Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 57 amendment of section 107a Page 11 of about 1,464 results (0.545 seconds)

United States Vs. First National Bank of Detroit

Court : US Supreme Court

..... "mixed blood." it was stipulated that, in administering the bureau of indian affairs under the clapp amendment, and especially in issuing patents thereunder, the department had not required any statement as to the quantum of foreign blood, but had issued patents upon the showing that the applicant was a mixed blood. several instances were shown by the records ..... reservation, and to allot them to members of the band, and o-bah-baum, an indian woman of that tribe, had been given a trust patent, as provided for by the act of february 8, 1887, supra, and had given a mortgage to the defendant in that case upon such land, she had no right or authority ..... legislative enactments. if the effect of the legislation has been disastrous to the indians, that fact will not justify the courts in departing from the terms of the act as written. if the true construction has been followed with harsh consequences, it cannot influence the courts in administering the law. the responsibility for the justice or .....

V. Appannammanayuralu Vs. B. Sreeramulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1978AP160

..... provision in regard to the pecuniary limits of jurisdiction also in s. 21. in consequence, sub-sec. (2) has been added by the c. p. c. (amendment) act, 1976 which reads as follows:'no objection as to the competence of a court with reference to the pecuniary limits of its jurisdiction shall be allowed by any appellate or ..... decree passed by the court, unless such over-valuation or under-valuation has prejudicially affected the disposal of the suit or appeal on its merits. this section is patently founded on the principle that a court's decree shall not be affected on the ground of its lack of pecuniary jurisdiction if it had inherent jurisdiction to ..... not suffer from inherent lack of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal when it was presented before it. the judgment-debtor, aggrieved by that decision, has filed this letters patent appeal.3. sri ranganadham appearing for the appellant contended that it is undoubted that the forum of appeal is fixed with reference to the date of institution of .....

Pushkar Nath Nehru and ors. Vs. Administrator (Now by Executive Office ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1987SC1311; JT1987(1)SC799; 1987LabIC982; 1987(1)SCALE603; (1987)2SCC446; 1987(1)LC429(SC)

..... , (hereinafter referred to as the 'petitioner') was entitled to pension under sub-section (3) of section 28 of the jammu & kashmir municipal act, samvat 1998, as amended by the jammu & kashmir municipal (amendment) act, samvat 2008, read with rule 5 of the jammu & kashmir pension rules, 1951.2. the facts leading up to the appeal are as follows ..... but the judgment delivered by the learned single judge was in the exercise of the original civil jurisdiction and therefore appealable under clause 12 of the letters patent. unless the matter relates to criminal jurisdiction, it must be taken that the issuing of writs of certiorari will ordinarily be in the exercise of original ..... sought to be achieved, and it thus offended against article 14 of the constitution. aggrieved, the respondents preferred an appeal under clause 12 of the letters patent. a division bench of the high court by its judgment dated september 29, 1961 allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment of the learned single judge .....

M/S. Aachi Masala Foods (P) Ltd. Vs. S.D. Murali, Trading as the Achi ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... be decided ignoring rule 23. 28. before the present trade marks act, 1999 and patents act, 1970 as amended came into force, the acts that were in existence was the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 and patent act, 1970 (prior to amendment). section 108 of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 dealt with the procedure for application for rectification before a ..... wide as the power of appeal. the power of review will not require detailed investigation into the matter. in kapra mazdoor exta union case, (air 2005 supreme court 1782) the supreme court held that cases where decision is rendered without notice to the opposite party or under mistaken impression that the notice had ..... scrutiny of the law. (xxii) in kapra mazdoor ekta union vs. management of m/s. birla cotton spinning and weaving mills ltd., and others (air 2005 supreme court 1782) the honble supreme court held that where a court or judicial authority having jurisdiction to adjudicate on merits, can review its order on merits .....

Gemini Bay Transcription Pvt Ltd Vs. Integrated Sales Service Limited ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... not based on evidence led by the parties, and therefore, would also have to be characterised as perverse.42. given the fact that the amended act will now apply, and that the patent illegality ground for setting aside arbitral awards in international commercial arbitrations will not apply, it is necessary to advert to the grounds contained in ..... case, no such extraordinary circumstances exist. 53 whilst the decision of batts j may have been reversed by the court of appeals [404 f3 657 (2nd cir, 2005)]., i respectfully agree with his observations which are in line with the general approach taken by an enforcement court to the decision of the arbitral tribunal in question. ..... it was not a signatory, it had by its conduct rendered itself an additional party to the contract containing the arbitration agreement. in sarhank group v oracle corp (2005) 404 f3 657 the issue, on the enforcement of an egyptian award, was whether a non- signatory parent company was bound by an arbitration agreement on the .....

