Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2002 section 32 amendment of section 67 Court: jharkhand Page 13 of about 139 results (0.344 seconds)

Rajesh Kumar and Anr Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... 100 subject to fulfillment of the following conditions :- (i) the institution shall comply with the various other norms and standards prescribed in the ncte regulations, as amended from time to time. (ii) the institution shall make admission only after it obtains affiliation from the examining body in terms of clause 8(12) of the ..... in the entrance examinations or other processes for the purposes of subject and college preference.83. undoubtedly, adherence to the schedule achieves the object of the act and its various aspects. disobedience results in unfair admissions, not commencing the courses within the stipulated time and causing serious prejudice to the students of higher ..... offending the provisions of the act and conditions of recognition, then the opinion of the state government at the second stage is a mere formality unless there was a drastic and unacceptable mistake or the entire process was vitiated by fraud or there was patently eminent danger to the life of the students working .....

Tata Steel Limited and Others Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Others

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2012AIR(Jhar)83

..... of goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein act, 1993, as adopted by the state of jharkhand vide notification dated 15th december, 2000 and as amended vide the jharkhand entry tax act on consumption, use or sale thereof (amendment) ordinance, 2001, (jharkhand ordinance2 of 2002) do not satisfy the requirement under article 301 read with article ..... stainless ltd. (2) and ano. has declared that whenever such law is impugned as violative of article 301 of the constitution of india and facially and patently does not indicate quantifiable data on the basis of which compensatory tax is sought to be levied, then burden lies on the state to show by placing ..... trade, commerce and intercourse under article 301. 21. admittedly the state has to pass the test of discharge its burden whether the impugned enactment facially or patently indicates quantifiable data on the basis of which compensatory tax is sought to be levied. hon'ble supreme court in the case of jindal stainless ltd. ( .....

R L Das Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... 35 to 40 years. this aspect of the matter has been properly appreciated by the learned single judge while dismissing the writ petition being w.p. (s) no.4715 of 2002. we, see no reason to take any other view than what is taken by the learned single judge while passing the order dated 02.08.2012 in w.p.(s ..... days delay, it has wrongly been mentioned as 157 days.2. necessary amendment is permitted to be carried out in red ink, in course of day.3. this interlocutory application has been preferred under section 5 of the limitation act for condonation of delay of 557 days in preferring this letters patent appeal.4. having heard learned counsel for both the sides, and ..... . 2242 of 2014 stands allowed and -2- disposed of. l.p.a. no.124 of 2014 6. this letters patent appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner no.1, who had preferred writ petition being w.p.(s) no.4715 of 2002, which was dismissed by the learned single judge vide order dated 02.08.2012 and it has been held .....

Jugnu Construction and Ors. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd.

Court : Jharkhand

..... ext.6/d) an order was passed in c.w.j.c. no.1232 of 1988 in which the defendants filed an amendment petition in original writ petition with a prayer for direction upon c.c.l to allow the petitioner to carry the ash from ..... bermo,p.o.phsro,district- bokaro. ..... appellants. versus central coalfields limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of companies act, 1956 being one of the subsidiary companies of coal india limited, having its registered office at darbhanga house, ranchi and its place of business ..... as plaintiff and defendants.3. the case of the plaintiff is that it is a government company under section 617 of the companies act, 1956 having its registered office at darbhanga house, ranchi and having business at 2 swang washery, p.o.swang, district-bokaro ..... plaintiff to the defendants. ext.6 is the carbon copy of order dated 10.12.2002 of the high court of jharkhand, ranchi passed in m.a. no.105/2002 in between the parties. ext.6/a is the carbon copy of order dated 25 .....

Tata Yodogawa Limited Through Its Company Secretary Sri Prashant Kumar ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... .051 on account of energy dues and other allied dues. on initiation of the certificate proceeding and after issuance of notice under section 7 of the act, the petitioner has filed the instant application seeking amendment in order to challenge the letter no. 07 dated 19.02.2015 issued by the certificate officer (electrical & revenue) i.d. karandih, jamshedpur, saraikella, kharsawan. ..... as in terms of letter dated 7.5.2001, the validity of the said tariff was only up till 31.03.2002, whereas in the amendment, which has been sought to be made by the petitioner, the applicability of 1999 induction furnace tariff was from 6.4.2000 till 6th may, 2001 as in terms ..... in 1995 (1) pljr86 the tata iron & steel company ltd. vs. the state of bihar & ors., reported in 1995 (2) pljr459and anwar ali vs. state of bihar & ors., reported in 2002 (4) pljr255 replying to the contentions of learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that section 60 (1) of the .....

