Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 6 persons entitled to apply for patents Court: house of lords Page 1 of about 15 results (0.154 seconds)

Oct 21 2004 (FN)

Kirin-amgen Inc and Others (Appellants) Vs. Hoechst Marion Roussel Lim ...

Court : House of Lords

..... section 125 defines the extent of "the invention": "(1) for the purpose of this act an invention for a patent for which an application has been made or for which a patent has been granted shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be taken to be that specified in a claim of the specification of the application or patent, as the case may be, as interpreted by the description and any drawings contained in that specification, and the extent of the protection conferred by a patent or application for a patent ..... 183, 243 lord diplock offered some observations on the relevance of equivalence to the question of construction: "the question in each case is: whether persons with practical knowledge and experience of the kind of work in which the invention was intended to be used, would understand that strict compliance with ..... the patentee has disclosed a beneficial property which is common to [a class of products] he will be entitled to a patent for all products of that class (assuming them to be new) even though he has not himself made more than ..... ltd [1982] rpc 183, 243 when he said that the new approach should also be applied to the construction of patent claims: "a patent specification should be given a purposive construction rather than a purely literal one derived from applying to it the kind of meticulous verbal analysis in which lawyers are too often tempted by their ..... for manufacturing proteins ("polypeptides") by the expression of recombinant dna developed rapidly after the mid-1970s .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2009 (FN)

Generics (Uk) Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. H Lundbeck a/S (Resp ...

Court : House of Lords

..... echoes the primary requirement of sufficiency which is expressed in almost identical words in section 14(3) of the patents act 1977: the specification of an application shall disclose the invention in a manner which is clear enough and complete enough for the invention to be performed by a person skilled in the art. ..... argument in the appeal has progressed i have formed the view that the appellants can succeed only if they persuade your lordships that there is a general principle in epc article 84 and section 14(5)(c) of the patents act 1977 that requires a product claim to a single chemical compound to be restricted to the inventions technical contribution to the art, and that that means the inventive concept (in this case ..... it was a substantially more effective ssri than the racemate, the respondent applied for, and obtained, the patent the subject of the present appeal, ep (uk) 0,347,066. ..... and claim to be entitled to a patent monopoly to protect. 4 ..... patent is entitled ..... no doubt that the respondent is entitled to patent protection for its process of separating the (+) and ..... heavier-than-air flight was possible, but that did not entitle them to a monopoly of heavier-than-air flying machines ..... of the core (or kernel, or essence) of the inventionthe idea or principle, of more or less general application (see kirin-amgen [2005] rpc 169 paras 112-113) which entitles the inventors achievement to be called inventive. ..... follow that the respondent was entitled to claim the enantiomer. 84 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 1955 (FN)

Tool Metal Manufacturing Company Limited Vs. Tungsten Electric Company ...

Court : House of Lords

..... which entitled them to demand compensation, secondly, that the clause in the 1938 agreement imposing liability to pay compensation was in restraint of trade and illegal, thirdly, that this clause provided for the imposition of a penalty which was irrecoverable at law, and fourthly, that the clause was null and void in that it offended against section 38 (1) (a)of the patents and designs act, 1907 ..... upon a course of negotiation which has the effect of leading one of the parties to suppose that the strict rights arising under the contract will not be enforced, or will be kept in suspense, or held in abeyance, the person who otherwise might have enforced those rights will not be allowed to enforce them where it would be inequitable having regard to the dealings which have thus taken place between the parties. ..... the difficulty in the present case lies in the fact that in the first action, in which it was held that between these parties the principle applies, neither of them in any pleading or other statement between the delivery of the counterclaim in march, 1946, and judgment in april, 1950, took their stand upon its ..... but so also in the present case the circumstances are very unusual: it is hardly possible that they should be repeated, and even if i apply in the amplest way to the termination of the equitable arrangement between the parties in this case the rule applicable to the revocation of licence, i find nothing in the canadian pacific railway case which precludes me from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1950 (FN)