Cadar Constructions Vs. Tara Tiles

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom258; 1984(2)BomCR530; 1984MhLJ603

..... historical knowledge that on 19th of december 1961. this union territory was liberated, conquered in international law. by the government of india. by the constitution (12th amendment) act, passed by the parliament, this union territory was made a part of the republic of india with effect from 20th of december 1961. due to the integration ..... difficulties the president of india issued directions and promulgated regulations from time to time. we may refer to the relevant ones for understanding the points arising in this letters patent appeal. the goa. daman and diu (laws) regulation 1962. hereinafter referred to as regulation no. 12 of 1962. was promulgated by the president of india. ..... present case will be governed by article 14 of schedule to the limitation and applies the suit is barred by time entitled to show even in this letter patent appeal, that the said finding erroneous on the facts of this case is undoubtedly right in this contend with the object of showing that was within time .....

Jai Prakash Agarwal Vs. Prescribed Authority/S.D.M., Sadar, Deoria and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC10; (1999)1UPLBEC697

..... learned single judge passed in writ petitions against orders of board of revenue and director of consolidation were abolished. by u. p. high court (abolition of letters patent appeals) amendment act, 1975. i.e., [u. p. act no- 31 of 1975), special appeal was abolished against orders of learned single judge passed in writ petitions arising out of judgment, order or award of tribunal ..... two judges under rule 5. however, this right of appeal was taken away by 'several amendments in clause 10 of the letters patent. initially, an amendment was made by u. p. high court (abolition of letters patent appeals. 1962 (te., u. p. act no. 14 of 1962). by this amendment, appeals from the order of the learned single judge passed in exercise of appellate jurisdiction or .....

Mylan (Previously Matrix) Laboratories Limited a Company Registered Un ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... in ora/15/2010/pt/del. the facts of the case is that: 2. the original application is for revocation of the patent no. 196774 under the provisions of the patents act, 1970 as amended by the patents (amendment) act, 2005. 3. the applicant herein filed a miscellaneous petition no. 33/2013 for taking on record 12 additional documents. the respondents filed ..... evidence. 12. in this case, the petitioner claims that these documents would show that the duty under section 8 of the patents act was breached by the respondent. after justice ayyangars report, when this act came into force, the law makers have made the failure to disclose the information required by section 8 as a ground for ..... application. 12. the observation made in para 12 of the impugned order as regards section 8 of the act was an error because of the judgement by the hon'ble delhi high court. except for us patent 221 documents, the other eleven documents are irrelevant and are not supported by pleadings. 13. the learned counsel .....

Anilkumar Phoolchand Sanghvi and Another Vs. Chandrakant P. Sanghvi an ...

Court : Mumbai

..... shall not have such original jurisdiction in cases falling within the jurisdiction of the small cause court at bombay, or the bombay city civil court. *amended by the bombay high court letters patents (amendment) act, xli of 1948. pleadings and contents of clause xii leave application and section 9 arbitration petition:- 12. the averments made for leave under clause ..... 12 has been granted. in the circumstances of the present case, therefore, the judgment dated 11-4-2005 passed by the high court of calcutta is correct and does not need any interference. civil appeal no.6691 of 2005 and civil appeal no.4808 of 2013 are hereby dismissed." 46. section 42 deals with an application filed ..... under part-i of the act before the "court" and not the "appeal". both these concepts are different. (m/s. .....

C.W.P. No.8500 of 2011 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .2001 (annexure r-2).which were issued in the light of the amendment of the constitution of india by incorporation of article 16 (4b) by the constitution (eighty firs.amendment) act, 2000, on the basis of which state government decided to amend the instructions, according to which the backlog/carry forward reserved vacancies of ..... based on correct appreciation with regard to applicability and interpretation of the instructions. the said judgement would, therefore, be per-incuriam. merely because the letters patent appeal and the special leave to appeal have been dismissed, would not make it a binding precedent. there is another ground, which dis-entitles the ..... this document civil writ petition no.8500 of2011:{ 7 }: considered and directions issued to fill up the said posts through the general category candidates. letters patent appeal no.1775 of 2012 (haryana vidyut prasaran nigam limited versus garima jindal and another).stands dismissed vide order dated 9.11.2012. special leave to .....