Court : Chennai
Decided on : Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: W.A.No.857 of 2015 is preferred under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 9.4.2015 passed in W.P. (MD) Nos.16935, 16986 and 17875 of 2014 and W.P. Nos. 33234 and 33235 of 2014.) Common Judgment: Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The instant appeals arise from the common order dated 9.4.2015 passed in W.P.Nos.16935, 16986, 17875, 33234 and 33235 of 2014. Notwithstanding service of notice and also names printed in the cause list, none has chosen to appear, except the respondent in W.A. No.857 of 2015. 2. The writ petitioners filed the writ petitions separately, seeking to quash the G.O.Ms.No.534, Home (Courts II) Department dated 5th August, 2014, wherein by notification the State Government, exercising powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Central Act 34 of 2008) read with sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, constituted a Special Court at Chennai (Poonamallee) for the trial of the following cases : ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1303 of 2015 Sami Nadar (Died) Thenkaraimuthu : Petitioner Vs. Johnson Moses : Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure to call for the records of the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.113 of 2014 in O.S.No.261 of 2008 on the file of Principal District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate Court, Nanguneri, dated 05.03.2015 and set aside the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh ^For Respondent : Mr.H.Arumugam :ORDER The petitioner and his father filed a suit in O.S.No.261 of 2008. The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner filed an application to restore the suit after condoning the delay of 1045 days. The application was dismissed by the learned Trial Judge. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner is before this Court.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned coun...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.662 of 2005 and C.M.P.(MD)No.3577 of 2005 Manimegalai : Petitioner Vs. 1.Panaian 2.Vanthiyathevan 3.Gokila Vani 4.Kamala 5.Vimala : Respondents Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order of the Trial Court in I.A.No.823 of 2004 in O.S.No.106 of 2003 on the file of District Munsif Court, Thiruppathur (Sub Court, Sivagangai) dated 20.04.2005. !For Petitioner : Mr.Praveen Kumar ^For Respondents : Mr.V.Gopalsamy :ORDER The Trial Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner to condone the delay of 370 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree. The order dated 20 April, 2005, in I.A.No.823 of 2004 is under challenge in this Civil Revision Petition.2. The predecessor-in-interest of the respondents filed a suit against the petitioner for declaration and recovery of posses...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.559 of 2015 1.Paraman 2.Marimuthu : Petitioners Vs. Kumarayee Ammal : Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside and reverse the order passed in I.A.No.98 of 2013 in unnumbered A.S.No.. of 2013 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul, dated 23.01.2015. !For Petitioners : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan ^For Respondent : Mr.V.Maria Selvaraj :ORDER The first Appellate Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioners to condone the delay in preferring the appeal. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners are before this Court.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent.3. The respondent filed a suit in O.S.No.33 of 2006 against the petitioners. It was a suit for specific performance. The Trial Court decreed the suit, not...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1357 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 1.V.Chelliah 2.S.Murugan : Petitioners Vs. R.Thilagavathi : Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.09.2011 made in I.A.No.469 of 2011 in O.S.No.226 of 2008 on the file of District Munsif Court, Theni. !For Petitioners : Mr.K.Appadurai ^For Respondent : Mr.V.K.Saravanan :ORDER The learned Trial Judge wanted the petitioners to explain each day's delay in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree. The application to condone the delay was dismissed solely on the said ground. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioners are before this Court.2. The respondent filed a suit against the petitioners on the basis of a promissory note. The petitioners failed to appear before the Trial Court and the same resulted in passing a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-29-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1119 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 S.Gajendran ...Petitioner Vs Natarajan ...Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order dated 10.03.2015 passed in I.A.No.651 of 2012 in O.S.No.352 of 2008 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Thoothukudi. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai ^For Respondent : Mr.N.Subramanian :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 10 March, 2015 in I.A.No.651 of 2012, whereby and whereunder, the learned Principal District Munsif, Thoothukudi, dismissed the application filed by the petitioner to condone the delay in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent.3. The respondent filed a suit against the peti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-29-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1038 of 2015 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2015 1.Rajamani 2.Krishnamoorthy 3.Ramu @ Ramakrishnan : Petitioners Vs. Paramakudi Ariya Vaisiya Sabai Through its President Door No.7/121, Swami Sannathi Thety, Paramakudi Nagar, Ramanathapuram District. : Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order dated 15 April 2015 passed in I.A.No.157 of 2015 in O.S.No.102 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Paramakudi. !For Petitioners : Mr.Chengizkhan ^For Respondent : Mr.D.Senthil :ORDER This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 15 April 2015 in I.A.No.157 of 2015 in O.S.No.102 of 2012, whereby and whereunder, the learned District Munsif, Pramakudi was pleased to dismiss the application filed by the petitioners to condone the delay of 365 days in filing the applicati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-29-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1577 of 2015 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2015 Sundharavadivel : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Medical Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. 4.The Tahsildar, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.. : Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 15 April 2015 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2013 in unnumbered A.S.No.... of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Palani (Camp at Kodaikanal). !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthugeethayan ^For Respondent : No Appearance :ORDER The application filed by the respondents to condone the delay of 3050 days in filing the appeal was allowed by the learned Subordinate Judge, having camp at Kodaikanal. The said order is under challenge in thi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-29-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1039 of 2015 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2015 1.Palanikumar 2.Latha : Petitioners Vs. Paramakudi Ariya Vaisiya Sabai Through its President Door No.7/121, Swami Sannathi Thety, Paramakudi Nagar, Ramanathapuram District. : Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order dated 15 April 2015 passed in I.A.No.153 of 2015 in O.S.No.103 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Paramakudi. !For Petitioners : Mr.Chengizkhan ^For Respondent : Mr.D.Senthil :ORDER This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 15 April 2015 in I.A.No.153 of 2015 in O.S.No.103 of 2012, whereby and whereunder, the learned District Munsif, Pramakudi was pleased to dismiss the application filed by the petitioners to condone the delay of 365 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-29-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.184 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 of 2013 and 1 of 2014 1.Tmt.V.Prema 2.V.Krishnan 3.V.Paulraj @ Balaji : Petitioners Vs. 1.Tmt.Nirmala Devi @ Thayar 2.Tmt.Baby 3.Tmt.Santha : Respondents Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair order and ex-order passed in E.A.No.135 of 2012 in E.P.No.199 of 2010 in O.S.No.469 of 2004, dated 19.12.2012 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Madurai. !For Petitioners : Mr.S.Manohar ^For Respondents : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan :ORDER The learned Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town, refused to condone the delay of 61 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte order in E.P.No.199 of 2010 and the same compelled the judgment debtors to file this Civil Revision Petition.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appear...
Tag this Judgment!