Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-31-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.13832 OF201331-12-2014 KMK Event Management Ltd.Petitioner The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes . Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.Dr.T.Ramesh Babu Counsel for respondent:GP for Commercial Taxes ?. Citations: 1) (2008) 12 VST3712) (2006) 145 STC913) (2004) 135 STC4804) (2011) 37 VST2265) (2011) 46 VST576) (2000) 1 SCC521= (2000) 117 STC17) 2013 (6) ALT723(D.B) 8) Judgment in WP No.4516 of 2013 dated 18.02.2013 9) Order in WPMP No.23591 of 2012 in W.P.No.18430 of 2012 dated 25.06.2012 10) AIR1973SC252411) (1997) 10 SCC29112) AIR1986SC66213) 1990(3) ALT38214) AIR1968SC647 (1968) 2 SCR15415) (1901 AC495: (1900-03) All ER Rep. 1 (HL) 16) AIR2001SC198017) (2001) 5 SCC40718) (2001).SCC67619) (2001) 8 SCC54020) AIR1987SC166821) AIR1987SC216622) (1950) 2 ALL ER2923) AIR1957Punjab 5 24) (1984) 2 ALLER125) (1979) 2 All ER d 433, (1979) 1 WLR62026) Judgment in Civil Appeal No.1421 o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-29-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NOs.13418 OF2014and batch 29-10-2014 M/s.Inox Air Products Ltd.Petitioner The Assistant Commissioner (CT)-IX, Enforcement Wing, Hyderabad and otheRs.Respondents Counsel for the petitioner:Sr.Karan Talwar Counsel for respondents: Sr.P. Balaji Varma, Learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes HEAD NOTE: ?. Citations: 1) (2005) 139 STC504(Kerala HC DB) 2) (2010) Vol.35 VST478(Madras High Court DB) 3) (2014) NTN (Vol.54) 164 = (2014) VIL38ALH- (judgment in Writ Tax No.1098 of 2007 dated 11.02.2014 4) AIR1963SC6655) (2004) 137 STC686) (2011) 45 VST477) (2003) 7 SCC5178) (2008) 14 SCC1719) (1972) 1 W.L.R.241 (H.L) 10) (1997) 105 STC31811) AIR1989SC62212) AIR1980SC61113) (2004) 6 SCC28114) (1990) 79 STC351THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION Nos.13418 & 16782 Of 2014 Common Order: (per Honble Sr.Justice Ramesh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-09-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.9784 OF201309-09-2014 Venkatrayapuram Industrial Area Township rep., by its Member and Temporary Chairman Sr.K. Rama Seshayya and others . Petitioners Government of A.P.rep., by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department and otheRs.Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.C.V.Mohan Reddy, Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sr.M.R.K.Chakravarthy, Learned Counsel Counsel for respondents: Learned Special Government Pleader for Learned Advocate General; Sr.B.D.Maheswara Reddy; Sr.K. Chidambaram and Sr.Dasari SVversus Prasad. HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) (2001) 2 SCC1602) (1981) 1 SCC5683) AIR1962SC10444) (2003) 6 SCC2305) (2005) 10 SCC4956) AIR1997SC1125= (1997) 3 SCC2617) AIR1999SC17238) 1995 Suppl (3) SCC6439) (1999) 6 SCC46410) (1999) 6 SCC66711) (1982) 3 SCC235 1982 SCC (L&S) 275 12) 2005(4) Laws (APHC) 106 13) (2002) 1 SCC3314) (1992) 4 SCC30515) (1988) 4 SCC22616) (2000) 7 SCC55217) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-12-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY REFERENCE CASE No.82 of 1999 12-06-2014 M/s. Priyadarshini Spinning Mills Ltd.,Hyderabad Applicant Commissioner of Income-tax AP-I, Hyderabad.... Respondent !Counsel for the Applicant: Sri S. Ravi Counsel for the Respondent :Sri S.R. Ashok : ?.Cases referred :1969. AIR267HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY REFERENCE CASE No.82 of 1999 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The Finance Act, 1998 brought about substantial changes in the Income Tax Act, particularly, in the regime of depreciations. Till then, depreciations used to be allowed on individual assets, held by an assesee, whether an individual or an industry or a business undertaking. Through the amendment, the concept of block assets was introduced. The expression block assets is defined under Section 11 of Section 2 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (for short the Act) as, pool of tangi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-27-2014
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT APPEAL No.1150 OF2010 27-03-2014 The State of Andhra Pradesh,Rep., by its Secretary, Hyderabad and 4 others. ...Petitioners G.V.Mohan and 5 others..Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri N.Sridhar Reddy, Spl. Government Pleader Counsel for respondents 1 to 3: Sri S.R.Ashok senior counsel for K.Govardhan Reddy Counsel for respondent No.4 : Sri M.Surender Rao, Standing counsel for HMDA Counsel for respondent No.5 : Sri Y.Madhusudhan Counsel for respondent No.6 : Sri Y.Rama Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases cited:1. AIR1987SC2179(1987) 3 SCC7112 (2003) 8 SCC7403 (1999) 8 SCC6924 (2003) 4 SCC1615 (1999) 4 SCC4036 (2002) 5 SCC3377 (2008) 4 SCC6158 (1987) 2 SCC5559 AIR1966SC73510 (2010) 3 SCC470THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT APPEAL No.1150 OF2010 WRIT APPEAL No.1151 OF2010AND WRIT APPEAL No.30 OF2011COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per G. Rohini,J) The common order dated 8.10.