Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Court: allahabad Year: 1965 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.323 seconds)

Apr 06 1965 (HC)

Jamuna Das and anr. Vs. Smt. Gulab and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-06-1965

Reported in : AIR1966All196

Oak, J.1. In these 14 connected second appeals a common question of law has been referred to us. That question is in these terms :--'Does a second appeal He to the High Court against the appellate decree of a civil Court passed under Sub-section (4) of Section 332 (since deleted) of the U. P. Zamiudari Abolition and Land Reforms Act?'2. In order to understand how this question of law arose in these cases, it will be convenient to outline the facts of one case. Second Appeal No. 1183 of 1962 arises out of a suit filed by Smt. Gulab Rani, against Jamuna Das and others for ejectment under Section 209 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (Act No. 1 of 1951), hereafter referred to as the Act. Jamuna Das, defendant No. 1 raised a plea that defendants Nos. 1 and 2 wore bhumidhars of the land in dispute. That question was referred to the civil Court The civil Court decided that defendants are not bhumidhars of the land in dispute. The revenue Court accepted that finding, and d...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1965 (HC)

Buddha Pitai Vs. Sub-divisional Officer Malihabad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-19-1965

Reported in : AIR1965All382; 1965CriLJ306

Desai, C.J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of Misra, J. dismissing the appellant's petition for certiorari for the quashing of an order passed by an Additional Sub-Divisional Officer setting aside under Section 12-C of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 read with Rule 25 of the Panchayat Raj Rules the election of the appellant to the office of Pradhan of A Gaon Sabha. This special appeal came up for hearing befofe two of us who referred it to a larger bench because of certain questions of importance involved in it.2. The appellant was convicted on 27-7-82 under Section 16 read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and fined Rs. 100/-. He had been found guilty of mixing a prohibited colour in sweets sold to a customer. Subsequently he, Naumi Lal respondent No. 2 and two others, who are respondents 3 and 4 contested election for the office of Pradhan of a Gaon Sabha and the appellant was declared elected as Pradhan. Naumi Lal filed a petition under Section 12-C of...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //