Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 57 amendment of section 107a Court: supreme court of india Page 11 of about 309 results (0.272 seconds)

Food Corporation of India Through Its District Manager, Faridkot, Punj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC1406; JT1992(4)SC1; 1992(1)SCALE928; (1992)3SCC67; [1992]2SCR615

..... acre for the land acquired, vide his award dated on 13.6.86. since the matter was pending in the court of the additional district judge when the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984, came into force, solatium at the rate of 30% was ordered to be paid on the market value of the land. the claimants were also held entitled to ..... the assessment at the rate of rs. 1,20,000 per acre was affirmed but on a different reasoning than the one adopted by the additional district judge. likewise, letters patent appeals by the respective parties to a division bench of the high court were dismissed maintaining the measure of compensation at the rate of rs. 1,20,000 per acre ..... 6.79 about 1 x 1/2 years later than the date of section 4 notification. this sale instance engaged the attention of the additional district judge and the letters patent bench but was dropped from consideration by the learned single judge on the concession of the claimant-land-owners. lastly in point of time is sale instance ex.a-16 .....

R.J. Shah and Co. Vs. H.P. State Electricity Board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2682; 2007(9)SCALE297; (2007)10SCC620

..... state of himachal pradesh. on 1.11.1956 'part-c' states were abolished by the constitution (7th amendment) act. accordingly, the erstwhile part-c state became the state of himachal pradesh. on 1.5.1967 the delhi (high court) act, 1966 came into force. the jurisdiction extended over himachal pradesh by carving out delhi and himachal pradesh from ..... impugned judgment is a full bench decision of delhi high court which decided that if order of the learned single judge is in its ordinary original jurisdiction, no letters patent would lie to the division bench of the high court. (see university of delhi v. hafiz mohd. said : air1972delhi102 ). the division bench in the impugned ..... of judicature at lahore has no application in the state of himachal pradesh and hence no appeal either under clause 9 or clause 10 of the said letters patent would lie to this high court. the appeal against the judgment of a single judge of this court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction will, however, lie .....

Ram Nandan Singh and ors. Vs. A.G. Office Employees Co-op. House Const ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (SCSuppl)2008(1)CHN85; JT2007(12)SC86

..... the learned single judge in the judgment under appeal. he will also make a search to find out whether the concerned amendment of the by-laws of the society had been approved by the registrar and whether any document is available in the ..... members of the society. they have been pursuing their cause before the high court. they were impleaded as parties in the letters patent appeal. not only in the capacity of interveners but also as persons aggrieved, they are, therefore, entitled to file petition for ..... the registrar, cooperative societies again having been raised, the division bench of the high court by an order dated 2.9.2005 directed as under:4. having heard the learned counsels of the respective parties on the said report and after considering the ..... arrive at a decision. an order by a statutory authority, therefore, must be passed in terms of the provisions of the act where for the inquiry report must be looked into. the report of a retired judge of the high court, indisputably will carry .....

Dayaram Vs. Sudhir Batham and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2012)1SCC333

..... letters patent to the high court."(emphasis supplied)in a.r. antulay v. r.s. nayak (1988) 2 scc 602, an earlier bench had transferred the criminal trials pending before the special judge to the high court of bombay. a bench of seven judges while overruling the earlier decision held that section 7(1) of the criminal law amendment act, ..... judge would only be subjected to special leave under article 136 of the constitution.25. the state of madhya pradesh enacted the `uchcha nyayalaya (khandpeeth ko appeal) adhiniyam, 2005" which is deemed to have come into force from 1.7.1981. the said adhiniyam confers a right of appeal before a division bench against the judgment of the ..... by virtue of article 144 it is the duty of all 12authorities, civil and judicial, in the territory of india to act in aid of this court."(emphasis supplied) 10. in kalyan chandra sarkar v. rajesh ranjan (2005) 3 scc 284 this court held that article 142 is an important constitutional power granted to this court to protect the .....

Medical Council of India Vs. The Principal Kmct Medical College

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the enhanced intake of 150. the executive committee of the appellant further decided to invoke clause 8(3)(1)(c) of the establishment of medical college regulation (amendment) act, 2010. the appellant communicated its decision of disapproval to respondent no.2 which was accepted. respondent no.2 directed the college not to admit more than 100 ..... portrayed before its team of assessors. mci has been conferred with statutory powers to protect the cause of medical education. mci is a custodian of public interest and acts in trust for the welfare of society. access to medical care requires the 12 | p a g e presence of qualified health professionals. verification of the ..... the academic session 2018-19. the college was granted liberty to apply afresh for the next academic year in accordance with the provisions of the indian medial council act, 1956 and the regulations framed thereunder. the college challenged the said decision of 7. respondent no.2 in the high court of kerala and sought for .....

