Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2017 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.444 seconds)

Jan 03 2017 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited Vs. M/s. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2017

Sanjay Kumar, J. This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the order dated 26.08.2014 passed by the learned Company Judge in Company Petition No.235 of 2012 whereby, the said petition filed for winding up of the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (for brevity, the APIIC ), was admitted and advertisement thereof was permitted to be carried out in the event the APIIC failed to deposit the sum of Rs.8,18,36,584/- to the credit of the company petition within a time frame. Aggrieved thereby, the APIIC preferred this appeal. By order dated 06.11.2014, the appeal was admitted and interim stay of operation of the order under appeal was granted for a period of six weeks. The said stay was extended until further orders on 18.12.2014. Application No.7 of 2015 was filed by the respondent, the petitioner in C.P.No.235 of 2012, to vacate the interim order dated 06.11.2014. Thereupon, this Court was informed on 22.06.2015 that the APIIC was attem...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2017 (HC)

Exotic Granites Exports Vs. State of Telangana, represented by its Sec ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-27-2017

Common Order: 1. Since these two Writ Petitions are connected, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of these writ petitions by way of this common order. For the sake of convenience, this Court deems it appropriate to refer to the status of the parties as arrayed in W.P.No.16298 of 2008. 2. W.P.16298 of 2008 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the following relief: To issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent vide Memo No.5336/M.II(1)/2008-2 dated 11.7.2008 wherein according permission to the 5th respondent to reject quarry lease application of petitioner and further according permission under Rule 12(5) (b) of A.P.M.M.C.Rules, 1966 to the 5th respondent for overlooking the priority and considering the application of 6th respondent for grant of Quarry lease for quarrying black granite over an extent of 4.916 hectares in Ingurthy Reserve Forest, Warangal District as...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //