Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1993KAR1910; 1992(2)KarLJ388
ORDERVasanthakumar, J.1. Petitioner in this Writ Petition has sought the following reliefs.-a) Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing Annexure-H, dated 20.5.1992 in No. KV VIM (Samyojane) 91-92 700 issued by the first respondent herein.b) Direct the respondents to consider on merits the application made by the petitioner Sangha for the affiliation of its BEd college for the academic year 1991-92 in accordance with the provisions of Section 53 of the Act and issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant affiliation/renewal/continuation of affiliation for the academic year 1992-93. During the pendency of this Writ Petition the petitioner has filed additional statement of facts and has sought for quashing of the order dated 19.6.1992 on the following lines (I.A.No. 1 was allowed on 26.8.1992).c) Writ of Certiorari quashing the impugned order at Annexure-J dated 19.6.1992 in No. ED 108 UGC 91 passed by the Second respondent herein in the interest of justice.F...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2009KAR584; 2009(3)KarLJ364:2009(2)KCCR10092009(2)AIRKarR441(D.B)
V. Gopalagowda, J.1. The appellant-ITI Employees Housing Co-Operative Society Limited filed this writ Appeal questioning the correctness of the order of the learned Single Judge passed in writ Petition No. 5110/2001(LA-HB) wherein the learned Single Judge has declined to quash the notification impugned in the Writ Petition by which the first respondent-state Government in exercise of its power Under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 (hereinafter called as L.A. Act) denotified 1 acre 15 guntas of land out of 7 acres 15 guntas including 7 guntas of phut kharab in Sy. No. 18 of Mallathahalli village, Yeshwanthapur Hobli, Bangalore Smith Taluk, Bangalore District in favour of the appellant's society urging various grounds.2. There is no need fox us to advert to the facts in this judgment as the learned single Judge has elaborately referred to the same. We are referring only the rival legal contentions urged in this appeal for the purpose of examining the same to find out wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the resolution on subject No.149/2009 dated 8.5.2009 passed by respondent No.1 allotting the Civil Amenity Site No.1, in Nagarbhavi layout, 2nd Stage, 2nd Block, Bangalore, to the 2nd respondent and direct 1st respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 27.2.2009 to allot site No.1, Nagarabhavi Layout, 2nd Phase, 2nd Block, Bangalore to it as per Annexure-B etc.) 1. The petitioner, a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 and an ‘Institution’ as defined in Rule 2(d) of BDA (Allotment of Civil Amenity Sites) Rules, 1989 (for short, the Rules), has filed this writ petition questioning the decision of Bangalore Development Authority (for short ‘BDA’) in allotting Civic Amenity Site No.1, Nagarabhavi Layout, II Stage, II Block, Bangalore, in favour of the 2nd respondent – Mitra Wrunda Youth Association , Bangalor...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
ORDERB.S. Patil, J.1. The grievance made by the petitioners in these writ petitions are similar. Therefore, they are clubbed, heard together and are disposed of by this common order.2. In W.P. No. 38007/2009. petitioner is carrying on sand quarrying operations in D.K. District. He had filed an application before respondent No. 3 - Deputy Director of Mines & Geology, Mangalore, seeking grant of quarrying permit for extraction of ordinary sand from Sy. No. 154-P1 of Aituru village, Puttur Taluk of Dakshina Kannada District. Respondent No. 3 granted quarrying permit vide order dated 27.10.2009 for a period of 90 days permitting him to extract and transport ordinary sand from the said land situated in Kumaradhara river bed. Royalty of Rs. 6,000/- has been collected from the petitioner. Quarrying permit issued is produced at Annexure-A. The quarrying permit granted was valid upto 26.01.2010.3. The grievance of the petitioner is that mineral dispatch permit to transport the extracted ordinar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India. It is prayed that this Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to 1) issue a Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order of the Hon’ble Court below dated 18.4.2006 on I.A.No.1 filed by the petitioner under 0.XXXVIII Rules 5 of C.P.C. in Misc. Petition No.10/2004 vide Annexure-E and order dated 1.2.2007 on the I.A.No.V, filed by the Petitioner under 0.XXXIX R.1 and 2 in Misc. Petition No.10/2004 vide Annexure-G, and to further allow the said applications. 2) Grant such other relief’s as are deemed fit and necessary under the circumstances of the case including the cost of this writ petition.) 