Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 22 results (0.175 seconds)

Abhay Singh Surana Vs. Indian Rayon and Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC1870; (1989)1CALLT52(SC); JT1988(3)SC458; 1988(2)SCALE770; (1988)4SCC358; [1988]Supp2SCR204; 1988(2)LC535(SC)

..... been the subject-matter of various adjudications and interpretations by the high court. it enables the high court to exercise the extraordinary original civil jurisdiction. the letters patent contemplates two contingencies for the high court to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction, namely, on agreement of the parties to that effect, the suits be transferred and, secondly ..... civil court at calcutta against the jayshree and the respondent herein. on 25th march, 1986, the respondent filed a title suit no. 545/86 under order 39(1) and (2) of the civil procedure code praying for temporary injunction restraining the appellant from disconnecting electricity in the said premises.5. it is alleged and was ..... on 21st july, 1976.4. on 29th august, 1985, a notice under section 106 of the transfer of property act, read with section 13(6) of the w.b. premises tenancy act, 1956 (hereinafter called 'the act'), to quit, vacate and hand-over vacant possession on the last date of the following month, was issued to .....

M.L. JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC669; JT1988(3)SC499; 1988(2)SCALE370; (1988)4SCC121; [1988]Supp2SCR496; 1989(1)SLJ178(SC); 1988(2)LC761(SC); 1988(2)WLN344

..... to issue orders in similar terms.19. the learned attorney general with his usual fairness frankly conceded that there is patent disparity in the pension fixed for the petitioner at rs. 26,000. shri kuldip singh, learned additional solicitor ..... a member of the rajasthan higher judicial service having been a district and sessions judge for the period from november 9, 1970 to july 1, 1975. on his appointment as a judge of the rajasthan high court, the petitioner opted, for ..... entitled to pension at much higher rates.18. the state government of uttar pradesh by its notification no. 14/1/39/84 cx (i) dated may 31, 1988 has brought about a change in clause (b) of paragraph 2 ..... act 20 of 1988 and in depriving him of the benefit of additional relief of rs. 250 per month w.e.f. january 1, 1986 was wholly misconceived and unwarranted. we not only found the contentions of the petitioner to have force but also to be irrefutable ones.17. to bring out more forcefully how the governmental action is patently .....

United States Vs. Fausto

Court : US Supreme Court

..... whether the csra implicitly works a partial repeal of tucker act/back pay act jurisdiction. [ footnote 2/12 ] "the merit systems protection board, along with its special counsel, is made responsible for safeguarding the effective operation of the ..... the merit systems protection board and the united states claims court. in consequence, all claims by federal employees brought under the csra or the tucker act/back pay act will ultimately be subject to review by the federal circuit. the federal circuit's exclusive jurisdiction in this area renders it uniquely qualified to determine ..... .g., morton v. mancari, 417 u. s. 535 (1971) (equal employment opportunity act of 1972, 86 stat. 103 42 u.s.c. 2000e et seq. (1970 ed., supp. 1i), did not negate employment preference for indians expressly established by the indian reorganization act of 1934, 48 stat. 984, 25 u.s.c. 461 et seq. ). but .....

Doypack Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC782; [1989]65CompCas1(SC); (1988)1CompLJ225(SC); 1988(36)ELT201(SC); JT1988(1)SC304; 1988(1)SCALE273; (1988)2SCC299; [1988]2SCR962; 1988(2)LC54(SC)

..... expression of expansion and not of contraction.51. as to what as undertaking means, has been clarified in r.c. cooper v. union of india : [1970]3scr530 , where the act of 1969 was challenged. it was held that the meaning of the expression 'undertaking' is a going concern as distinct from its assets and liabilities. it was ..... the textile undertakings and no other. there existed no public purpose, according to shri nariman, for acquiring these shares. the public purposes mentioned in the act with reference to article 39(b) and (c) related to the acquisition of only the textile undertakings of swadeshi cotton mills and not acquisition of the synthetic fibre undertakings of ..... used in the expansive sense, as per decisions of courts, meanings found in a standard dictionaries, and the principles of broad and liberal interpretation in consonance with article 39(b) and (c) of the constitution.49. the words 'arising out of' have been used in the sense that it comprises purchase of shares and lands from .....

City of St. Louis Vs. Praprotnik

Court : US Supreme Court

..... as to constitute a custom or usage' with the force of law," adickes v. s. h. kress & co., 398 u. s. 144 , 398 u. s. 167 -168 (1970), we naturally ascribe their acts to the municipalities themselves, and hold the latter responsible for any resulting constitutional deprivations. monell, which involved a challenge to a city-wide policy requiring all pregnant employees ..... appeals that the city "was responsible for the deprivation of petitioner's constitutional rights." id. at 445 u. s. 633 ; see also id. at 445 u. s. 655 , n. 39. petitioner had been fired as city chief of police without a notice of reasons and without a hearing, after the city council and the city manager had publicly reprimanded him ..... were unheard of in 1871, has been repeatedly reaffirmed. see, e.g., owen v. city of independence, 445 u. s. 622 , 445 u. s. 633 , 445 u. s. 655 , n. 39 (1980); polk county v. dodson, 454 u. s. 312 , 454 u. s. 325 (1981); tuttle, 471 u.s. at 471 u. s. 818 , and n. 5 (plurality opinion); id. .....

