Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE G.A. No.1945 of 2014 A.P.O. No.213 of 2014 The Ld. Registrar General, High Court, Calcutta Vs. Smt. Ananya Bandyopadhyay & Ors. With W.P. No.555 of 2014 Smt. Ananya Bandyopadhyay Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. B E F O R E: The Honble Justice INDIRA BANERJEE And The Honble Justice SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI For the Appellant : Mr. Kishore Dutta, Senior Advocate. Ms. Sumita Shaw, Advocate. For the Respondent/ Writ Petitioner : Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Heard on :12. 08.2015, 08.09.2015, 10.09.2015 Judgment on :11. 12.2015 Sakti Nath Mukherjee, Senior Advocate, Mukul Lahiri, Senior Advocate, Swapan Kumar Dutta, Advocate, S. Chakraborty, Advocate. Anirban Pramanick, Advocate. INDIRA BANERJEE, J.: This appeal being APO213of 2014 filed by the Registrar General, High Court, Calcutta is against an order dated 23 rd June, 2014 passed by the Honble Single Bench in Writ Petition No.555 of 2014 filed by a Judicial Officer, of the rank of D...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Oct-09-2015
ORDER SHEET GA No.3139 of 2015 With APOT No.460 of 2015 AP No.1156 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE RATNENDRA NARAYAN BHADURI Versus CRESPI MILANO PERFUMERIES INDIA PVT.LTD.& ANR BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE The Honble JUSTICE SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI Date : 9th October, 2015. Appearance: Mr.Sucharita Biswas, Adv.Mr.Debapriya Gupta, Adv.The Court : This appeal is against the order dated 31st August, 2015 passed by the learned Single Bench in a request under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act. By the order impugned the learned Single Bench has appointed an Advocate of this Court as Arbitrator at a consolidated remuneration of Rs.3 lakhs to be shared by the parties equally at the fiRs.instance subject to any directions in this regard that might be contained in the final order. Ms.Biswas appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant does not have the fina...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-31-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE WP No.756 of 2013 SHYAMAL SIRCAR AND OTHERS -VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS For the Petitioners: Mr Debayan Bera, Adv., Mr S. P. Chakrabarti, Adv. For the State: Mr Sadhan Ray Chowdhury, Adv., Mr Paritosh Sinha, Adv., Ms Sucharita Ray, Adv. For the Respondent No.4: Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr Mr For the Official Liquidator: Ms Smita Das De, Adv. Pratap Chatterjee, Sr Adv., S. N. Mookherjee, Sr Adv., Samit Talukdar, Sr Adv., Sounak Mitra, Adv., S. K. Saxena, Adv., Anuj Singh, Adv., Pratik Majumdar, Adv., Subrata Kr. Basu, Adv., R. L. Gaggar, Adv., S. Bose, Adv. Hearing concluded: August 28, 2015. BEFORE SANJIB BANERJEE, Judge Date: August 31, 2015. SANJIB BANERJEE, J.: The petitioners complain of being cheated by the State in their land being confiscated for a pittance only to be ultimately made over to realtors for a high- end residential complex being developed without the land being used for any p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-01-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE A.P.O.No.269 of 2014 A.P.O.T.No.334 of 2014 G.A.No.2427 of 2014 With A.P.No.483 of 2010 In the matter of: Niranjan Lal Todi versus Nandalal Todi and ORS.And A.P.O.No.271 of 2014 A.P.O.T.No.335 of 2014 G.A.No.2426 of 2014 With A.P.No.1121 of 2013 In the matter of: Niranjan Lal Todi versus Nandalal Todi and ORS.BEFORE: The Honble Justice INDIRA BANERJEE And The Honble Justice SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI For the appellant : Mr.Joy Saha, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.Samit Talukdar, Senior Advocate. Heard on :15.06.2015, 29.06.2015, 30.06.2015 Judgment on : 01.07.2015 INDIRA BANERJEE, J. : This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 15th May, 2014 passed by the learned Single Bench dismissing the applications being A.P.No.483 of 2010 and A.P.No.1121 of 2013 for inter alia termination of the mandate of the learned arbitrator, Mr.R.K.Chowdhury, to arbitrate the disputes between the appellant and the respondents. On or ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-08-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE A.P.O. 49 of 2015 W.P. No.1532 of 2006 Lieutenant Colonel C. K. Agarwal Vs. Union of India & Ors. BEFORE: The Honble CHIEF JUSTICE DR. MANJULA CHELLUR The Honble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI The Honble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Mr. Pradip Tarafdar, Advocate Mr. Sambuddha Dutta, Advocate Mr. Hemraj Adhikary, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Kaushik Chandra, Advocate Mr. Arindam Sen, Advocate for the Respondents. Heard on:25. 