1. This writ petition is by the Karnataka State Financial Corporation (hereinafter it is referred to as Corporation for the sake of brevity) seeking quashing of the orders dated 18.04.2006 passed on I.A.Nos.2 and 5 respectively in Miscellaneous Petition No.10/2004 by the District and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R ON THE11H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.883 OF2013... APPELLANTBETWEEN : STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MAHADEVAPURA POLICE STATION BENGALURU. (BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER) AND: SRI. B.Y. VENKATESH @ MUTHURAJU SON OF YELLAPPA AGED33YEARS RESIDENT OF RENTED ROOM OF RAMANJINI NAGONDANAHALLI ROAD IMMADIHALLI BENGALURU-560 066. (BY SRI J.T. GIREESHA, ADVOCATE)... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION378(1) AND (3) OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING TO GRANT LEAVE TO APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ACQUITTAL DATED2103.2013 PASSED2BY THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN SESSIONS CASE No.724 OF2007ACQUTTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS392 302 READ WITH SECTION34AND201READ WITH SECTION34OF INDIAN PENAL CODE. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERV...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1999KAR1961; 1999(5)KarLJ1
Y. Bhaskar Rao, C.J. 1. The Medical Council of India (hereinafter, for short, 'MCI') has filed this appeal assailing the judgment of the learned Single Judge disposing of the writ petition filed by respondent 1-college with certain directions.2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent 1-college was started in the year 1963-64. In the year 1985-86 the college had increased the seats up to 130 and the same was approved by the MCI. Thereafterwards, up to 1-6-1992 the seats in the college were increased from 130 to 175 and 175 to 195. The college had applied for approval of the said 195 seats to the MCI. An inspection was made on behalf of the MCI regarding the infrastructure of the college and they had suggested for remedying the defects pointed out by them, by upgrading the standards according to the norms provided by the MCI. Thereafter, further inspections were made and the Inspectors of the MCI inspected the college and gave the report, stating that the college has got all the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Writ Petition No.18992/2003 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order passed by the Respondent Bank dated 03.10.2001 vide Annexure-L, dated 26.12.2002 vide Annexure-Y and dated 28-03-2003 vide Annexure-A and etc., Writ Petition No.40590/2003 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order by the Respondent/Bank dated 16.07.2003 vide Annexure-C and etc., Writ Petition No.30035/2004 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash vide Annexure-Y dated 01.07.2004 passed by the Respondent and etc., Writ Petition No.10563/2005 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash order dated 14.12.04 vide Annexure-V passed by the Bank and etc.,) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to direct the respondent to disburse the pensionary benefits of this petition as per Annexure-B, forthwith and etc., These petitions are heard and disposed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY R-4 DT.25-3-2003 VIDE ANN. Q.) NAGARATHNA J. 1. In this writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 25.03.2003 passed in M.A.No.55/2003 (Annexure-Q) by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘DRAT’ for the sake of convenience). By the said order DRAT directed the respondent-Bank to receive the balance amount of Rs.63.00 lakh and release the title deeds related to the scheduled property to the 3rd respondent-institution which was to discharge the entire amount due to the Bank. The 3rd respondent-institution was directed to deposit before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (hereinafter, referred to as "DRT"), at Bangalore, a sum of Rs.20.00 lakh due to the borrower within two weeks from the date of the impugned order with a further direction to the Presiding Officer DRT to return the said amount to the borrower i.e., the p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.DESAI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1140 OF2016CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1677 OF2016CRL.A.No.1140 OF2016 BETWEEN: Sri. Mallikarjuna S/o Shankarappa Aged about 66 years R/o Hayikal Chitradurga District. ...Appellant (By Sri. H.N. Shashidhara Sr. Counsel for Smt. B.A. Sujatha - Advocate) AND:1. Sri. Vasantha @ Vasanthakumar M.P. S/o. Parameshwarappa Aged about 34 years 2. Sri. Parameshwarappa S/o. Siddappa Aged about 68 years 2 3. Smt. Girijamma W/o. Parameshwarappa Aged about 61 years All are residing at Kubaturu Village Soraab Taluk Shivamogga District 571112.4. State by Anavatti Police Station Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka Bangalore 560 001. ...Respondents (By Sri.Umesh P.B Advocate for Sri. R.B. Deshpande Advocate for R-2 and R-3; Smt. K.P. Yashodha HCGP for R-4; Vide court order dated 06.01.2022 and 24....
Tag this Judgment!