Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 14 substitution of new sections for sections 14 and 15 Court: karnataka Page 11 of about 1,082 results (1.119 seconds)

M/S. Bella Premier Happy Hygiene Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... order reversing the said advance ruling and issuing the so called clarification which is not correct in law. he has also urged that such power given under amended provisions of section 60(8) of the act are also date of order :23. 10.2017 wp no.49577/2014 m/s bella premier happy hygiene care private limited vs, state of karnataka & another ..... provisions of section 60(8). the rate of tax applicable in respect f all other dealers is as under for different periods: sl.no.period tax rate 1. 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2010 12.5% 2. 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2011 13.5% 3. 01.04.2011 to 31.07.2012 14% 4. 01.08.2012 and ..... bella premier happy hygiene care private limited vs, state of karnataka & another. . 5/26 residuary entry taxable from 12.5% to 14.5% for the periods commencing from 01.04.2005 till the date of passing of the order.4. the learned counsel for petitioner, mr.shivadass g., also submitted that the state government later on has issued a notification on .....

Dr Leena S Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... vested interest of selection of candidates in whom he was interested. this subversion commenced from the stage of the amendment of the rules and continued till the stage of interview, where the selection committee without any prior intimation and ..... 3) the governing council shall also have the power to add, alter or amend the rules and regulations and bye-laws of the society consistent with the societies registration act and subject to approval of the government of karnataka. 31 he would contend ..... dt.6.6.2005. out of the 08 vacancies notified, 03 were earmarked for gm, 01 for 371(j). 01 for ii ..... act and in view of the above provision, the age limit of the third respondent could be relaxed upto 10 years.9. that the vacancies have been clubbed together and classified according to the policy of reservation as prescribed for direct recruitment in go no.dpar:8:sbc:1995 20.6.1995 read with go no.dpar:18:sbc:2005 .....

M/S Lands + Gyr Limited Vs. the General Manager (Ele), Bangalore Elect ...

Court : Karnataka

..... same type of meters tendered. such certification shall not be older than two years from the date of bid opening. (vi) two samples (later on amended to three samples) meters for each type conforming to the specification duty sealed along with the type test certificates shall be furnished with the bid failing which ..... the proceedings while accepting the proposal of the tender scrutiny committee. she was an appellate authority under section 16 of the karnataka transparency in public procurement act, 1999 and the appeal challenging the award of tender by the board was filed before the 4th respondent. therefore, there is a reasonable ground for ..... been proceed or evaluated in accordance with the tender conditions or in due conformity with the provisions of the karnataka transparency in public procurements act, 1999 (for short ktpp act). the board cannot arbitrarily and by expost-facto subjective interpretation of the tender conditions resort to quixotic, whimsical and unfair method of continuing .....

Sri.n.p.amrutesh Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... which relate to high courts. he would further contend that certain words in entry-3, list-ii of seventh schedule were omitted by the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976 with effect from 03/01/1977. entry 11a of list iii of seventh schedule relates to "administration of justice; constitution and organisation of all courts, ..... reference to the question of legislative competence, subject to the same being not in conflict with any specific provision of the constitution. clause 31 of the letters patent has not been shown to be in conflict with any provision of the constitution. on the other hand, the said provision is consistent with the scheme of ..... -n, which relate to establishment of circuit benches at dharwad and gulbarga and later converting them to permanent benches in 2013, is patently contrary to law as the karnataka high court act, 1961 does not contemplate the creation and establishment of circuit benches or permanent benches by invoking the provisions of sections 51(3) and .....

Baba Associates Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR28

..... its own order which is apparent from the record. this is merely a power of amending its order. the power of rectification under section 254(2) can be exercised only when the mistake which is sought to be rectified is an obvious and patent mistake which is apparent from the record, and not a mistake which requires to be ..... s. baba associates, has challenged the order dated november 30, 1990, passed by the karnataka appellate tribunal, bangalore, under section 22(6-a) of the karnataka sales tax act, 1957 ('the act' for short). by the said order, the tribunal has rectified its earlier decision rendered on october 4, 1985, in s.t.a. no. 1340 of 1983. the ..... legal position, therefore, it cannot be said that rectification application moved by the revenue, on the grounds raised, was not maintainable under section 22(6-a) of the act. the second point is therefore answered against the petitioner. point no. 3. 21. now is the stage for consideration of the merits of the impugned order in rectification .....

Town House Building Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Special Deputy Commi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1988Kant312; ILR1988KAR579; 1988(2)KarLJ510

..... writ petitions were required to be heard and decided by a bench consisting of two judges. by the amending act of 1973, sections 9 and 10 of the act were amended. according to amended s. 9, all petitions under art. 226' except a petition seeking the. issue of a writ of habeas corpus, are required to be heard ..... in balakrishnadas v. pottery co. ltd., : air1985mp42 in the context of a challenge to the validity of law enacted by the state legislature, abolishing the letters patent jurisdiction inherited by the madhya pradesh high court; held that a matter like conferment of general appellate jurisdiction on the high court against the decision reordered by the ..... and consequently falls within the exclusive legislative powers of the parliament. on this view of the matter, the full bench held that the law abolishing letters patent jurisdiction which vested in the high court as part of its constitution was beyond the conference of the madhya pradesh legislature an appeal against the said judgment .....

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Vittal Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....

Sri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points ..... person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the ..... (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 .....