Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-08-1973
Reported in : AIR1973Cal264,1973CriLJ102
Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant against a judgment of affirmance. The plaintiff instituted the suit on the following allegations: The suit land covered by C. S. Dags 171, 172 and 173 measuring .97 decimals khatian No. 65 published under the Non-agricultural Land Assessment Act (Bengal Act XIX of 1936). situate Mouja Manirampore P. L. S. Barrackpore within North Barrackpore Municipality, with structures on portion of dag No. 171 belonged to the plaintiff. The structures and land appertaining thereto measuring .10 decimals are recorded as R. S. dag Nos. 171/198 and 171/199 which are in khas possession of the plaintiff. The remaining land with tank recorded in dag No. 172 measuring .20 decimals. Pahar of Tank recorded in day No. 173 measuring .08 decimals and the remaining portion of dag No. 171 measuring .59 decimals, in all .87 decimals was settled by the plaintiff with the defendant at a monthly rent of Rs. 10-6-8 p. or annual rent of Rs. 125/-for three years...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Nov-16-1973
Reported in : 78CWN200,[1974]95ITR343(Cal)
Amiya Kumar Mookerji, J. 1. This appeal is by the assessee-company and it is directed against the judgment and order of B.C. Mitra J. dated June 7, 1971, discharging a rule nisi obtained by the appellant upon the view that, as the appellant failed to adopt and pursue the alternative remedy which was available to it, a writ-court ought not to grant it any relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. 2. The appellant-company is the owner of premises No. 21, Rup Chand Roy Street, Calcutta. The company made default in payment of income-tax in respect of three assessment years 1964-65, 1965-66 and 1966-67. Four certificates under Section 222 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were forwarded by the Income-tax Officer to the Tax Recovery Officer. In execution of the said certificates, the Tax Recovery Officer attached the said premises No. 21, Rup Chand Roy Street, Calcutta. According to the appellant, it had paid in three instalments a total sum of Rs. 30,000 towards the claim under the said cert...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-18-1973
Reported in : [1977]47CompCas689(Cal)
Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Sections 391, 392, 393 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, for sanction of a scheme of amalgamation and other consequential orders and directions.2. The facts of the case shortly are : That the petitioner, United Bank of India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the ' petitioner-bank ') was incorporated in the year 1918 and carried on banking business in the Eastern region of India. Three other banking companies, Comilla Banking Corporation Ltd., Comilla Union Bank Ltd., and Hooghly Bank Ltd. were amalgamated and/or merged with the pstitioner-bank with effect from 18th December, 1950, under the provisions of Section 44A of the Banking Companies Act, 1949. The registered office of the petitioner-bank is situate at No. 24, Park Street, Calcutta. The authorised capital of the petitioner-bank is Rs. 4,00,00,000 divided into 5,00,000 ordinary shares of Rs. 20 each and 30,00,000 shares of Rs. 10 each. The amount of capital of the petitio...
Tag this Judgment!