Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 145 publication of official journal Sorted by: old Year: 1951 Page 1 of about 2 results (1.687 seconds)

israil Khan Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

Ram Labhaya, J.1. The petnr. Israil Khan @ Babua was ordered to be externed from the Province of Assam for a period of five years by the order of the Mag., 1st Class, Dibrugarh, dated 18-8-1949. On appeal, the learned Ses. J., UAD, modified the order of externment by reducing the period of externment from 5 to 3 years.2. The petnr. has assailed the correctness of the orders of the Cts. below on several grounds by a petu. Under Sections 435, 439 and 561 A of the Cr. P. C3. Briefly stated the facts are that the proceedings were initiated on a report dated 21-1-1949 from the Inspector of Excise, Dibrugarh, to the Dist. Mag. The report was to the effect that Israil Khan was by habit a smuggler of opium. He was importing opium from outside the Province & selling it to local retailers. His house had been searched on a number of occasions on suspicion but nothing incriminating was found as the result of these searches. It was further stated that he had secret places for storage of opium & h...

Feiner Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

Feiner v. New York - 340 U.S. 315 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315 (1951) Feiner v. New York No. 93 Argued October 17, 1950 Decided January 15, 1951 340 U.S. 315 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK Syllabus Petitioner made an inflammatory speech to a mixed crowd of 75 or 80 Negroes and white people on a city street. He made derogatory remarks about President Truman, the American Legion, and local political officials, endeavored to arouse the Negroes against the whites, and urged that Negroes rise up in arms and fight for equal rights. The crowd, which blocked the sidewalk and overflowed into the street, became restless; its feelings for and against the speaker were rising, and there was at least one threat of violence. After observing the situation for some time without interference, police officers, in order to prevent a fight, thrice requested petitioner to get off the box and stop speaking. After his third refusal, and after he had bee...

Sm. Lilabati Rana Vs. Lalit Mohan Dey and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1952Cal499

R.P. Mookerjee, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent for dissolution of a partnership of business and for adjustment of accounts.2. The plaintiff's case was that that two families the Pals and the Deys joined in a partnership business. Nafar Chandra Pal, the predecessor in interest of defendants Nos. 9 to 13, and the Deys who were four brothers, viz., Chandi, Lalit, Harimohan and Satis, entered into a partnership under the name and style of Pal and Sarkar for carrying on a business of money-lending and as gold and silversmiths. The plaintiff as one of the four members of the joint family is entitled to a two anna share in the said business. The plaintiff alleges that he did not receive any payment from the defendants since 1936, and that he did not want to continue as a partner. He further alleges that he had dissolved the partnership by a verbal notice on the 2nd May, 1943. As there had been no accounting between the parties, the plaintiff prayed t...

Pailwan Abdul Khader and ors. Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1951Kant72; AIR1951Mys72

Venkata Ramaiya, J.1. These are applns. filed under Article 226, Constitution of India, for issue of writs of certiorari calling for records & quashing the proceedings in Crim, case Nos. 1 & 2 of 1948. 49 on the file of the Ct. of the Sp. J, Tumhur & writs in the nature of habeas corpus directing the release of petnrs. from detention. The two cases referred to arise out of disturbances which occurred on 1-3-1949 in the shandy of Sira, a Town in Tumkur District, from a clash between Hindus & Muscleman's resulting in the death of a Jamedar, grievous hurt to a Police Inspector & injuries to others. It is alleged in the affidavits filed in support of the petns. that charge sheets for offences under Sections 302, 326, etc., I. P. C., were presented on 9-4-1949 in the Ct. of the Sp. First. Clasa Mag, Madhugiri, by the Police against the petnrs. that by a Notn dated 22 4-1949, the Govt. of Mysore constituted the Ct. of the Special J. Tumkur, under Section 2 of the Sp. Criminal Courts Act, 194...

Bala Majhi Vs. the State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1951Ori168

Ray, C.J.1. I have had. the opportunity a privilege of reading the judgment prepared by my learned brother Narasimham, J. I am in entire agreement with him as to the answers proposed therein & associate myself with all the reasons adduced in support thereof. I also agree with the order of conviction & sentences proposed.2. In view, however, of the practical importance of the question posed to standardisation & stabilisation of this branch of law in this State, I propose to add, as given below, some further reasons for my agreement with him. I have, since, seen the judgment proposed by my learned brother Das, J. He agrees with answers proposed. He, however, has added some further reasons not for the purpose of rein, forcing the correctness of the answers but for a different purpose. It seems he should approach the question with a leaning towards admissibility of a confession as a rule leaving it to the accused to be bound thereby to establish the exception by proof of circumstances that...

