Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2002 section 32 amendment of section 67 Sorted by: old Court: uttaranchal Page 2 of about 27 results (0.113 seconds)

Aug 21 2006 (HC)

Rajendra Prasad Nautiyal and Etc. Vs. Krishna Kumar Bangwal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2007Utr1

..... united nations. it is notable that mathew, j. observed in indira gandhi air 1975 sc 2299 (p. 513, see p. 128, para 303) (at p. 2378 of air):if the amending body really exercised judicial power, that power was exercised in violation of the principles of natural justice of audi alteram partem. even if a power is given to a body ..... appears to be done. they have a duty to proceed in a way, which is free from even the appearance of arbitrariness, unreasonableness or unfairness. they have to act in a manner which is patently impartial and meets the requirements of natural justice.'12. in the case smt. maneka gandhi v. union of india manu/sc/0133/1978 : [1978]2scr621 , the apex ..... . the judgment in the case of menaka gandhi (supra) has been followed in the case of west bengal electricity regulatory commission v. c.e.s.c. ltd. manu/sc/0859/2002 : air2002sc3588 , relying upon the case of mrs. maneka gandhi v. union of india manu/sc/0133/1978 : [1978]2scr621 as under para 100a of air:the right of audi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2007 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Prem Bisht and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2008ACJ1057

..... the cost of living in spite of the lapse of a period of more than 10 years, the second schedule has not been amended by the central government. we, therefore, deem it proper to take into consideration the erosion in the purchase value of the rupee ..... the rule of main purpose' and the concept of 'fundamental breach' to allow defences available to the insurer under section 149(2) of the act.13. the apex court in the case of lai chand v. oriental insurance co. ltd. manu/sc/8433/2006 : (2006)7scc318 , ..... of the death of govind singh in a motor vehicle accident. according to the claimant on the fateful day on 2.3.2002 at about 7.30 p.m., the deceased was travelling by jeep no. up 01-3159. the vehicle was being driven ..... have submitted that aforesaid endorsement is only applicable for public service vehicles and further there being no such provision under the motor vehicles act, therefore, rule 193 cannot be held to be applicable.i have considered the submissions in the light of the above rules and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2007 (HC)

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. R.B. NaraIn Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2007Utr87

..... , 'to improve relations between landlords and tenants in oudh and specially to give the latter greater security of tenure at a fair rental that the oudh rent (amendment) act 4 of 1921 was enacted.this act had repercussions in the province of agra. there the kisan movement gained momentum in the shape of eka, and in the words of sir william marris, drove ..... of 1932 providing remissions in arrears for 1337 and 1338 faslis up to 25 p.c, and allowing payment of decreed amount by installments: by the amending act 9 of 1934 in addition to several executive measures, such as, flat rate remission scheme etc.in september 1939, the great war began. it was a fight for democracy and ..... site and similar controversies are involved in these cases, hence both the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. f.a. no. 15/2002, arise out of the judgment and decree dated 13-12-2001, passed by civil judge (senior division), haridwar in o.s. no. 4 of 1992, r.b. narain singh v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2007 (HC)

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Vidyut Carbon Products Pvt. ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2008)IIILLJ663UC

..... or obstructions on the part of the defaulting employers. to remove the lacuna and to provide for a speedy procedure and remedy section 45-a was introduced by amending act no. 44 of 1966. it also lays down the purpose behind it. it also provides the guidelines as to the class of cases in which procedure prescribed ..... corporation may on the basis of the information available to it determine the amount of contributions payable and make necessary demands. apparently the scheme of the act after the amendment is, that the corporation itself should in a case where there is omission on the part of the employer to maintain records in accordance with section ..... sudhir kumar, counsel for the respondent.2. by the present a.o. filed under section 82 of the employees' state insurance act, 1948, appellant has prayed for setting aside the order dated february 5, 2002 passed by the employees state insurance court, haridwar in o.s. no. 142/1996 vidyut carbon products private ltd. through managing director .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2008 (HC)

State Bank of India Vs. Kundan Singh

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2008Utr53

..... writ of certiorari. if it is reasonably possible to form two opinions on the same material, the finding arrived at one way or the other, cannot be called a patent error. as to the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of the high court under article 227 of the constitution also, it has been held in suiya dev rai that the jurisdiction ..... a sum of rs. 6,62,000/- is due against the petitioner-bank towards the rent enhanced under section 21(8) of the act, on which the collector udham singh nagar has passed order dated 2-12-2002 to recover the said amount as arrears of land revenue. relevant facts of the case shall be narrated at appropriate place in this ..... was taken on record vide order dated 23-10-2002. in this affidavit, the petitioners have taken entirely a different case. to my mind, the supplementary affidavit cannot be a substitute to the memo of writ petition, unless prayer for necessary amendments in the memo of writ petition is sought for and granted by the court.15. it has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2008 (HC)

