Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.322 seconds)

Jan 01 1980 (HC)

Shah Mansur Peer Dargah and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-01-1980

Reported in : AIR1980Kant118; 1980(1)KarLJ469

ORDER1. In these petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 28-4-1977 of the Administrator, Karnataka Board of Wakf (hereinafter referred to as 'the Board') in Case No. LCC 40-3-M (Exhibit E in W. P. No. 4485 of 1977). As the challenge of the petitioners in all these cases is directed against one and the same order of the Board, I propose to dispose of them by a common order in the course of my order, I will refer to the documents produced by the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 4485 of 1977.2. An ancient Dargah called as 'Shah Mansur Peer Dargah of Bilgi' District Bijapur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Wakf) endowed with various properties had been registered as a public trust under the provisions of Bombay Public Trust Act of 1950 (Bombay Act No. XXIX of 1950) (hereinafter referred to as the 'Bombay Act') (Exhibit C). The uniform Wakf Act of 1954 (Central Act No. 29 of 1954) (hereinafter 'referred to as 'The Act') was extended to t...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 1980 (HC)

i.T.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-04-1980

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT690(Kar); 1980(2)KarLJ39

1. This Writ Petition is filed by India Tobacco Company Limited (a company duly incorporated and registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956), and by one of its shareholders. The Petitioners herein shall be referred to as the Company in the course of this order for convenience. The respondents are the Union of India represented by the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue and Insurance) (hereinafter referred to as the Revenue), the Superintendent of Central Excise, Concurrent Assessment and Inspection Group having his office in the Company's factory at Bangalore, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, III Division, having his office at Bangalore City and the Appellate Collector of Central Excise at Madras having his office at Madras. 2. The Company is a manufacturer of tobacco products. The company has several factories in different parts of India. One of its factories is situated at Bangalore and tobacco products like cigarettes, tobacco and other tobacco products manufac...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //