Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-21-1981
Reported in : AIR1982AP1
..... moreover, the decisions of this court in re talluri laskshmayya (supra), rendered on 24-9-1971, holding that the provisions of section 3 (1) of the regulation as amended by regulation i of 1970 has no retrospective effect, has been accept and has not been challenged by way of an appeal and ..... be registered under the andhra pradesh co-operative which is composed solely of the members of the scheduled tribe. the said section 3 (1) (a) of the regulation was further amended by a. p regn. no. i of 1970 declaring as null and void even transfers of immovable property situated n ..... 1963 and i of 1970 have no retrospective operation and do not affect transfers made prior to the said regulation or its amendments coming into force and the authorities under section 3 (2) of the regulation have no jurisdiction to pass orders in relation to the immovable property covered by such transfers. ..... from the statute book.'in that view, the learned judges of the letters patent bench held that since section 47 was deleted, the obstruction to transfer was removed and the statutory right under section 53-a of he transfer of property act would be available to the transferee, and thus, agreed with view taken by ..... or is amendments by regulation ii of 1963 or i of 1970, coming into force, cannot be adjudicated upon under s. 3 (2) of the regulation and the same has to be challenged in an appropriate forum constituted for deciding disputes relating to immovable property situate in scheduled areas. 32. applying the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-03-1981
Reported in : AIR1981AP362
..... is twofold: (1) that the impugned order rejecting to record a compromise amounts to a decree within the meaning of section 2(2) of the code of civil procedure, and (2) that notwithstanding the deletion by the amendment act, 104 of 1976, of clause (m) of rule 1 of order xliii, civil procedure code, which provides for an appeal ..... fit to grant such adjournment.'clause (m) of rule 1 of order xliii, as it stood before the amendment act, 104 of 1976, reads,'1. an appeal shall lie from the following orders under the provisions of section 104, namely:--xx xx xx(m) an order under rule 3 of order xxiii recording or refusing to record ..... of order xxiii, rule 3, civil p. c. and the court should not make a decree.(8) the words 'with reference to the suit' occurring in order xxxii, rule 7, civil p. c. must be limited to the rights put in issue in the suit. a fortiori, the words 'with regard to all or ..... 1st defendant is against an order made by the subordinate judge, ongole, rejecting an interlocutory application, i. a. no. 241 of 1980 in o. s. no. 67 of 1980, filed under order xxiii, rule 3, civil p. c. to record compromise in terms of the affidavit to the petition and to pass a compromise decree ..... d. bhushayya v. k. ramakrishnayya, : [1963]2scr499 , the supreme court explained the meaning and comprehension of 'suit' as under (at p. 1891),'order xxxii, rule 7, is one of the provisions designed to safeguard the interests of a minor during the pendency of a suit against hostile, negligent or collusive .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-13-1981
Reported in : AIR1981AP203
..... sanction of the director of marketing. in this case, no such previous sanction was obtained and hence the amendment of bye-law no. 24 (1) is contrary to section 34 of the act, and is therefore invalid. it has already been stated that the director of marketing addressed a letter on ..... the writ petitioners in support of their writ petitions, it is desirable to set out the relevant provisions of the act. act no. 16 of 1966 was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to the regulation of purchase and sale of agricultural produce, livestock and products of livestock and ..... horticulture' and it is not necessary for the respondents to rely on the subsequent part of the definition,32. lastly it was argued on behalf of the petitioners that section 7 (6) of the act infringes article 19(1)(g) of the constitution. it is provided that no person shall purchase or ..... dated 20-10-1967) the government hereby accord sanction as required under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 81 of the andhra pradesh municipalities act, 1965, to all the municipal councils in the state for the levy of ..... act which provided that 'every council may, by resolution, and with the previous sanction of the government also levy a tax on advertisements.' in that case, the government issued a g. o. in the following terms:'in the circumstances stated by the director of municipal administration in his letter second read above (r. o. c, no. 79955/67 .....
Tag this Judgment!