2.2015 & 4.3.2015. Delivered on: May 8, 2015. Dr. Manjula Chellur, Chief Justice : The above appeal is directed against the order dated 11.10.2007 in W.P. 1532 of 2006. When the matter came up for hearing before the Division Bench, Division Bench opined, since Union of India had set up a Tribunal to deal with disputes including service matters pertaining to Armed Forces personnel, in the light of Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act of 2007 (for short hereinafter referred to as AFT Act of 2007), whet...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-27-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Justice Soumen Sen G.A.No.2095 of 2014 C.S.No.262 of 2013 LMJ INTERNATIONAL LIMITED versus SWISS SINGAPORE OVERSEAS ENTERPRISES PTE LIMITED For the Petitioner/Defendant : Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv., For the Respondent/Plaintiff : Mr.Surojit Nath Mitra, Sr.Adv., Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.D.N.Sharma Heard On : 24.02.2015, 03.03.2015, 12.03.2015, 17.03.2015, 19.03.2015, Judgment On : 27th March, 2015 Soumen Sen, J.:- The instant application has been filed by the defendant for rejection of plaint and for dismissal of suit. The plaintiff has filed this suit praying, inter alia, for setting aside of a foreign award made in pursuance of an arbitration clause contained in a contract dated 22nd October, 2009. The arbitration clause reads:Clause 15 Arbitration All disputes in connection with this contract or the execution thereof shall be settled amicably by friendly negotiations between ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-09-2015
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA No.120 of 2000 C.I.T.(CENT-I).CAL Appellant Versus HOOGHLY MILLS LTD.Respondent BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 9th February, 2015. For the appellant : Mr.M.P.Agarwal, Advocate with Mr.S.N.Dutta, Advocate For the respondent : Mr.J.P.Khaitan, Senior Advocate The Court :- The subject matter of challenge in the present appeal is a judgment and order dated lst September, 1999 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing an appeal of the assessee by holding that What the assessee acquired is the fixed assets like land, building and also plant & machinery, for which the price had to be paid partly in cash and partly by way of taking over the accrued liability in respect of the gratuity and leave salary payable to the workeRs.For the purpose of computing the cost of the assets, only the present-day value of these accrued liab...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Oct-14-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA BEFORE: Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE The Honble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN GA No.2408 of 2012 CS No.201 of 2012 Apollo Zipper India LTD.Versus W. Newman & Co.Limited. For the Plaintiff : Mr.Jishnu Saha, Mr.Hashnuhana Chakraborty, Mr.Anna Malhotra For the Defendant : Mr.Pratap Kr. Chatterjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.Tilak Kr. Bose, Mr.Raj Ratan Sen, Mr.A.R.Gomes, Ms.A.Jain. Heard On : 14.08.2014, 21.08.2014, 03.03.2015, 24.03.2015, 28.04.2015, 09.06.2015, 16.06.2015, 07.07.2015, 04.08.2015, 13.08.2015, 25.08.2015, 08.09.2015, 15.09.2015,19.09.2015, 29.09.2015. Judgment On : 14th October, 2015 Soumen Sen, J.:- This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Chapter 13A of the Rules on the Original Side of this Court for summary eviction of the defendant from premises no.18 Hemanta Basu Sarani previously known as 1, 2 & 3 Old Court House Street, Calcutta 700069. The plaintiff claims to be the owner of the property in question. The plaintiff sued the def...
Tag this Judgment!