Eveready Industries India Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2008)17VST18(NULL)

..... notification dated february 21, 1997.5. after creation of new state of uttaranchal (now uttarakhand), the state government has adopted the act and the word 'uttaranchal' has been substituted in place of uttar pradesh therein. according to the petitioner, no amendment has been made in the notification dated february 21, 1997.6. the grievance of the petitioner is that after enforcement of ..... .21. according to the petitioner, the petitioner is a public limited company incorporated in the indian companies act registered under the uttaranchal (u.p. trade tax act, 1948) as adopted by uttaranchal adaptation and modification order, 2002. the petitioner is also registered under the central sales tax act with the deputy commissioner (assessment-6), commercial taxes, dehradun. the petitioner has its factory in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2009 (HC)

Smt. Pooja Rajput Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2010Utr24

..... being quoted hereunder:sub-clause (iii-a) of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 95 of u.p. panchayat raj act (as inserted by amending act no. xxi of 1998).95 (1) the state government may:(a) to (f)....(g) remove a pradhan, up-pradhan or member of a gram panchayat or a joint committee ..... . article 243-o(b) of the constitution of india is a mandatory and totally binding provision and any provision made by state legislature in contravention of the aforesaid provisions is patently illegal too. in fact, this article of the constitution has prohibited the state legislature from enacting any law for settling the election disputes of elected 'gram pradhan' except by ..... arguments shri arvind vashishtha cited the judgments reported in manu/sc/8718/2006 : air 2007 sc 903, state of himachal pradesh v. surinder singh banolta manu/up/0359/2002 : 2002 (3) awc 1761 : air 2002 all 257 hoti lal v. state of u.p.6. on the other hand shri s. k. mandal, learned counsel for, respondent no. 5 argued that at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2010 (HC)

Prashant Jaiswal and ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... the state of delhi [now delhi administration] : air 1960 sc 89 [v 47 c 15] has held that the purpose of repealing and amending act is to strike out the unnecessary acts and excise dead matters from the statute book in order to lighten the burden of ever increasing spate of legislation and to remove confusion from the ..... as section 68 is concerned, (3)(ca) was added to section 68 by section 22 of the motor vehicles (amendment act), 1994. section 22 of amendment act, 1994 reads as follows:22. amendment of section 68. - in section 68 of the principal act, in sub-section (3), after clause (c), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:(ca) government to ..... these writ petitions is that section 68(3)(ca) which was inserted in the motor vehicles act, 1988 by way of an amendment, known as motor vehicle (amendment) act, 1994 (act no. 54 of 1994), stood repealed in the year 2001 by the repealing and amending act, 2001 (act no. 30 of 2001). hence, since these provisions i.e. clause (ca) to section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2010 (HC)

Upendra Singh Maniyari Vs. Jagmohan Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... appeal arising from an application or proceeding, instituted or commenced whether prior or subsequent to the commencement of the uttar pradesh high court (abolition of letters patent appeals) (amendment) act, 1981, shall lie to the high court from a judgment or order of one judge of the high court, made in the exercise of jurisdiction ..... before the high court immediately before the commencement of the uttar pradesh high court (abolition of letters patent appeals) (amendment) act, 1981, shall be heard and disposed of as if that subsection had not been enacted.the aforesaid amendment necessitated a further amendment of rule 5, contained in section c, of chapter viii, of the 'rules of the ..... 1972 and 1975) deserves a reference. in the statement of objects and reasons recorded in the u.p. high court (abolition of letters patent appeals) (amendment) act, 1981, it was inter alia noticed, that despite various measures taken earlier, the number of pending cases in the high court at allahabad .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2010 (HC)

Telecommunication Consultants India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercia ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2010)29VST265(NULL)

..... of the principles providing situs of sale was engrafted in the explanation to clause (1)(a) of article 286, as it existed prior to the constitution (sixth amendment) act, which provided that the situs of sale would be where the goods are delivered for consumption. the second view is, situs of sale would be the place where ..... as well as the appellate order dated 21.09.2005, the revision petitioner filed a further appeal under section 10(2) of the trade tax act, 1948, read with the adoption and modification order, 2002, before the commercial tax tribunal, uttarakhand, dehradun (hereinafter referred to as the 'tribunal'). the tribunal, vide its order dated 29.12.2008 ..... . tcil, received rent in respect of the concerned equipments. since the period during which the aforesaid rent was received, relevant to the present controversy, is from 1997 to 2002 only, the aforesaid details are being furnished. for the period from 1997-1998, tcil received total rent of rs. 40,11,912/- (from the ongc). for 1998 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //