Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC313IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No(s). 7880 of 2023) THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JAYEETA DAS ..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.3. The State of West Bengal has approached this Court by way of this appeal for assailing the legality and validity of the judgment dated 11th May, 2023 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in C.R.R. No.3180 of 2022. Brief Facts:- 4. Based on written complaint dated 1st January, 2022 filed by the SI Raju Debnath, STF Police Station, Kolkata on 28th 1 December, 2021 informing about recovery of an unclaimed black coloured bagpack lying abandoned at Sahid Minar containing some written posters of CPI(Maoist) and some incriminating articles about the activities of CPI(Maoist), FIR No.01 of 2022 came to be registered at STF Police Station, Kolk...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC292Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION Curative Petition (C) Nos.108-109 of 2022 In Review Petition (C) Nos.1158-1159 of 2021 In Civil Appeal Nos 5627-5628 of 2021 Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. Petitioner Versus Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. Respondent Page 1 of 39 PART A JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Factual Background ................................................................................................... 3 B. DMRCs claim and the Tribunals findings ............................................................. 7 C. Decisions of the High Court .................................................................................... 10 D. Judgment of this Court in appeal ........................................................................... 11 E. Issues in the Curative Petition. .............................................................................. 12 F. Submissions .........................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC281IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.14974 OF2022 K.B. LAL (KRISHNA BAHADUR LAL) APPELLANT Versus GYANENDRA PRATAP & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant before this court has challenged the order dated 19.05.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, by which the petition filed by the appellant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was dismissed. The appellant had invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 28.03.2022 of the Additional District Judge, 1 Barabanki, who had upheld the order dated 07.10.2021 of the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Barabanki.3. The dispute between the parties to this appeal relates to a piece of land situated in village Gharsaniya, Pargana Dewa, Tehsil-Nawabganj, District - Barabanki, which was sold by one Kalawati (Res...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE5H DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH R.S.A. NO.760/2018 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:1. . KUM. HARSHADA S., D/O SHIVALINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT26YEARS R/AT NO.153, 2ND CROSS K.S.R.T.C.LAYOUT UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560061. APPELLANT (BY SRI NISHANTH A.V., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . SRI MARIYAPPA S/O LATE HONNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT60YEARS R/AT NUNNUR VILLAGE VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160. RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.C. JAYAKIRTHI, ADVOCATE) THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION100OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED101.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.2/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED212.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.217/2012 ON THE FILE OF2THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATTANA, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT. THIS R.S.A. HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON1903.2024 THIS DAY, THE COURT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC262IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.21096 of 2019) UNION OF INDIA & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JAHANGIR BYRAMJI JEEJEEBHOY RESPONDENT(S) (D) THROUGH HIS LR JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: Leave granted.2. This appeal arises from an order passed by a learned single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 09.07.2019 in Civil Application No.1494 of 2019 filed in Writ Petition No.2307 of 1993 by which the High Court declined to condone the delay of 12 years and 158 days in filing the application for 1 restoration of the Writ Petition No.2307 of 1993 referred to above which came to be dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 10.10.2006.3. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be summarized as under.4. The suit property bearing S. No.402, Bungalow No.15A, situated at Staveley Road, Pune Cantonment, Pune1 was leased by the respondent in favour of the appellants on 09.03.1951.5...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC236IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1666 OF2015SATYANAND SINGH APPELLANT VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.THE CHALLENGE1 The present civil appeal lays a challenge to the judgment and order dated 05th September, 2012 (impugned judgment, hereafter) of the Principal Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal at New Delhi (AFT, hereafter), whereby the AFT rejected the appellants prayer seeking reference of his diagnosis as AIDS inflicted, to a fresh Medical Board. 1 BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS2 The factual matrix of the case, insofar as is relevant for the purpose of a decision on this appeal, is noted hereinbelow: (i) The appellant was enrolled in the Indian Army on 30th October, 1993 as a Havaldar. He continued discharging his duties on a clerical post without impediment until the year 1999, when he began suffering from fever, headache and vomiting. For treatment he was referred to the Jabalpur Military Hospita...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC223IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). /2024 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) NO(S). 5463-5464/2023 APOORVA ARORA & ANR. ETC. . APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). /2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.6786/2023 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). /2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5532/2023 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). /2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.8385-8387/2023 JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellants/accused are the actors, casting director, script writers, creator of the web-series College Romance1, and the media company that owns the YouTube channel on which the 1 TVF Media Labs Private Ltd. 1 web-series was hosted2. They are sought to be investigated and prosecuted for production, transmission, and online publication of obscene and sexually-explicit material under Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 20003. The appellan...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.101356 OF2023BETWEEN: VEERESHA S/O SIDDAPPA KORAVARA AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O.: NEAR LAKSHMI TALKIES, KAMPLI, TQ. HOSAPETE, DIST. BALLARI 583 132. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI R.H.ANGADI, ADVOCATE A/W SMT POOJA R SAVADATTI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA (KAMPLI POLICE STATION, BALLARI) REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD 580 011. 2 . SUBHADRA W/O PARASHURAMA AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, 2 R/O. 10TH WARD, NEAR LAKSHMI TALKIES, KAMPLI, TQ. HOSAPETE, DIST. BALLARI 583 132. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED1901.2017 IN JC No.25/2016, ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BALLARI FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/SEC. 376, 506 OF IPC AND...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... act in 2017, section 7 expressly delinked the offence of bribery from the actual performance of the act for which the undue advantage is received. the provision read as follows: 7. public servant taking gratification other than legal remuneration in respect of an official act. whoever, being, or expecting to be a public ..... infirmity or error on which a plea for a review and revision of the earlier view is based?. on the earlier occasion, did some patent aspects of the question remain unnoticed, or was the attention of the court not drawn to any relevant and material statutory ..... 105 reads as follows:38. granville austin, the indian constitution: cornerstone of a nation, oup (1972), xiii. 39 cad vol viii19may, 1949 draft article 85. page 44 of 135 part f 105. powers ..... 98 of 135 part h his purpose in speaking on both occasions is the same or very closely related. [ ].145. the courts in the uk have, overtime, advanced a narrower view than the earlier cases governing the field of privileges. they ..... of the function of a democratic legislative institution. members of parliament and legislatures represent the will of the people and 41 (1970) 2 scc272 page 47 of 135 part f their aspirations. the constitution was adopted to have a modernizing ..... distinguished from a single member, orders the publication and/or public distribution of committee hearings, reports, or other materials. of course, art. i, 5, cl. 3, requires that each house 'keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to time .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC173IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024[Arising out of SLP (C) No.17973 of 2015]. DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PNDT ACT AND CHIEF DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER ..APPELLANT VERSUS JASHMINA DILIP DEVDA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT J.K. Maheshwari J.1. Leave Granted 2. In the present appeal, the issue concerns the interpretation of power of Section 20(1) & (2) and Section 20(3) of the Pre conception and PreNatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation & Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 (hereinafter to be referred to as the PC&PNDT Act) for cancellation, suspension or suspension in public interest respectively by the appropriate authority specified in Section 17 of the PC&PNDT Act. 13. The brief facts are that the respondent no.1 is running a hospital at Ahmedabad by the name of Dev Hospital which is a type of polyclinic having doctors from multiple branches like gynecology, general physician and general surgeon treating patien...
Tag this Judgment!