Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... , mahadwar road, belgaum, presently r/at plot no.33, mahabaleshwar nagar, near hindalga ganapathi temple, belagavi-591108. since appellant no.16 has died cause title is amended vide court. order dated 03.07.2023. 16(a) padma, w/o. narayan potdar age:62 years, occ:household work, r/o. plot no.33, mahabaleshwar ..... limit of belagavi city, the plaintiff was found to have possessed excess land. according to section 6 of the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976, ( the act for short) the plaintiff was required to file a declaration under the said provision. the plaintiff, therefore, made an application to the government of ..... ramachandra d. huddar regular first appeal no.719 of2015between:1. abhiman apartment co-operative housing society limited, a society registered under the karnataka co-operative society act having its registered office at dr. ambedkar road, opposite civil hospital belagavi (since liquidated as per karnataka state government gazette, notification no.drl:n:lqd143200 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... for respondent no.3 relied upon a ruling of this court reported in ilr2005kar4852between smt. gangamma and another vs. tahsildar and others wherein this court has observed that amendment of the order of the land tribunal whether permissible - survey report given application filed to the land tribunal to suitably modify its previous order - land tribunal rejecting ..... the said request on the ground that it does not have statutory power to amend the order. 17 15. it is clear from second proviso to sub section (6) to section 48a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 that the land tribunal may on its own or on the application of any of the ..... v.bhujanga shetty vs. the state of karnataka rep. by revenue secretary and others, wherein this court has held that - sec.48-a of kar. land reforms act: enquiry under petitioner, subsequent purchaser of several items of the properties from the original owner, after the appointed day - the impugned order does not disclose the name of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... the accused persons sharing the common intention must be physically present at the scene of occurrence and be shown not to have dissuaded themselves from the intended criminal act for which they shared the common intention. culpability under section 34 cannot be excluded by mere distance from the scene of occurrence. the presumption of 43 constructive ..... lj689 . referring to section 34 prior to its amendment in 1870 wherein it was provided 44 when a criminal act is done by several persons, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if the act was done by him alone it was noticed that by amendment, the words in furtherance of common intention of ..... all were inserted after the word persons and before the word each so as to make the object of the section clear. dealing with the scope of the section, as it exists today, it was held: section 34 lays down a principle of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... quashing the proceeding/meeting dated2905.2019 held by the respondent no.3 under the scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 and allied rules2008and amended rules2012in so far reviewing/reconsidering the petitioner claim/case and thereby directing the respondent no.4 sub-divisional committed reconsider bearing no.f p /vgai ..... of sub- section (o) of section 2, means any member or community who has for at least three generations prior to the 13th day of december, 2005, primarily residing in and who depend on the forest or forests land for bona fide livelihood needs and as per explanation generation means a period comprising of ..... as under: (o) other traditional forest dweller means any member or community who has for at least three generations prior to the 13th day of december, 2005 primarily resided in and who depend on the forest or forests land for bona fide livelihood needs 23. forest rights are recognised under section 3 in terms of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... the phones to any person of their choice to examine or extract data from the phones in question. following the introduction of section 79-a, the indian evidence act, 1872 has also been amended and section 45a has been inserted making the opinion of the examiner of electronic evidence' a relevant fact. section 79-a of - 57 - crl.a no.2760 ..... ) that the appellant craves to refer to and rely upon charge sheet and other exhibited documents in support of his case. (cid:1) that the appellant craves leave to add, amend, delete, change, alter, modify any of the - 23 - crl.a no.2760 of 2012 foregoing paras / grounds with the permission of this hon'ble court.13. reiterating the grounds ..... chat transcripts (which, again, can be saved as image files)69. similarly, in the case of williams v. sprint/united mgmt. co., 230 f.r.d. 640 (d. kan. 2005), the court observed that:"when an electronic file is sent with a hash mark, others can read it, but the file cannot be altered without a change also occurring in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... the application was rejected by the single bench. an appeal having been filed before the division bench, the division bench allowed the said application. hence, an amendment was carried out, bringing on record respondents nos. 6 to 15, who also filed their statement of objections and addressed their arguments opposing the petition.9. ..... such document is kept substantially in the form required by law and is produced from proper custody. 26.7. a perusal of section 81 of indian evidence act, extracted hereinabove, would indicate that the court shall presume the genuineness of every document, be it official gazette or government gazette printed by the queens printer, which ..... -v- smt.chanderjoti debi and others6 air1996patna 110, particularly para 31 thereof, which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:31. section 21 of the evidence act states that admissions are relevant and may be proved as against the persons who makes them, or his representative in interest; but they cannot be proved by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... the application was rejected by the single bench. an appeal having been filed before the division bench, the division bench allowed the said application. hence, an amendment was carried out, bringing on record respondents nos. 6 to 15, who also filed their statement of objections and addressed their arguments opposing the petition.9. ..... such document is kept substantially in the form required by law and is produced from proper custody. 26.7. a perusal of section 81 of indian evidence act, extracted hereinabove, would indicate that the court shall presume the genuineness of every document, be it official gazette or government gazette printed by the queens printer, which ..... -v- smt.chanderjoti debi and others6 air1996patna 110, particularly para 31 thereof, which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:31. section 21 of the evidence act states that admissions are relevant and may be proved as against the persons who makes them, or his representative in interest; but they cannot be proved by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... same shall have a bearing on section 32.21. in the present case, the period of limitation as per the amendment act no.54/2013 is eight years with effect from 01.04.2005 i.e., 30.04.2013, the date of finality of the assessment, which would be the date of expiry of limitation to reassess the deemed assessments made ..... 31.03.2007 shall be made within a period of ten years, after the end of the prescribed tax period. by karnataka act no.54/2013, this section is further amended retrospectively with effect from the first day of april, 2005, and the same reads thus:. (1) an assessment under section 38 or reassessment under section 39 of an amount of ..... the faa holding that re-assessment made was barred by limitation, allowed the appeals. in view of amendment brought to section 40 (1) of the kvat act by act no.54/2013 with effect from 01.04.2005 and the constitutional validity of the said amendment being upheld by this court in the case of ciftech solutions supra, the order of the appellate court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... n 7 government with a view to achieve the object, amended the provisions of section 8 of the national highways act, 1956 [ act of 1956 for short]. vide amendment act 26 of 1995 and inserted the provisions of section 8a into the national highways act, 1956. [ nh act for short].. pursuant to the amendment, the central government came to be vested with the statutory ..... as may be prescribed;]. (k) collect fees on behalf of the central government for services or benefits rendered under section 7 of the national highways act, 1956 (48 of 1956), as amended from time to time, and such other fees on behalf of the state governments on such terms and conditions as may be specified by such state ..... vehicles may stop, way-side amenities, etc. that this absolute power is granted by the statute and cannot be abrogated except by an amendment to the statute, that is to section 8a of nh act of 1956.10. it is contended that it is no doubt true that in such bot project, the land belongs to the government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... of any land nor shall any land be leased for any period whatsoever. section 5 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 reads thus: 5. prohibition of leases, etc: (1) save as provided in this act, after the date of commencement of the amendment act, no tenancy shall be :20. : created or continued in respect of any land nor shall any land be ..... alleged to have purchased the property to an extent of 4 acres 37 guntas in sy.no.159 from parvatavva patil and respondent no.3/virupaxappa. thereafter on 14.02.2005, as per annexure e2 , the tahasildar divided sy.no.159 into three blocks, 159/1, 159/2 and 159/3. the subject matter of the present writ petition is ..... and r5; r4-service held sufficient) :3. : this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india, praying to quash impugned orders annexure- l i.e. rts/ap/42/2005-06 dated:19/09/2006 and q i.e. rts.ra.cr.33/2006-07 dated:14/07/2009, passed by the assistant commissioner, dharwad, respectively as illegal, invalid and .....
Tag this Judgment!