Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Court: jammu and kashmir Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.287 seconds)

Sep 25 1998 (HC)

Pt. Govind Ram Vs. Ram Saroop

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Sep-25-1998

Reported in : AIR1999J& K63

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal u nder Clause 12 of the Jammu and Kashmir Letters Patent is directed against the order passed by learned single Judge of this Court in Chamber on 26th of August, 1997. The said order has permitted the respondent No. 1 to file additional written statements, with a prayer to allow this appeal and set aside the impugned order.2. Brief facts giving rise to this case are that Election Petition No. 4 of 1996 titled Ram Saroop v. Returning Officer, is pending trial under the provisions of the Jammu and Kashmir Representation of the People Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), wherein election of the appellant has been questioned on a number of grounds. After the filing of written statement by the appellant to the said Election Petition vide order dated 22-5-1997 on an oral request having been made on behalf of the respondent No. 1-pct it Loner in the Election Petition, he was permitted to file replica to the written statement of defen...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 1998 (HC)

Mohammad Yousuf Magray Vs. Haji Ghulam Hassan and Two ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Apr-22-1998

Reported in : AIR1998J& K84

Kawoosa, J. 1. This review petition, seeking recall of order dated 22nd May, 1997, passed by a Division Bench of this Court, has been filed on 18th June, 1997. We don't feel the need to encumber this order with facts more than necessary; a brief resume of the relevant facts would suffice. 2. Civil Original Suit No. 22 of 1974, pertaining to 17 Kanals and 2 Marias of land situated at village Shankerpora of Tehsil Chadoora, was filed by petitioner, Haji Ghulam Hassan, before the High Court. This suit was partly decreed and partly dismissed vide judgment dated 16-11-1981 by the learned single Bench. The judgment resulted in filing of two cross appeals, one each by the petitioner and respondent herein, respectively bearing Nos. CIA No. 6/82 and CIA No. 8/82. These cross appeals were clubbed together by order dated 7-7-1986 passed by the Division Bench in CIA No. 8/82. Order dated 9-5-1989 passed on CIA No. 6/82 makes mention of the direction of the Apex Court to hear the appeals together. ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //