Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-23-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6897-6898 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 19314-19315 OF2021 OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V. POLARIS GALAXY Appellant (s) Versus BANQUE CANTONALE DE GENEVE Respondent (s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals are against a judgment and order dated 28th October 2021 passed by the Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court of Judicature at Madras allowing Commercial Appeal being O.S.A (CAD) No.88 of 2021 filed by the Respondent, and setting aside an order dated 24th September 2021 passed by the Commercial Division (Single Bench) of the High Court, adding Gulf Petroleum FZC as defendant in the Admiralty Suit filed by the Respondent, Banque Nationale De Geneve being CS (Commercial Division) No.96 of 2021. 13. The Appellant, M/s Galaxy Marine Services Limited is the registered owner of the Vessel, M. V. Polaris Galaxy, a sea-going oil tanker, flying the fla...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-22-2022
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3132 OF2018D. SWAMY Appellant Versus KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD AND ORS. Respondents JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act 2010, is against a final order dated 10th May 2017 passed by the National Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai, dismissing the Application No.169 of 2016 (SZ) filed by the Appellant under Section 18(1) read with Section 14 of the National Green Tribunal Act 2010, whereby the Appellant had prayed for a direction for closure of the Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facility run by the Respondent No.3, on the ground of alleged non-compliance of the provisions of the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006, hereinafter referred to as the 2006 EIA2Notification as amended on 17th April 2015.2. In the meanwhile, by a notification being S.O. 327 (E) dated 10th April 2001, published in the Gazette of India...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-18-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 13554-13555 OF2022Board of Control for Cricket in India Appellant(s) Versus Regional Director Employees State Insurance Corporation and Anr. Respondent(s) ORDER M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 24.06.2022 passed in First Appeal ST No.25980 of 2021 preferred by the appellant the Board of Control for Cricket in India (hereinafter referred to as BCCI) by which the High Court has dismissed the said first appeal, which was filed against the judgment and order passed by the Employees Insurance Court at Bombay dated 09.09.2021, declaring that the BCCI is covered within the meaning of shop as per notification 1 dated 18.09.1978 issued by the Government of Maharashtra under the provisions of Section 1(5) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ESI Act...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-07-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2661 OF2015State of Uttarakhand ... Appellant Versus Sudhir Budakoti & Ors. ... Respondents JUDGMENT M. M. SUNDRESH, J.1. Aggrieved over the judgment rendered by the High Court of Uttarakhand in allowing the Writ Petition (S/B) No.51/2011 filed by the Respondents before us, the present appeal by special leave has been filed. NECESSARY FACTS2 The statute by the name, State Universities Act, 1973 enacted by the State of Uttar Pradesh was adopted by the State of Uttarakhand through a modification order of the year 2001.3. Section 16 of the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) deals with the post of Registrar, who shall be a 1 whole-time officer of the University. He shall not be offered nor be entitled to accept any remuneration for any other work in the University, save as provided under the governing rules. His appointment has to be in terms of Section 17 of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-02-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).35853586 OF2022(@ SLP(C)No(s). 59895990 of 2022) ARAVINTH R.A. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of his two writ petitions praying respectively for, (i) a declaration that Regulations 4(a)(i), 4(a)(ii), 4(b) & 4(c) of the National Medical Commission (Foreign Medical Graduate Licentiate) Regulations 2021, hereinafter referred to as the Licentiate Regulations; and (ii) a declaration that ScheduleII2a) and 2(c)(i) of the National Medical Commission (Compulsory Rotating Medical Internship) Regulations, 2021, (hereinafter referred to as CRMI Regulations) both published on 18.11.2021, are ultra vires and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution, the writ 1 petitioner before the Madras High Court has come up with the above appeals.2. We ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-27-2022
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.4634 OF2014VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28394 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28922 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.29273 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.............OF2022(@ DIARY No.41063 OF2015 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.9987 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.10018 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.10019 OF20152 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.993 OF2016TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.150 OF2016TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS.151-157 OF2016WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.152 OF2016SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.11839 OF2019SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.2890 OF2017SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.5487 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1269 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1270 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1271-1272 O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-01-2022
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 823-827 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.2001-2005 of 2021) The State of Manipur & Ors. .... Appellant (s) Versus Surjakumar Okram & Ors. . Respondent (s) W I T H Civil Appeal Nos. 828-832 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.2386-2390 of 2021) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted.1. The Manipur Parliamentary Secretary (Appointment, Salary and Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2012 (Manipur Act No.10 of 2012) (hereinafter referred to as the 2012 Act) was enacted by the Legislature of Manipur to provide for appointment, salary and allowances 1 | Pa ge of Parliamentary Secretaries in Manipur. Section 3 read with Section 4 thereof, enabled the Chief Minister to appoint a member of the Manipur Legislative Assembly as a Parliamentary Secretary, who shall have the rank and status of a Minister of State. Section 7 of the 2012 Act stipulated that a Parliamentary Secretary shall be entitl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-02-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5929 OF2022[ ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.13754 OF2022]. Dr. Abraham Patani of Mumbai & Anr. ..... Appellants VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... Respondents JUDGMENT Surya Kant, J:1. Leave Granted.2. This appeal arises from the judgment dated 30.05.2022 passed by the Bombay High Court dismissing the Appellants Writ Petition in which they had sought to quash a series of resolutions passed by Respondent No.2, as well as notifications and a final award of compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (LAA) issued by Page 1 of 57 Respondent Nos. 10 & 11, which cumulatively resulted in acquisition of parts of the Appellants property for construction of a new road. A. FACTS3 The genesis and course of the present dispute spans several decades and includes one prior round of litigation before this Court. The crux of the matter arises from the opposition by Appellants to the c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-16-2022
REPORTABLE2022INSC1293IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9252-9253 OF2022(arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 7860-7861 of 2018) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY APPELLANT(S) BOARD & ORS. VERSUS THOMAS JOSEPH ALIAS .RESPONDENT(S) THOMAS M. J.& ORS. WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 9256-9257 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7886-7887 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9254-9255 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7875-7876 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9262 -9263 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7880-7881 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9264 -9265 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7863-7864 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9266 -9267 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7882-7883 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9268 -9269 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7884-7885 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9270 -9271 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7870-7871 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9258 -9259 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7873-7874 of 2018 Civil Appeal Nos. 9260 -9261 of 2022 @ SLP(C) Nos. 7878-7879 of 2018 JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J., 1. Leave granted in all the captioned Special Leave Petitions.2. Since th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-01-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 837-838 OF2022[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.35970-71 of 2016]. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Appellant (s) Through its Senior Manager Versus M/s Shree Ganesh Petroleum Rajgurunagar Through its Proprietor Mr. Laxman Dagdu Thite Respondent (s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals are filed by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment and order dated 11th September 2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay partly allowing Arbitration Appeal No.19 of 2013 filed by the Respondent and dismissing Arbitration Appeal No.39 of 2013 filed by the Appellant.3. The facts giving rise to these appeals are stated very briefly hereinafter. 14. The Appellant took a plot of land, hereinafter referred to as the said premises, on lease from the Respondent for a term of 29 years, pursuant to a deed of lease dated 20th September 2005 which was duly registered, in...
Tag this Judgment!