Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-16-1965
Reported in : AIR1966AP137; 1966CriLJ512
ORDERAnantanarayana Ayyar, J.1. The petitioner gave a complaint to the Police. After investigation, the Police filed a charge-sheet. The Assistant Sessions Judge, Guntur tried the accused. Ultimately, he convicted the accused and sentenced him. At the trial, the petitioner complainant deposed as P.W. 1. The accused filed an appeal before the Sessions Judge, Guntur and were completely acquitted by him. Thereupon, the petitioner filed Criminal Revision Petition in this court praying for revision of the lower appellate Court's judgment of acquittal. Along with the revision petition, he filed a certified copy of the judgment of the lower appellate court but he did not file a certified copy of the judgment of the trial court. When the office required him to file a certified copy duly stamped, he came forward with a contention that he was not bound to furnish a certified copy. Therefore, the office put up the matter before me for hearing.2. The petitioner produced a copy of the trial court's...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-29-1965
Reported in : AIR1968AP228
Kumarayya, J.1. The office has raised an objection as regards the maintainability of this L.P.A. for want of leave of the Court as contemplated by Clause 15 of the Letters Patent on the ground that the order appealed against was passed in C.M. Ps. in Second Appeal and, therefore, the question whether the party has an unqualified statutory right of appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act was therefore of little moment. It would appear from the facts of the case that in the course of Second Appeal 203 of 1962, the parties agreed that the subject matter of dispute may be referred to the Arbitrators. At their request this Court directed the dispute to be submitted to the Arbitrators for decision. The Arbitrator passed an award and remitted the same to the Court. The appellant herein raised objection thereto and requested the Court to set aside the award. The Court heard the arguments and finally passed an order refusing to set aside the award and directed that a decree be drawn in t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-08-1965
Reported in : AIR1967AP353
Ekbote, J.(1) This writ appeal and the writ petition involve a common question as to the interpretation of Art. 16(4) and Art. 15(4) of the Constitution of India. They can therefore be conveniently disposed of under one common judgment.(2) The writ appeal is from the order of our learned brother, Gopalakrishnan Nair J., given on 26-11-1964 by which he dismissed the writ petition in limine (3) The writ petition 1475/64 is filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of certiorari for bringing up the record relating to the Government of India communications Nos. 15/5/61-SCT-IV dated 14-8-1961 and F. 5-3-63-SCH-IV dated 5/4/1963 and to quash the same and to issue a direction to the respondent to continue the list of backward classes which was in vogue upto the year 1959-60.(4) The material facts in regard to the writ appeal are that the two petitioner filed an application for the issue of a writ of Mandamus for declaring the notification issued by the Andhra Pradesh Pu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-24-1965
Reported in : AIR1967AP299; 1967CriLJ1470
Gopalakrishnan Nair, J.(1) This contempt case was filed by the learned Advocate General for punishing the respondent for contempt of the High Court the subordinate judiciary and also the Election Tribunal constituted under the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The respondent is the Editor, Printer and Publisher of a weekly called 'The Andhra Herald'. In its issue dated 29-11-1964, he published certain articles which are alleged to constitute to contempt of Court. 'The Andhra Herald' is a bilingual weekly. A good part of it is in English and the rest in Telugu. Portions of the articles published in both these languages are relied upon by the learned Advocate General to make out that the respondent is guilty of contempt of Court.On the first page, in the English Section of the weekly, under the caption 'You will hardly believe' the following passages occur:'That in strict variance with the directions of the Supreme Court, Justice Sreenivasachari's one man election...
Tag this Judgment!