Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2002 section 32 amendment of section 67 Court: himachal pradesh Year: 1951 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.771 seconds)

Kewal Ram Vs. Bhagwan Dass and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1951HP61

..... , 1948, by which the test of the state courts act, 1943, was amended by substitution of paras. 31, 32 & 35 of the said order for sections 31, 32 & 33 of the said 1943 act, & a different intention not appearing in the said 1949 act, the repeal does not affect the continuance of the said amendments in the state courts act, 1943 made by bhe himachal pradesh (courts) order, 1948 ..... & revision have been conferred upon the judicial commissioner of this state than would have been possible under the civil. p. c. the reason for this conferment of wider powers is patent, namely, that there may be greater scope for the judicial commissioner to rectify the mistakes of subordinate courts in this newly formed state. 4. the history of prevalence of relevant ..... appeal no. 39 of 1950, the custodian evacuee property v. simla banking & industrial co., a decision not yet reported, in which on a comparison of the provisions of sections 13 & 30 of act xxxi [31] of 1950 with those of section 51 & order 40, civil p. c. it was held by harnam ..... sections 96, 100 & 115, civil p. c. the provisions under the himachal pradesh (courts)' order stand repealed by those in the civil p. c. to my mind, this contention has no force, & this for the following reasons. 5. the learned counsel for the pltfs.-resps. cited before me a judgment of the punjab high court dated 20-4-1951 in letters patent .....