United States Vs. Yellow Cab Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

United States v. Yellow Cab Co. - 340 U.S. 543 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Yellow Cab Co., 340 U.S. 543 (1951) United States v. Yellow Cab Co. Argued December 6, 1950 Decided February 26, 1951 * 340 U.S. 543 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Syllabus The Federal Tort Claims Act empowers a United States District Court to require the United States to be impleaded as a third-party defendant and to answer the claim of a joint tortfeasor for contribution as if the United States were a private individual. Pp. 340 U. S. 544 -557. 1. The Government has consented to be sued for contribution claimed by a joint tortfeasor in the circumstances of these cases. Pp. 340 U. S. 546 -552. 2. The Federal Tort Claims Act carries the Government's consent to be sued for contribution claimed by a joint tortfeasor not only in a separate proceeding, but also as a third-part defendant. Pp. 340 U. S. 552 -557. 3. A different result is not r...

Abed Ali Vs. Prafulla Kumar Sen

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1952Cal544

Harries, C.J.1. This is a Reference made to a Full Bench by a Bench of this Court in an appeal from an order of a single Judge sitting on the Original Side. The Bench referring the case pointed out that there was a conflict of authority and that' however the case was decided, another Bench decision of this Court would have to be, dissented from. That being so the referring Bench was of opinion that it had no alternative but to refer the case to a Full Bench.2. To appreciate, the points involved it will be necessary shortly to set out the facts which gave rise to this litigation.3. The defendant-appellant resides in a village called Kulgachia in the District of Howrah, the village being about twenty-eight miles away from Calcutta. He carried on the business of manufacturing mosquito netting and eventually one Maniruddin who had purchased, netting from the defendant-appellant introduced the latter to the plaintiff Prafulla Kumar Sen Gupta. The , plaintiff ordered quantities of. mosquito ...

Durga Dei Vs. Sadananda Prusty and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1952Ori182

Jagannadhadas, J.1. The 1st defendant is the appellant in this second appeal. The appeal arises out of a suit filed under Order 21, Rule 63, of the Civil P. C., which has been filed by the plaintiff-decree-holder against whom an adverse order was passed, on a claim filed by the 1st defendant. The suit was dismissed in the trial Court, but on appeal it was decreed against the 1st defendant and hence this appeal. 2. The suit property comprises two lots, specified in the plaint covering an extent of .010 acres which admittedly belonged to one Kinu Sahu. Defendant 1 is his daughter. D. 2 according to the plaintiff is the adopted son of Kinu Sahu and D. 3 is the son of D. 2. Kinu Sahu appears to have died sometime long prior to 1919. D. 2 borrowed a sum of Rs. 90/- from the plaintiff on a mortgage of certain property, other than the suit property, admittedly belonging to Kinu Sahu. The mortgage is Ex. 1 dated 5-5-1919. The palintiff filed subsequently a suit on that mortgage, obtained a dec...

James Chadwick and Bros. Ltd. Vs. the National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1951Bom147; (1951)53BOMLR556; ILR1952Bom344

Chagla, C.J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of Shah J., by which he set aside the order of the Registrar of Trade Marks & directed the Registrar to register the mark of the petitioners as a trade mark. The petitioners applied on 12-1-1943, to the Registrar of Trade Marks for the registration of their mark in connection with cotton sewing thread. There was an opposition by the appellants & the Registrar came to the conclusion that the mark which the respondents sought to register was likely to deceive & cause confusion & therefore he refused to register the mark. From this decision of his an appeal was preferred to the High Court, &, as I just said, Shah J. after hearing the appeal came to the conclusion that the Registrar was wrong & that the respondents were entitled to have their trade mark registered.2. A preliminary objection has been taken by Mr. Desai that this appeal is not competent. The judgment of Shah J., is subject to appeal provided it constitutes a judgment within th...

Joint Anti-fascist Refugee Committee Vs. Mcgrath

Court : US Supreme Court

Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath - 341 U.S. 123 (1951) U.S. Supreme Court Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 (1951) Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath No. 8 Argued October 11, 1950 Decided April 30, 1951 * 341 U.S. 123 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus Purporting to act under Part III, 3 of Executive Order No. 9835, the Attorney General, without notice or hearing, designated the three petitioner organizations as Communist in a list furnished to the Loyalty Review Board for use in connection with determinations of disloyalty of government employees. The Board disseminated the list to all departments and agencies of the Government. Petitioners sued for declaratory judgments and injunctive relief. They alleged that their organizations were engaged in charitable or civic activities or in the business of fraternal insurance; all three implied an attitude of coope...