Basic, Inc. Vs. Levinson

Court : US Supreme Court

..... ed va.1980) (merger negotiations material four months before agreement-in-principle reached). cf. susquehanna corp. v. pan american sulphur co., 423 f.2d 1075, 1084-1085 (ca5 1970) (holding immaterial "unilateral offer to negotiate" never acknowledged by target and repudiated two days later); berman v. gerber products co., 454 f.supp. 1310, 1316, 1318 (wd ..... states court of appeals for the sixth circuit syllabus the securities and exchange commission's rule 10b-5, promulgated under 10(b) of the securities exchange act of 1934 (act), prohibits, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security, the making of any untrue statement of a material fact or the omission of ..... a different aspect than when the issue is, for example, an inaccuracy in a publicly disseminated press release." sec v. geon industries, inc., 531 f.2d 39, 48 (ca2 1976). devising two different standards of materiality, one for situations where insiders have traded in abrogation of their duty to disclose or abstain (or for .....

Gardebring Vs. Jenkins

Court : US Supreme Court

..... so desires by other individuals of his choice in the various aspects of the application process and the redetermination of eligibility. . . ." 35 fed.reg. 18402 (1970) (emphasis added). when the provision was adopted several months later, the reference to "recipients" was eliminated, even though the reference to "redetermination of eligibility" ..... sum rule and how any worker's compensation or disability payments would be treated, the question does arise regarding whether the recipients could have acted any differently if they had known." "the federal policy regarding the treatment of lump sum payments is punitive, and ignores the basic purposes of ..... makes this omission apparent. an "applicant" is "a person who has, directly, or through his authorized representative, or where incompetent or incapacitated, through someone acting responsibly for him, made application for public assistance from the agency administering the program, and whose application has not been terminated." 206.10(b)(1). .....

Coffee Board, Karnataka, Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC1487; (1988)2CompLJ161(SC); JT1988(2)SC448; 1988(1)SCALE1055; (1988)3SCC263; [1998]Supp1SCR348; [1988]70STC162(SC)

..... how it was understood by some. this decision in our opinion concludes all the issues in the instant appeal.20. in 1970 purchase tax was introduced. the karnataka sales tax act was amended by karnataka act 9 of 1970 and section 6 was substituted. the new section 6 provided for the levy of purchase tax on every dealer who in the ..... vis-a-vis, coffee board in respect of the sales tax due and payable on the transactions between the parties in appropriate proceedings. re. civil writ petition no. 39 of 1986. there will be no order in this petition. but it is made clear that this is without prejudice to the right of the parties taking appropriate proceedings ..... or essentially consensual binding core or character of the transaction. analysing the act, it was observed that according to the definition of 'sale' in the two acts the transactions between the appellants in that case and the allottees or nominees, as the case may be, were patently sales because in one case the property in the cement and in .....

Jaipal and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC1504; JT1988(2)SC528a; 1988(1)SCALE1198; (1988)3SCC354a; [1988]Supp1SCR411; 1988(2)LC367(SC)

..... of similar nature in the same department therefore the appointment on a temporary basis or on regular basis does not affect the doctrine of equal pay for equal work. article 39(d) contained in part iv of the constitution ordains the state to direct its policy towards securing equal pay for equal work for both men and women. though article ..... 39 is included in the chapter of directive principles of state policy, but it is fundamental in nature. the purpose of the article is to fix certain social and economic goals .....

Felder Vs. Casey

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to override. thus, however understandable or laudable the state's interest in controlling liability expenses might otherwise be, it is patently incompatible with the compensatory goals of the federal legislation, as are the means the state has chosen to effectuate it. ..... against governmental entities or officers. sambs v. nowak, 47 wis.2d 158, 167, 177 n.w.2d 144, 149 (1970). "congress," we have previously noted, "surely did not intend to assign to state courts and legislatures a conclusive role in ..... the actual notice' requirement is difficult to satisfy." ibid. i agree that a sufficiently burdensome notice of claim requirement could effectively act as a statute of limitations. the facts of this case, however, will not support such a characterization of the wisconsin ..... u. s. 199 , 239 u. s. 201 (1915). see also engel v. davenport, 271 u. s. 33 , 271 u. s. 38 -39 (1926); mcallister v. magnolia petroleum co., 357 u. s. 221 , 357 u. s. 228 (1958) (brennan, j., concurring). similarly, where the .....