Assistant General Manager State Bank of India Vs. Radhey Shyam Pandey

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... rule, whereas other banks did it later on with retrospective effect. they cannot invalidate otherwise valid decision by virtue of exclusive superior power to amend or not to amend the rule and act unfairly and make the entire contract unreasonable based on misrepresentation. it was open to the board of directors to reject the proposal. once it accepted the proposal to ..... resolution. the pension was the essence of the scheme, depriving it could not be said to be authorised, such action can only be termed as unfair and unreasonable and patently violative of articles 14, 16, and 21 of the constitution of india. 45 48. yet another aspect which cannot be lost sight is that the bank mentioned in the ..... this, 1/5th are in the age group of 56 and above. to put it simply, 21,824 employees will reach the age of superannuation and retire by march 2005. in the light of the above mentioned factors, it will be seen that the manpower of the bank will undergo major changes in the ensuing years in number and .....

Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association Vs. Nbcc (i ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... above objectives. 234 (emphasis in bold supplied) 118.1. the aforesaid bill ultimately took the shape of the insolvency and bankruptcy code (amendment) act, 2019, being act 26 of 2019. this amendment act of 2019 not only provided that operational creditors would receive an amount that is not less than liquidation value of their debts or the amount ..... taken in the appeal filed against the impugned order and was raised for the first time in written submissions. nevertheless, according to yeida, the argument is patently incorrect, for it ignores the fact that the corporate debtor jil and its successor spvs would derive the benefits of both, the toll collected from expressway ..... welfare society v. jaiprakash associates ltd.; 40.5. the contention of jal that they faced impediments on account of the purported stay imposed by ngt is patently incorrect 49 as the stay by ngt was only on handing over possession without an occupation certificate, which had no bearing on the construction. moreover, jal .....

Pravin Electricals Pvt. Ltd Vs. Galaxy Infra And Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... is final and insert the words the high court, and no appeal, including letters patent appeal, shall lie against such order. [note: this amendment ensures that a) an affirmative judicial finding regarding the existence of the arbitration agreement; and (b) the administrative act of appointing the arbitrator are final and non- appealabe.]. section 37, which is the ..... the memorandum of understanding in the said case did not incorporate an arbitration clause. thereafter, reference was specifically made to sbp & co. v. patel engg. ltd., (2005) 8 scc618and national insurance co. ltd. v. boghara polyfab (p) ltd., (2009) 1 scc267to observe that the legislative policy is essential to minimise court's interference ..... be found in the decision of the supreme court in shin- 20 etsu chemical co. ltd. v. aksh optifibre ltd., (2005) 7 scc234 (in the context of section 45 of the act), where the supreme court has ruled in favour of looking at the issues/controversy only prima facie.33. it is in this context .....

Union of India Vs. M/S. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... exercised the discretion or otherwise, could be assailed by the respondent before this court by way of special leave petition. but, certainly not by way of a letters patent appeal under clause 15. for, even if the learned single judge may have committed manifest error or wrongly decided the application for condonation of delay, that judgment is ..... co.3 would be clear from the following para 10 of the judgment: (p.s. sathappan case16, scc pp. 689-90) 10. the provisions in the letters patent providing for appeal, insofar as they related to orders passed in arbitration proceedings, were held to be subject to the provisions of sections 39(1) and (2) of ..... (in p.s. sathappan) was held to be a self- contained code. now, if the arbitration act, 1940 was held to be a self- contained code, on matters pertaining to arbitration, the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, which consolidates, amends and designs the law relating to arbitration bring it, as much as possible, in harmony with the uncitral .....

Ratan Lal Adukia and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC104a; (1990)1CALLT25(SC); [1989]3SCR440; 1989(2)LC382(SC)

..... . reliance was also placed on section 21-a inserted by section 4 of the presidency small cause courts (west bengal amendment) act, 1980 which provides:21a. act to override other laws including letters patent : the provisions of this act shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other law, including in particular the letters ..... may be, or against the railway administration on whose railway the loss, injury, destruction or deterioration occurred.the new section 80 substituted in 1961 by the amending act provides:80. suits for compensation: a suit for compensation for loss of the life of, or personal injury to, a passenger or for loss, destruction, ..... are apprehended in their proper perspective, it becomes necessary to refer to and notice the legislative history of the provision. section 14 of the indian railways (amendment) act, 1961, substituted the old section 80 by a new provision. the old section reads:section 80 : suit for compensation for injury to through booked .....