May and Baker Limited and Others Vs. Boots Pure Drug Company Limited

Court : House of Lords

..... to perform under the acts, and his duty under section 14 (2) to grant a patent for one invention only has to be reconciled by considerations of common sense and administrative convenience with his discretion under section 16 (1) to grant a single patent for cognate inventions. ..... judge: "an invention consisting of the production of new substances from known materials by known methods cannot be held to possess subject-matter merely on the ground that the substances produced are new, for the substances produced may serve no useful purpose, in which case the inventor will have contributed nothing to the common stock of useful knowledge (the methods and materials employed being already known) ..... the specification concluded thus:- " the above apparatus represents one particular and practicable mode of applying my invention; but i would here remark, thai i do not intend to confine myself to this particular method ; but i claim as my invention the application of the law or principle of centrifugal force to ..... every patent may be in the prescribed form and shall be granted for one invention only, but the specification may contain more than one claim ; and it shall not be competent for any person in an action or other proceeding to take any objection to a patent on the ground that it has been granted for more than ..... was entitled, on this issue, to take into account, as he did, the extent of the disclaimer which, on any reading of the evidence, was of such magnitude that it might reasonably be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2005 (FN)

Synthon Bv (Appellants) Vs. Smithkline Beecham Plc (Respondents)

Court : House of Lords

..... section 1(1)(a) of the patents act 1977 provides that a patent may be granted only for ..... used in other contexts in the law of patents (see biogen inc v medeva plc [1997] rpc 1, 47) and in particular as a ground for the revocation of a patent under section 72(1)(c): "the specification of the patent does not disclose the invention clearly enough and completely enough for it to be performed by a person skilled in the art". ..... lc in hill v evans (1862) 31 lj(ns) 457, 463: "i apprehend the principle is correctly thus expressed: the antecedent statement must be such that a person of ordinary knowledge of the subject would at once perceive, understand and be able practically to apply the discovery without the necessity of making further experiments and gaining further information before the invention can be made useful. ..... a disclosure of a crystalline form of pms necessarily meant that it would be the form described in the patent, even though a person who had read the patent and set out to make the form described in the application might have thought he was making something different ..... the teaching is not such that skilled persons would at once perceive, understand and be able practically to apply the invention claimed in claim 1 of the patent without the necessity of doing further experiments. ..... lord westbury said that the person skilled in the art must be able practically to apply the discovery "without the necessity of making further experiments and gaining further information before the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2007 (FN)

Obg Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. Allan and Others (Respondents)

Court : House of Lords

..... the case of some intellectual property rights, an exclusive licensee has a statutory right of action: see, for example, section 67(1) of the patents act 1977. ..... most important of these questions, to my mind, are (i) whether claimants can simultaneously assert rights of confidence for the protection of both personal privacy and short-term commercial secrecy (until profitable publication in the mass media of an "exclusive" which waives personal privacy on a selective basis); and (ii) what special rules apply to the publication of photographs of individual claimants. ..... red box toy factory ltd [1999] fsr 785, which show that a bootlegger's activities, although actionable by the owner of the intellectual property rights in question, are not actionable (by statute or at common law) by a contractual licensee entitled to exploit those rights, even if the licensee's profits are demonstrably reduced by the unlawful activities. ..... the receivers honestly believed they were entitled to act on behalf of obg in exercise of their powers as administrative ..... in cases in which there is obviously no reason why a claimant should be entitled to rely on the infringement of a third party's rights, courts are driven to refusing relief on the basis of an artificially narrow meaning of intention which causes trouble in later cases in which the defendant really has used ..... the exclusive licence meant that the licensee was entitled to exploit the design and that the owner contracted not to authorise anyone else to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2005 (FN)

Mh (by Her Litigation Friend, Official Solicitor) (Fc) (Respondent) Vs ...

Court : House of Lords

..... in that it is not attended by adequate provision for the reference to a court of the case of a patient detained pursuant to section 2 in circumstances where a patient has a right to make application to a mental health review tribunal but the patient is incapable of exercising that right on his own initiative; (ii) section 29(4) of the 1983 act is incompatible with article 5(4) of the convention in that it is not attended by provision for the reference to a court of the case of a patient detained pursuant to section 2 of the act whose period of detention is extended by the operation ..... the wording is different from article 5(3), which deals with the rights of a person who has been arrested on suspicion of having committed a criminal offence or to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so: "everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1(c) of this article shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial. . . . ..... these duties were introduced in order to ensure that patients who had not exercised their rights to apply, perhaps because they lacked the capacity or had become institutionalised, were not "lost" in the system. 14. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2004 (FN)

Buchanan (Appellant) Vs. Alba Diagnostics Limited (Respondents) (Scotl ...