Raj Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... bench of hon'ble supreme court in the case of election commission vrs. saka venkata subba rao reported in air 195.sc 210.it became necessary to bring 15th amendment to the constitution by which clause (1-a) was added to article 226 of constitution of india and that clause subsequently numbered as sub-clause (2) of ..... his relatives who harass or torture the wife to coerce her or her relatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. the hypertechnical view would be counterproductive and would act against interests of women and against the object for which this provision was added. there is every likelihood that non-exercise of inherent power to quash the 15 ..... village at samstipur and remained there for one week. a daughter was born in march, 2002 out of the said matrimonial wedlock. the respondent was brought to the petitioner's parents house at ranchi in december, 2002 where she remained from 18.12.2002 to 17.01.2003. thereafter, allegation of misbehaviour and cruelty were levelled against the .....

Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... be relevant to discuss the provisions of order vi rule 17 of cpc substituted by act 22 of 2002 with effect from 1st july, 2002, which reads as under:- 17. amendment of pleadings.- the court may at any stage of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and ..... prepared in favour of the private respondents and as such he filed objection under sections 18/30 of the l.a act. when the case was pending for appearance of the respondents, the petitioner filed a petition for amendment in the reference application stating that due to inadvertence, plot no.1585 area 1 decimal has not been included 4 ..... all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions .....

Bihar State Industrial Develop Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... challenge notice dated 03.10.2012 and order dated 17.10.2013 by filing separate writ petition. i.a. no. 756 of 2015 this application has been filed seeking amendment in the writ petition for challenging order dated 13.01.2011 vide memo no. 117 passed by dy. labour commissioner, ranchi. the learned counsel for the petitioner does not ..... advocate for respondent no. 5 : mr. sanjay kumar thakur, advocate order no. 15 dated: 30.07.2015 i.a. no. 8738 of 2013 this application has been filed seeking amendment in the writ petition for challenging notice dated 03.10.2012 issued in case no. 05 of 2010 11 and order dated 17.10.2013 in c.c. no. 05 ..... it cannot be contended that the writ petition was preferred within the extended period of 120 days provided under section 7(7) of the payment of gratuity act. assailing the award dated 19.12.2002, the learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that due to financial crisis the industrial unit of the petitioner was closed and therefore, the respondent was .....

Chhatisgarh Distilleries Ltd Through Its Director Rama Kant Shukla Vs. ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... relief as, it has not disclosed the pendency of criminal cases against it. it is to be noticed that the petitioner, though has filed rejoinder affidavits and application seeking amendment, it has not either averred or produced the copies of first information report of the cases filed against it. in s.p. chengalwaraya naidu (dead) by lrs. vs ..... deceitful intention suppressed the information with regard to pendency of (i) c.b.i. trial no. 29 of 2003 and, (ii) c.b.i. trial no. 375/cp of 2002 both, under section 120(b), 420, 465, 467 and 471 i.p.c. and under section 13(2) read with section 13(1) (c) & (d) of the ..... licenses issued in favour of the respondent nos. 6 & 7 are also under challenge. brief facts2 m/s chhatisgarh distilleries ltd., a company duly incorporated under the companies act, 1956, is engaged in the manufacturing of portable spirit, country liquor and indian made foreign liquor. claiming sufficient financial, technical and infra structural capacity, the petitioner has asserted .....

Central Coalfields Limited Through Its General Manager Admn Shri Biren ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... as request of chanani transport for appointment an external independent monitor for which a direction was sought, initially in the main writ petition, which subsequently was amended on account of certain fresh 7 developments, the findings returned by the learned writ court is that chanani transport could not demonstrate that an external independent ..... risk purchases, failing which alternative arrangements were to be made for recovering the same. the appellant had moved petition under section 33 of the arbitration act before the court alleging that there was no concluded contract in existence between the parties containing any arbitration clause, while the union of india took a ..... was concluded contract between the parties which bound the appellant- firm. the appellant sought injunction under section 41 of the second schedule of the arbitration act and order 39 rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the code of civil procedure restraining the respondent- union of india from appropriating, .....