Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Sep-13-2013
D.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 177/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER D.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 177/2010 Smt. Champa & Ors. versus Rooplal Date of Order:13. h September, 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Mr. Sajjan Singh with Mr. Manish Rajpurohit, for the petitioners. Dr. Javed Moyal with Mr. Mohsin Dhera, for the respondent. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:-(Oral) (Per Jain, J.) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 3rd June, 2009 passed by Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur in Criminal Original Case No. 201/2003, whereby application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by present petitioners was partly allowed. The application of petitioner no.1 Smt. Champa wife of Rooplal was dismissed. Application filed by petitioners no. 1 and 2 namely Kumari Minal and Master Jatin was allowed and respondent Rooplal was directed to pay a sum of Rs.750/- per month to Kumari Minal and Rs. 750/- per mont...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Sep-11-2013
D.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 177/2012. Lalit Shanker Vs. Smt. Sunder Bai // 1 // 19 D.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 177/2012. Lalit Shanker Vs. Smt. Sunder Bai .. Date of Order ::11. h September 2013. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Mr. Prabhat Ojha, for the petitioner. Mr. Anuj Sahlot, for the non-petitioner. BY THE COURT: (per Dinesh Maheshwari, J.) Preliminary This criminal revision petition, directed against the order dated 20.01.2012, as passed by the Family Court, Udaipur on an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code/Cr.P.C.), was filed by the petitioner, and was dealt with by the office, as a matter to be laid before a Single Judge of this Court. However, this petition has been placed before the Division Bench in view of an order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 17.07.2013 holding that this matter is required to be registered as DB Petition for Family Courts and Matr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Sep-05-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: (1) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.672/2013 Arun Kumar Chug vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (2) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.690/2013 Naresh Kumar Chug vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Judgment ::05. h September, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the appellants. ---- BY THE COURT: These appeals are directed against order dated 13.02.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners-appellants have been dismissed. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.672/2013 is time barred by 37 days and an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed. Having considered the submissions made in the said application, supported by affidavit, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in not filing the appeal within limitation and, therefore, the application see...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Sep-05-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: (1) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.672/2013 Arun Kumar Chug vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (2) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.690/2013 Naresh Kumar Chug vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Judgment ::05. h September, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the appellants. ---- BY THE COURT: These appeals are directed against order dated 13.02.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners-appellants have been dismissed. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.672/2013 is time barred by 37 days and an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed. Having considered the submissions made in the said application, supported by affidavit, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in not filing the appeal within limitation and, therefore, the application see...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-17-2013
[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER N.K. Ragwani Vs. State & Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2272/2002 Date of Order : December 17, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Avinash Acharya, for the petitioner. Mr. D.C. Sharma, for respondent No.2. BY THE COURT: The petitioner, a retired employee of Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur has filed this writ petition, seeking annulment of the decision of the Syndicate of the University bearing No.83/2001 dated 16.12.2001 and its consequential order dated 12.2.2002 (Annex.10). Apart from these reliefs, the petitioner has also craved for direction against the respondent/University to reimburse the requisite amount of medical expenses, which he has incurred for his cardiac ailment and for [2]. undergoing operation of angioplasty at Cardiac Unit, SMS Hospital, Jaipur. For claiming the aforementioned reliefs, petitioner has inter-alia averred in the writ petition that while serving the University, he was ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Oct-21-2013
TILOK SINGH & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10339/12 ) & 89 connected matters. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER1 TILOK SINGH & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10339/12 ) 2. NATHULAL BAMANIYA & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.9435/13) 3. VIMLESH PALIWAL & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11058/13) 4. BABU SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11796/13) 5. HITESH PARIHAR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6968/13) 6. RAM NARAYAN GURJAR & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2870/11) 7. DEEPAK SINGH CHARAN VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10106/13) 8. RAJESH KHATIK & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2945/13) 9. MAHAVEER PRASAD PUROHIT & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.230/13) ...
Tag this Judgment!