Court : House of Lords

..... he applied for a patent for this invention which was granted on 27 march 1996. ..... the operative clause (1.1) declared that "(1) in security of the sum of 400,000 owing by [innovations] to [mr mills] the assignors hereby:- (1.1) assign to [mr mills] their whole right, title and interest past present and future in and to the patents and the applications and all improvements , prolongations and extensions relating therein and thereto (hereinafter referred to as "the charged assets") provided always that there is excluded from the assignation under this clause the ..... alba lodged defences in which it was averred, among other things, that mr buchanan was personally barred from taking proceedings for infringement because he had assigned the benefit of all improvements in the 321 patent to mr mills who had assigned them to alba. ..... the assignation of future improvements is expressed as a dispositive act and it seems to me arguable that it creates no personal obligation but operates entirely in the realm of proprietary rights. ..... it has long been recognised that a purchaser of patent rights is reasonably entitled to protect the commercial value of his purchase by stipulating for the right to any improvements. ..... section 40(1) of the court of session act 1988 provides that that it shall be competent to appeal from the inner house to the house of lords: "(a) without the leave of the inner house, against a judgment on the whole merits of the cause, or against an interlocutory judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2008 (FN)

Conor Medsystems Incorporated (Respondents) Vs. Angiotech Pharmaceutic ...

Court : House of Lords

..... is about how you identify the concept embodied in the invention which may constitute the inventive step for the purposes of article 56 of the epc and section 1(1)(b) of the patents act 1977. 4. ..... 19 july 1993 angiotech applied for a us patent which is the priority document for the patent in suit. ..... however, he meant that it did not claim that taxol would work, then i would regard it as a very narrow approach to the meaning of the patent, more suitable to old-fashioned statutory construction than to what the skilled practitioner in cardio-vascular intervention would have understood. ..... conor medsystems inc (conor), an american competitor, applied in both the united kingdom and the netherlands for revocation of the patent on the ground that the claimed invention was ..... after referring to two items of prior art diplock lj said at p 495: it is enough that the person versed in the art would assess the likelihood of success as sufficient to warrant actual trial. . . ..... in my opinion, however, the invention is the product specified in a claim and the patentee is entitled to have the question of obviousness determined by reference to his claim and not to some vague paraphrase based upon the extent of his disclosure in the ..... the title of the patent is anti-angiogenic compositions and methods of use and the patent, at least as originally applied for, is by no means confined to their use on ..... it was not a sufficient reason for not applying the ordinary principles of obviousness to the claimed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2008 (FN)

Savage (Respondent) Vs. South Essex Partnership Nhs Foundation Trust ( ...

Court : House of Lords

..... husband, mr savage, who, as the person presumably entitled to her estate, could have instituted an action under the 1934 act and who may also have been a dependant of his wife for the purposes of the 1976 act, was not willing to institute either ..... where there is an allegation that the authorities have violated their positive obligation to protect the right to life in the context of their above-mentioned duty to prevent and suppress offences against the person, it must be established to its satisfaction that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk to the life of an identified individual or individuals from the ..... this, in kilin v turkey (application no 40145/98) 7 june 2005, para 41, the court simply referred to lvarez ram n as showing that it was incontestable (sans conteste) that the duty to prevent suicides applied in the case of conscripts: cette obligation, qui vaut sans conteste dans le domaine du service militaire obligatoire, implique avant tout pour les etats le devoir primordial de mettre en place un cadre l gislatif et administratif ..... opinion, be no different if the patient who had died were an inmate in a prison hospital or a mentally ill patient who had been sectioned under section 3 and transferred to the hospital wing of the mental hospital on account of some medical condition. ..... in selfe v ilford and district hospital management committee the times 26 november 1970. ..... in 1970 she was diagnosed as suffering from .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //