Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-07-1987
Reported in : AIR1988All79
A.N. Varma, J.1. The petitioner is an association which claims to represent 450 out of 726 cold storages operating in different parts of the State. The association assails the validity of the U. P. Government Notification No. 847/XII-4-585-86, dated February 19, 1987 issued by the- State Government in exercise of its powers under Section 29 of U. P..Regulation of Cold Storages Act, 1976 (the 'Act', in brief) fixing the maximum hiring charges which a licencee may charge for storing potatoes in the cold storage including any other service rendered in connection therewith at Rs. 23A per quintal for the period from February 15, 1987 to November, 30, 1987 or part thereof in the whole of Uttar Pradesh.2. The petition represents a class of litigations which have, over the years, become an annual feature in this Court. Each year that the Government notifies maximum storage charges under the said Act for potatoes cold storages of Uttar Pradesh have been making an annual trip to this Court on th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Feb-25-1987
Reported in : AIR1988All150
V.P. Mathur, J.1. This first appeal from order, passed by Mr. R.S. Tripathi, the then Vth Additional District Judge, on 19-1-84, in Misc. Case No. 39 of 1983, is directed against an order granting permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to the respondent.2. Briefly stated, the proceedings for a decree of divorce were going on in the court below between the parties at the instance of the husband Vinod Chandra Sharma. The learned Additional District Judge dismissed the petition for divorce on 19-1-84 and by the present impugned order of the same date he passed the order granting Rs. 350/- per month as permanent alimony in favour of the wife and against the husband. It is contended that this order is patently illegal and cannot be allowed to stand.3. I have heard the learned counsel on both the sides. Permanent alimony and maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act can only be granted if divorce is granted but not during the subsistence of the marri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-05-1987
Reported in : AIR1987All235
K.C. Agarwal, J.1. Out of the writ petitions challenging the validity of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (U.P. Act No. 7 of 1986) three cases, which were argued by Sri Jagdish Swarup, Sri Ravi Kiran Jain, and Sri Rakesh Dwivedi, are Writ Petition No. 4562 of 1986, Ashok Kumar Dixit v. State of U.P. Writ Petition No. 2545 of 1986, Hari Singh Thakur v. State of U.P., and Writ Petition No. 6096 of 1986 Bramha Din v. State of U.P. Apart from these Advocates, others who made their submissions before us were Sri A.N. Srivastava and Sri D.S. Misra. The remaining Advocates did not advance any argument in addition to what bad been argued challenging the validity of the Act by the Advocates aforesaid and they adopted the arguments made by them. We must record our appreciation for the valuable assistance received by the Court from the learned counsel on many issues arising in these cases.2. For the decision of the points urged, it is not necessary to mention t...
Tag this Judgment!