municipal town, the order of the first respondent granting patta in favour of the respective individuals, is ..... writ petitioner/appellant, the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant, by drawing a comparison to section 5 along with section 12 of the act, contended that while the authorised officer had every power and jurisdiction to summon and enforce the attendance of witnesses and acceptance of any ..... (prayer: appeals filed under clause 15 of the letters patent, against the order dated 22.04.2003 passed by this court in w.p.nos.21136, 21128, 21134, 21127, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-15-2016
..... mayiladuthurai and after filing of the fresh applications on 04.08.1985, the appellant filed additional counter on 02.01.1989. subsequently, by amendment act 39 of 1990, the appointed date was shifted from 19.06.1971 to 01.04.1990. (iii)all the applications were numbered as ..... p.nos.21131 and 21133 of 1994, it was contended on behalf of the writ petitioner that under section 1(2) of the act, when the act itself is not applicable to a municipal town, the order of the first respondent granting patta in favour of the respective individuals, is ..... writ petitioner/appellant, the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant, by drawing a comparison to section 5 along with section 12 of the act, contended that while the authorised officer had every power and jurisdiction to summon and enforce the attendance of witnesses and acceptance of any ..... (prayer: appeals filed under clause 15 of the letters patent, against the order dated 22.04.2003 passed by this court in w.p.nos.21136, 21128, 21134, 21127, 21129 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-29-2016
..... before execution of sale deed in favour of the first plaintiff, the defendant has to obtain no objection certificate from the concerned income tax department. as per the amended provision of income tax act, 1961, the income tax department has become the owner. after obtaining no objection certificate from the income tax department, the defendant has left to america and the ..... prayer in o.s.a.no.193 of 2007: this appeal is preferred under order xxxvi rule 9 of o.s.rules r/w clause 15 of the letters patent act against the order of this court dated 31.10.2006 in c.s.no.1269 of 1994, insofar as the judgment and decree relates to the findings that the ..... precluded from adducing evidence in respect of suit sale agreement dated 18.10.1988. 30. at this juncture, the court has to look into the decision reported in air 2005 sc 439 (janki vashdeo bhojwani and another v. indusland bank ltd., and others), wherein the hon'ble supreme court has held that power of attorney cannot depose evidence instead .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-10-2016
..... has disposed of the writ petition no.22684 of 2009 by way of deducing the following observations: i. the trustees have power to amend the object of the trust and there is no necessity to seek permission from the civil court under section 92 of c.p. ..... to the fourth respondent, director of collegiate education, chennai and thereby recommended invocation of section 14a of the tamil nadu private colleges regulation act,1976. on 10.8.2009, the management of the college applied for minority status and the first respondent has granted minority status by ..... of minority status by the impugned order would continue to be governed by the provisions of the tamil nadu private colleges and regulation act and rules etc., as a private institution." against the order passed by the learned single judge, the writ petitioner has filed writ ..... (prayer in both writ appeals: writ appeals filed under clause 15 of letters patent against the order dated 20.3.2012 passed in w.p.no.22684 of 2009.) common judgment: .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-10-2016
..... has disposed of the writ petition no.22684 of 2009 by way of deducing the following observations: i. the trustees have power to amend the object of the trust and there is no necessity to seek permission from the civil court under section 92 of c.p. ..... to the fourth respondent, director of collegiate education, chennai and thereby recommended invocation of section 14a of the tamil nadu private colleges regulation act,1976. on 10.8.2009, the management of the college applied for minority status and the first respondent has granted minority status by ..... of minority status by the impugned order would continue to be governed by the provisions of the tamil nadu private colleges and regulation act and rules etc., as a private institution." against the order passed by the learned single judge, the writ petitioner has filed writ ..... (prayer: in both writ appeals: writ appeals filed under clause 15 of letters patent against the order dated 20.3.2012 passed in w.p.no.22684 of 2009.) common judgment: .....
Tag this Judgment!