Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
D.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 177/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER D.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 177/2010 Smt. Champa & Ors. versus Rooplal Date of Order:13. h September, 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Mr. Sajjan Singh with Mr. Manish Rajpurohit, for the petitioners. Dr. Javed Moyal with Mr. Mohsin Dhera, for the respondent. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:-(Oral) (Per Jain, J.) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 3rd June, 2009 passed by Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur in Criminal Original Case No. 201/2003, whereby application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by present petitioners was partly allowed. The application of petitioner no.1 Smt. Champa wife of Rooplal was dismissed. Application filed by petitioners no. 1 and 2 namely Kumari Minal and Master Jatin was allowed and respondent Rooplal was directed to pay a sum of Rs.750/- per month to Kumari Minal and Rs. 750/- per mont...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
D.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 177/2012. Lalit Shanker Vs. Smt. Sunder Bai // 1 // 19 D.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 177/2012. Lalit Shanker Vs. Smt. Sunder Bai .. Date of Order ::11. h September 2013. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Mr. Prabhat Ojha, for the petitioner. Mr. Anuj Sahlot, for the non-petitioner. BY THE COURT: (per Dinesh Maheshwari, J.) Preliminary This criminal revision petition, directed against the order dated 20.01.2012, as passed by the Family Court, Udaipur on an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code/Cr.P.C.), was filed by the petitioner, and was dealt with by the office, as a matter to be laid before a Single Judge of this Court. However, this petition has been placed before the Division Bench in view of an order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 17.07.2013 holding that this matter is required to be registered as DB Petition for Family Courts and Matr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER M/s. K.B. Cooperative Art Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6213/2014 Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Date of Order: October 14, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Vineet Dave, for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Jain, for respondents No.2 & 3. Mr. Manoj Bhandari, for respondent No.4 ***** Reportable BY THE COURT: This petition portrays a battle royal for winning a contract of shopping emporia for Palace on Wheels and Royal Rajasthan on Wheels for the season 2014-15 for Jaisalmer. In this fierce legal battle, two competitors, i.e. petitioner and the fourth respondent, are pitted against each other. [2]. Although matter comes up on an application of the respondents for vacation/modification of the ad-interim stay order but with the consent of rival parties it is heard finally at this stage. Succinctly stated, the facts of the case are that second respondent...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. 1.D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3610/2003 Shri Jain Swetambar Terapanthi V/s The Rajasthan Non- Manav Hitkari Sangh and ORS.Government Educational Institutions Tribunal & ORS.2.D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3611/2003 Shri Jain Swetambar Terapanthi V/s The Rajasthan Non- Manav Hitkari Sangh and ORS.Government Educational Institutions Tribunal & ORS.Date of Order::- 29.4.2014. PRESENT Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Amitava Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Vijay Bishnoi Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Tatiya for the appellants. Mr.Sanjay Mathur for the respondent no.2. Mr.A.K.Rajvanshy for the respondent no.3-Md.University. Mr.Digvijay Singh, Additional Government Counsel. ORDER BY THE COURT (Per Hon'ble Amitava Roy,CJ.The proceedings in hand witness impugnment of the judgments and orders dated 26.3.2003 passed by the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. 1.D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3610/2003 Shri Jain Swetambar Terapanthi V/s The Rajasthan Non- Manav Hitkari Sangh and ORS.Government Educational Institutions Tribunal & ORS.2.D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3611/2003 Shri Jain Swetambar Terapanthi V/s The Rajasthan Non- Manav Hitkari Sangh and ORS.Government Educational Institutions Tribunal & ORS.Date of Order::- 29.4.2014. PRESENT Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Amitava Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Vijay Bishnoi Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Tatiya for the appellants. Mr.Sanjay Mathur for the respondent no.2. Mr.A.K.Rajvanshy for the respondent no.3-Md.University. Mr.Digvijay Singh, Additional Government Counsel. ORDER BY THE COURT (Per Hon'ble Amitava Roy,CJ.The proceedings in hand witness impugnment of the judgments and orders dated 26.3.2003 passed by the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 D.B.Civil Restoration Application No.31/2014 In D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10971/2009 Jagdish Kumar Sain V/s State of Rajasthan and ORS.21.2.2014 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Amitava Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Vijay Bishnoi Mr.Rajesh Shah for the applicant-writ-petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-writ-petitioner. The accompanying D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10971/2009 had been registered on an application seeking amongst others the following reliefs:- (i) the writ petition may be allowed and the respondents authorities be directed to conduct a detail survey of the land in question, out of which a piece of land has been allotted to the Income Tax Office and also to the School and over which the building for Income Tax Officer has been constructed and also cemented road has also been constructed from Income Tax Office to the National Highway, and looking to the same the application submitted by the people of Sirohi for the plot in the Rajeev Nagar Scheme and a piece of plot ...
Tag this Judgment!