Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Aug-19-2013
Ashok Bhushan, J. This writ petition raises an important issue as to whether after the repeal of The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act,1976 (hereinafter referred to as "Act,1976") by The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act,1999 (hereinafter referred to as "Repeal Act,1999") an appeal challenging the order of the competent authority dated 31/3/1997, declaring surplus vacant land can be filed under Section 33 of the Act, 1976. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13/8/2012, passed by the District Judge, Kanpur Nagar allowing the Appeal No.68/2011 filed by the respondent against the order dated 31/3/1997, of the competent authority under the Act, 1976 by which 48266.42 Square Metres was declared as surplus vacant land in excess of the ceiling limit. Brief facts of the case giving rise to the writ petition are: Proceedings under the Act, 1976 were initiated by issuing a notice dated 27/12/1996 under Section 6(2) to the tenure holder Jagdish Chandra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-08-2013
Sudhir Agarwal, J. 1. The petitioner alongwith his sister, Smt. Nirmala Devi filed a Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 07 of 2009 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No. 7, Aligarh (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal") impleading one Sandeep Sharma son of Sri Satish Chandra Sharma and the Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. as defendants. 2. The facts, in brief, are that another brother of claimant met an accident on 05.09.2008 while travelling in Bus No. UP 85 E-9372 and died. Hence, claim was filed for compensation. The petition was allowed by Tribunal and judgment was delivered by respondent no. 2, Sri Rajaram Saroj, Additional District Judge, Aligarh, the Presiding Officer of Tribunal on 01.08.2011. The Insurance Company came up in appeal, i.e., First Appeal From Order No. 3515 of 2011. The appeal was admitted on 01.11.2011 and Court passed following interim order: "Heard on the question of grant of interim relief. Having regard to the ...
Tag this Judgment!