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.267 of 1995 and batch 20-03-2014 Kakarla Rosenna and others ....Appellants Thammineni Narasappa and others.... Respondents #Kakarla Rosenna....Petitioner $T.Narasappa and others.... Respondents Counsel for the Appellants : Sri V.Ravinder Rao & Sri O.Manoher Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri R.Subba Rao : : ?. Cases referred:1. AIR2003SC19892. AIR1963SC15163. AIR-2001-SC-965 4. (2003(5)-SCC-89) 5. 1975(1)SCC2126. AIR-1976-SC-634 7. AIR-1969-SC-1144 8. 2011(8) SCALE2409. AIR1989SC19310. AIR1987SC124211. AIR1966SC735 12. AIR1954SC45813. AIR1953SC23514. AIR1995SC16715. AIR1988SC719B) 16. 1991 (3) SCC33117. 1998(5)-ALD-349 18. 2003(8)-Supreme Today-194 at 196 19. (2009) 3 SCC28720. AIR1984SC66421. (1994) 5 SCC16722. 1911 ( 35) Bombay-169 23. 1915(39) Bombay 441 24. AIR1951PC725. AIR1963SC185at 193 26. 1870 (7) Bombay HCAC15327. 1869 (12) MIA35028. 1909 (36) Cal 824 29. AIR1961SC130230. 1906 (28) All. 377 31. AIR1926PC192732. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-19-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.854 of 1998 19-03-2014 Dakarapu Lakshmana Swamy..Appellant Maddula Narasimha Rao and others....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant:Sri A.Ramalingeshwara Rao Counsel for respondents: Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1957AP3862.1952(2) MLJ-448 3. AIR1961patna Page 158 4. AIR1956SC5935. AIR2012SC17276. AIR1960SC3357. AIR1936PC2648. AIR1954Bombay 95 9. AIR2006SC283210. 2010(3) Scale 569 11. AIR1956SC593para 23 page 602 12. AIR1965SC241at para 17&18 13. AIR1951SC46914. AIR1971Mad 184 15. 1996(1) SCC63916.(2004) 10 SCC63917. AIR1964SC125418. 1993 (4) SCC37519.1997 (7) SCC56720. 1996(8) SCC12821. 1995(6) SCC52322. 2013 (2) ALT268para 7 23. 2008(6) ALD200224. 1976 (2) APLJ page 16 25. AIR1956C47026. AIR1953SC48727. AIR1952Mad.419 28. AIR1957AP page 8 29. AIR2003SC198930 AIR1963SC151631. AIR-2001-SC-965 32. (2003(5)-SCC-89) 33. 1975(1)SCC21234. AIR-1976-SC-634 35. AIR-1969-SC-1144 36. 2011(8) SCALE24037. AIR198...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-10-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.12214 OF200810-03-2014 N.Srinivas and another...Petitioners The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary H.M.A & U.D.A Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and others.. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu Counsel for the Respondents: G.P.for Municipal Admn. & Urban Area Development : : ?.Cases referred 1 AIR1956SC1102 1981 (1) ALT463 1994 (3) ALT73(F.B.) 4 AIR1991SC14535 1921 (2) K.B. 716 6 (1995) 5 SCC762HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.12214 and 17943 of 2008 In spite of Dr.Thomas Fuller's warning in 1733 saying 'be ye never so high, the law is above you' and reiterated later by Lord Denning, still some feel that they can violate law with impunity.2. These two writ petitions are disposed of by a common order in view of the common issue involved in them. FACTS OF THE CASE:3. The parties are described, for the sake of convenience, as they are array...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-03-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.27112 of 2013 03-01-2014 Aditya Educational Society, rep., by its Chairma, Dr. M.M.Vilekar and others.....Petitioners The Union of India rep., by its Secretary, Ministry of Medical & Health, New Delhi and others...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.C.V.Mohan Reddy, Learned Senior Counsel for Sr.P.S.Rajasekhar, Counsel for respondent No.1: Mrs.S.Nanda, Standing Counsel; Counsel for respondent No.2: Sr.C. Gunaranjan; Counsel for respondent No.3: Sr.A. Prabhakar Rao, Standing Counsel. HEAD NOTE: ?. Citations: 1) (1998) 6 SCC1312) (2001) 10 SCC2643) (2004) 6 SCC764) 2013 (11) SCALE294= (2013) 10 SCC605) AIR1979SC7656) (1999) 7 SCC1207) (2011) 4 SCC6238) (2007) 15 SCC4359) (1996) 6 SCC66510) AIR1959SC71311) (1985) 1 SCC59112) AIR1957SC28113) (1955) 2 SCR48314) (1989) 1 SCC32115) (1944) 71 IA113 122 : AIR1944PC7116) (2008) 13 SCC18517) 1992 SUPPL.(2) SCC65118) (2004) 1 SCC57419) (1962) 2 SCR15920) AIR1965SC172821) AIR1991...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-02-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL F.C.A.No.196 of 2009 02-01-2014 S.Mahender.Appellant Smt.Shalini.Respondent Counsel for appellant : Sr.G.M.Mohiuddin Counsel for respondent : Mrs.S.Vani HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : 1) AIR1984Delhi 139 2) 2008(4) ALD728(DB) 3) (1992) II DMC244THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL F.C.A.No.196 of 2009 JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,,J.The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 10.02.2005. The respondent filed F.C.O.P.No.143 of 2006 in the Family Court, Hyderabad, against the appellant, under Sections 12(1)(c) and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').for annulment of the marriage. She has also prayed for return of a sum of Rs.6,50,000/- said to have been given as dowry and Rs.5,00,000/- towards cost of gold, silver and other articles said to have been presented at the time of the marriage. The ground pleaded by the resp...
Tag this Judgment!