Court : Kolkata Appellate
Decided on : Feb-17-2011
..... the intervener is not a certificate debtor, property of the intervener cannot be attached.7. in support of his contention, mr. roychowdhury has referred to the decision of air 1970 sc 564, 2004(121) company cases 783, air (32) 1945 cal 298 and also the decisions of the honble justice dipankar datta in w.p. no.411 of ..... i am of the opinion that the learned recovery officer has not exceeded his jurisdiction in passing the impugned orders. the learned recovery officer cannot be said to have acted without jurisdiction. so, this revisional court exercising jurisdiction under article 227 of the constitution of india should not interfere with the impugned orders. this application is not maintainable. ..... is at the instance of an intervener and is directed against the order no.21 dated august 18, 2006, order no.37 dated september 19, 2007, order no.39 dated january 16, 2008 and order no.45 dated july 22, 2008 passed by the learned recovery officer, kolkata debts recovery tribunal i in r. p. case no. .....
Tag this Judgment!