Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Court: allahabad Year: 1953 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.338 seconds)

Sep 28 1953 (HC)

State Vs. Padma Kant Malviya and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-28-1953

Reported in : AIR1954All523; 1955CriLJ904

Malik, C.J.1. I have read the judgments prepared by learned brothers Desai and Muherji, jj. and agreed to the answers proposed by them.2. So far as the second question is concerned, it presents no difficulty and it is not necessary for me to add anything to what has already been said. All that the Oaths Act provides is, that nothing contained in the Oaths Act shall authorise the administration of oath to an accused person in a criminal proceeding. Reliance is not placed by the learned Government Advocate on anything in the Oaths Act to entitle him to cross-examine the contemner.3. The third question is a little difficult. Article 20(3) of the Constitution provides that: 'No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself,'We are concerned with the words 'accused of an offence'. I shall not like in this case to consider the larger question whether the words 'accused of' are restrictive and mean a person against whom proceeding in a criminal court for any...

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1953 (HC)

Vishnu Pratap and ors. Vs. Sm. Revati Devi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-1953

Reported in : AIR1953All647

Malik, C.J.1. This appeal has been filed by some of the opposite parties against whom an order was made by the learned Company Judge under Section 153 CO (8), Companies Act (VII of 1913). A preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the applicant respondent 1 that no appeal lies.2. We have confined the arguments only to the preliminary objection and, it is, therefore, not necessary to go into the facts in any detail. Rani Revati Devi filed an application in this Court under Section 153(C), Companies Act in the matter of the Vishnu Pracap Sugar Works Limited, Khadda, District Deoria. She claimed that the company was a private Ltd. Co. with a capital of Rs. 8,50,000/-, divided in 1,700 fully paid up shares of Rs. 500/- each, and most of the shares of the company were held by members of the Fadrauna Rai family. She alleged that she was a share-holder and managing director of the company and that opposite parties 2 to 4 supported by opposite parties 6 1o 8, and committed various ac...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 1953 (HC)

S.K. Dutt Vs. Law Book Co. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-08-1953

Reported in : AIR1954All570

B. Mukerji, J.1. Sri S.K. Dutt, an advocate practising in this Court, has filed this suit purporting to be one under Section 13, Copyright Act, 1914. The plaintiff alleges that he is the author and sole owner of the copyright in the work entitled 'The Indian Partnership Act by Mukerji and Dutt'. This work, the plaintiff alleges, he published in the year 1934 in collaboration with Sir Manmotho Nath Mukerji, an ex-Chief Justice of the High Court at Calcutta and an ex-Law Member of the Government of India.The plaintiff further alleges that the aforementioned book--the Law of Partnership in India--has earned a great reputation and it has had sales in the United States of America, in England and practically throughout this country. The plaintiff's case further is that defendant No. 2, namely, J.N. Bagga, published a work entitled 'Law Book Company's Commentaries of Law & Practice of Partnership & Private Companies in India' in the year 1947. This rival publication, according to the plaintif...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1953 (HC)

Dr. D.N. Kesarbani Vs. U.P. Medical Council, Through the Registrar, Lu ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-10-1953

Reported in : AIR1953All580

Sapru, J. 1. This application has been presented under Art. 226 of the Constitution to this Court by Dr. D. N. Kesarbani, Medical Officer of Government Tuberculosis Clinic at Allahabad, for various reliefs, and more particularly for a writ of prohibition commanding the opposite party from taking any steps towards erasing his name from the register of Medical Practitioners of this province.2. The facts which have given rise to this application may be stated shortly. Dr. Kesarbani had his early education at the Gurukul Kangri University at Hardwar. He had a bright career at that institution which is one of the best well-known private institutions in this country. For various reasons, it was the policy of this institution not to have affiliated itself to any university or incorporated as a university by an Act of the legislature. It has played, as has been testified to by educationists of eminence, an important part in the cultural and national life of this country. He graduated himself i...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //