Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-17-2013
LPA No.2188 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No.2188 of 2012 Date of decision :12. 07.2013. Ganga Parshad ..Petitioner. versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHAVIR S. CHAUHAN Present : Mr.Rajiv Singh Doon, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Randhir Singh, Addl.AG, Haryana. Mahavir S. Chauhan, J. The instant Letters Patent Appeal has been filed under Clause X of Letters Patent to challenge judgment dated 24.7.2012 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No.4368 of 2012 allowing the writ petition filed by respondent No.3 and setting aside resolution dated 17.02. 2012 adopting motion of no confidence against Naresh Kumar (respondent No.3 herein).The factual background of the case is that in the year 2010, respondent Naresh Kumar was elected as Vice Chairman of the Block Samiti, Jind, District Jind (hereinafter referred to as the 'Samiti').Some members of the Sa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-31-2013
CRM not M-17772 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (221) CRM not M-17772 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:31. 07.2013. Gurdavinder Singh and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.B.D.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Deep Singh, DAG, Punjab. **** SABINA, J. Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the FIR No.28 dated 07.05.2011 under Sections 342, 343, 344 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC).registered at Police Station Kambo, District Amritsar Rural and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the FIR in question has been registered on the basis of secret information that the petitioners were running unauthorized de- addiction center in the name and style of Navjeevan Drug Sandeep Sethi 2013.08.05 10:39 I ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-26-2013
LPA No.2169 of 2012 and other connected appeals -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 LPA No.2169 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision:26. 8.2013. Dinesh Kumar .......Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents 2. LPA No.4 of 2013(O&M) Mohinder Singh .......Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents 3. LPA No.5 of 2013(O&M) Smt. Saroj Rani and others .......Appellants Vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents 4. LPA No.6 of 2013(O&M) Shiv Dayal .......Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents 5. LPA No.38 of 2013(O&M) Daya Kishan .......Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents 6. LPA No.39 of 2013(O&M) Dr. Anand Kumar Goyal .......Appellant Kumar Pardeep 2013.09.12 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA No.2169 of 2012 and other connected appeals -2- **** Vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents 7. LPA No.40 of 2013(O&M) Sham Lal through L.Rs. .......Appellant Vs. S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-05-2013
Saluja Mukesh Kumar 2013.09.16 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP NO.11386 o1. HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.11386 of 1997 Date of decision:05.08.2013 The National Jattan Cooperative Agricultural Service Society Ltd...Petitioner(s) Versus The Joint Secretary, Cooperation (Appeals) Punjab and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK 1 To be referred to the Reporters or No.?.2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?. Present: Mr.Harit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J. (Oral) Feeling aggrieved against the impugned order dated 23.1.1995 (Annexure P-5) and the order dated 28.11.1996 (Annexure P-6) passed by the respondent authorities, thereby directing reinstatement of respondent No.4 in the service of petitioner-society, the present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of In...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-30-2013
Kumar ViNo.2013.09.02 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP Nos.14223, 17018, 21324, 21325 of 2010 and [1].12804 & 16875 of 2011(O&M) ***** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) CWP No.14223 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:30.08.2013 Khalsa College of Education ...Petitioner Versus Panjab University ...Respondent (2) CWP No.17018 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:30.08.2013 Khalsa College of Education ...Petitioner Versus Panjab University ...Respondent (3) CWP No.21324 of 2010 Date of decision:30.08.2013 Sr.Guru Gobind Singh College of Education ...Petitioner Versus Panjab University, Chandigarh ...Respondent (4) CWP No.21325 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:30.08.2013 Guru Nanak College of Education ...Petitioner Versus Panjab University, Chandigarh ...Respondent (5) CWP No.12804 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:30.08.2013 Baba Mangal Singh Institute of Education ..Petitioner Versus Panjab University, Chandigarh ...Respondent (6) CWP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-10-2013
Saluja Mukesh Kumar 2013.08.29 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP NO.1478 o1. HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.1478 of 2012 Date of decision:10.07.2013 Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. ...Petitioner(s) Versus Permanent Lok Adalat Utility Services and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK 1 To be referred to the Reporters or No.?.2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?. Present: Mr.Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate, for the respondents. RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J.The present writ petition is directed against the award dated 9.5.2011 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Gurgaon, directing the petitioner insurance company to pay the due amount to the claimant-respondent No.2. Facts first. Respondent-claimant was owner of a Tata truck bearing registration not HR-55-G-1690. The vehicle...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-10-2013
CP No.69 of 2013 ::-1-:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ORDINARY ORIGINAL COMPANY JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION No.69 OF 201.(O & M) In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act,1956 and In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Escorts Hospital and Research Centre Limited..Transferor Company I/Petitioner Company-I And Escorts Heart and super speciality Institute Limited....Transferor Company-II/Petitioner Company-II And Kanishka Healthcare Limited....Transferor Company-III/Petitioner Company-III With International Hospital Limited....Transferee Company Petitioner Company-IV Present: Mr Atul V. Sood, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. SURYA KANT J. In this petition under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, duly supported by affidavits, the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-15-2013
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20656 OF 201.:{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 15 2013 Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Science and Research Mullana-Ambala and another .....Petitioners VERSUS Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present: Mr.Puneet Bali, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vibhav Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners (in CWP Nos.20656 of 2011 &7595 of 2012) and for respondent Nos.4 & 5 in CWP No.20659 of 2011. Mr.Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vishal Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners (in CWP No.20659 of 2011).Mr.Karminder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1-Union of India. Mr.Deepak Sibal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr.Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for respondent No.3-State. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Ma...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:30. 04.2013 CWP No.7570 of 2013(O&M) Gurmehtab Singh & others ..Petitioners versus State of Haryana & others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Saurabh Goel, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Mamta Singhal Talwar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. H.N. Mehtani, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Mr. K.K. Kareer, Registrar (Recruitment), Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh-respondent No.4. HEMANT GUPTA, J.(Oral) This order shall dispose of the afore-mentioned writ petition along with other writ petitions mentioned in the foot note of this order, wherein challenge is to the result of the preliminary examination of Haryana Civil Services (Judicial Branch) Examination, 2012 conducted on 17.03.2013. The petitioners are the aspirants for appointment to the Haryana Civil Services (Judicial Branch) for which advertisement was published on 17.12.2012. The petitioners appe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Sep-02-2013
CRA-D No.781-DB of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:02.09.2013 CRA-D No.781-DB of 2006 (O&M) Arun @ Shankar .... Appellant Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CRA-D No.817-DB of 2006 (O&M) Sunil @ Sukha .... Appellant Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CRR No.2547 of 2012 Ashok @ Shauki .... Petitioner versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CRM No.53-MA of 2007 (O&M) State of Haryana .... Appellant Versus Sandeep @ Kala .... Respondent CRM No.604-MA of 2007 (O&M) State of Haryana .... Appellant Versus Ravi Kant .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present: Mr. Bijender Dhankhar, Advocate with Mr. B.S.Chahar, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-D No.781-DB of 2006 and as Amicus Curiae in CRA-D No.817-DB of 2006. Bura Sonia 2013.09.16 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRA-D No.781-DB of 2006 -2- Mr. G.S.Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner in CRR...
Tag this Judgment!