Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned purpose. only by the amendment act 62 of 2002, this section was amended and following line was added at the end which came into force w.e.f.,13.3.2003 i.e. but does not include use by ..... was held by the national commission that the complainant was consumer in view of the fact that the complaint was filed prior to the date of enforcement of amendment act 62 of 2003. in the light of the discussion and in view of the ratio laid in kalpavruksha charitable trust v. toshniwal bros. and cheema engineering services v ..... actual cost of the machine was rs.28 lakhs. the opposite parties sold the machine to the complainant for a consideration of rs.37 lakhs. the opposite parties acted fraudulently and dishonestly and induced the complainant to purchase the machine at an exorbitant rate. the opposite parties are responsible for the loss sustained by the complainant. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... orders were then marked to be implemented by treating as if they were decrees of the civil court. however, the subsequent amendment of section 25 as also section 27 in the year 2002 by way of act 62 of 2002 which came into force with effect from 15-3-2003, the whole procedure of execution of the orders passed by the district ..... and the collector shall proceed to recover the amount in the same manner as arrears of land revenue) from a comparative study of sec.25 before and after amendment of the year, 2002, under the new provisions the procedure of attachment and sale is applicable for enforcement of only interim order; but not final order in the consumer complaint for which ..... interest of judicial discipline which requires that as far as practicable, the orders of a court must be honoured in order to avert controversy even when there is a patent suspicion as to its legality amd the same is reversed by due process of law. it is rather unfortunate that the other side did not take steps to see .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... in terms of the assessment notice. opposite party finally submitted that the present case being a case of pilferage, the special court constituted under the amendment act of indian electricity act only was having jurisdiction and this matter should go before that court and therefore impliedly suggested that this commission had no jurisdiction. in support of ..... a large extent by the said act itself supplemented by indian electricity, (a.p.amendment) act, 2000 and other regulations made thereunder. so far as this case is concerned, the cause of action clearly arose in july, 2002, as such we need not go into the impact of indian electricity act, 2003, rather we have to ..... necessarily stop before the era of indian electricity act, 2003. likewise, we .....
Tag this Judgment!