Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 57 amendment of section 107a Court: karnataka Year: 2007

K. Sathya Murthy Vs. the Secretary Ministry for Industry and Commerce ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ686; 2007(4)KCCRSN260; 2007(3)AIRKarR40.

..... at the chennai office.2. the affidavit, inter alia; discloses the significant changes that have been brought about in the patents act, 1970 by the amending act of 2005; that the present procedure for processing the applications is now streamlined comparable to similar processing procedures undertaken elsewhere in other developed ..... places on record an affidavit dated 19-4-2005, sworn to by sri mannargudy sundararaman venkataraman, assistant controller of patents and designs, patent office, chennai2. the affidavit inter alia, points out that sweeping changes have been brought about by the amendment act of 2005 to the parent patent act of 1970 and some major changes such as ..... omission of section 5 of the principal act, having taken place and changed statutory position substantially alters the grounds on which the persons .....

Manipal Academy of Higher Education Rep. by Its Registrar, Sudhakar Na ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR257; (2008)13VST377(Karn); 2008(1)KCCR451; 2008(2)AIRKarR8; 2008LabIC1763

..... sarangan appearing for the appellant submits that section 103(b) of the act, by way of amendment act no. 31/2001 with effect from 19.11.2001 to the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976, provides for levy of infrastructure and solid waste management, notwithstanding ..... the trades people are having the use of certain facilities for the hotter conduct of their business and paying not patently much more than what is required for providing the facilities. it would he impossible to judge the compensatory nature of ..... 2003-04 540.76 673.46 0.00 628.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------2004-05 768.47 791.72 0.00 798.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------2005-06 948.02 - - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------2005-06(re) 1000.73 - 0.00 1160.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------2006-07(be) 1155.37 - 0.00 2749.07 .....

The Secretary, S.J.M. Vidyapeeta, Vs. the Principal, Secretary to Gove ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(6)KarLJ448; 2007(5)AIRKarR207.

..... orders passed on such applications in pending proceedings are not interfered with by this court, unless while doing so the authority passes order without jurisdiction or acts in a patently illegal manner. under the present order, what is noticed is that by allowing the applications in the pending revision petition, the revision petition would be ..... pending and were ripe for hearing and arguments and at that stage it appears the revision petitioners before the government filed two interlocutory applications, one for amendment of the prayer and production of additional documents and another one for treating the pending matters as appeals and the revision in respect of the subsequent action ..... is actually one under section 131 of the act and not an appeal under section 130 of the act, as no specific order is challenged.12. when such is the situation, on the application filed in the year 2005 in the pending revision petition, the revision petition cannot be converted as an appeal against the .....

Mrs. Mallika and ors. Vs. Mr. Chandrappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3216; 2008(1)KarLJ482; 2007(2)KCCR1349; 2007(5)AIRKarR283; AIR2007NOC2236

..... ) which held that the settled principle of hindu law that the son would inherit the property of his father as kartha of his own family is amended by section 8 of the succession act and such property devolving on the son has to be regarded as the son's individual property and therefore son's sons will have no right in ..... be characterised as vitiated by 'error apparent'. a review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected, but lies only for patent error. where without any elaborate argument one could point to the error and say here is a substantial point of law which stares one in the face, and there could ..... s on hindu law, 12'' edition, pages 918-919.22. the express words of section 8 of the hindu succession act, 1956 cannot be ignored and must prevail. the preamble to the act reiterates that the act is, inter alia, to 'amend' the law, with that background the express language which excludes son's son but included son of a predeceased son cannot .....

Dundappa Mahadevappa and Smt. Shamala W/O Dundappa Mahadevappa Vs. Nag ...

Court : Karnataka

..... personal law have right to inherit the estate of their parents. the discriminatory treatment meted to illegitimate children under the w.c. act is patently discriminatory and does not stand test of article 14. the anomaly needs expeditious legislative action to amend the definition.4. in the instant case, the father of the deceased is one of the claimants. it is in evidence ..... . 2135/- per month on the basis of minimum wages which is perversely contrary to the evidence on record?2. the provisions of section 2(d) of the workmen's compensation act are extracted hereunder for convenient reference.(d) 'dependent' means any of the following relatives of a deceased workman, namely:(i) a widow, a minor (legitimate or adopted) son, an unmarried ..... registry is directed to send the copy of this order to the principal secretary, law and parliamentary affairs to bring to the notice of the concerned authorities to effect necessary amendment to section 2 of the w.c .....

Veerayya S/O Veerabhadrayya Saraganachari Vs. the Asst Commissioner Ba ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR1140

..... continued to be in actual possession and cultivation of such land on the date of commencement of the karnataka land reforms [amendment], act, 1997.he may [within one year from the date of commencement of the karnataka land reforms [amendment] act, 1997] grant the land to such person subject to such restrictions and conditions and in the manner, as may be ..... in respect of the subject land. if the petitioner was not a tenant, there is no question of the petitioner maintaining the application under section 77a of the act.17. though learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that if the land had vested in the state government and there being no contrary finding, nothing comes in ..... [for short the act'] before the assistant commissioner and was successful in that effort in respect of 5 acres of land in sy. no. 111/2 of sulibhavi village, hungund taluk, but was deprived of this benefit by the karnataka appellate tribunal in terms of its order dated 7-3-2005 passed in appeal no. 683/2002 at .....